
Already posted thatAre we? We'll play McCartin back since no Francis, and possibly only 1 of McLean, Buller, Ladhams comes in.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Already posted thatAre we? We'll play McCartin back since no Francis, and possibly only 1 of McLean, Buller, Ladhams comes in.
May i ask , have you ever coached ? amazing knowledge of the gameHow Papley escapes getting dropped I don't know.
CongratulationsAlready posted that
There's a lot of confidence in how people think this game will go.
I have no idea how it will go.
All I can say with any confidence is that this game will be ****ing boring
You don't miss anything , should be coaching with you're knowledgeCongratulations
So you don't care if players put in effort when you're coaching?May i ask , have you ever coached ? amazing knowledge of the game
But no one can put a different thought to youSo you don't care if players put in effort when you're coaching?
Sounds like a solid strategy.
I don’t know who Karl Worner is - but he is the ultimate whipping boy on the Freo board.
He will therefore be BoG against us.
No, that was Ivan Soldo.Didn't he right Rocky in the 4th Rocky Movie?
Three talls might be needed in our team at present. Lost in all the discussion as to our forward structure is the fact that our entries have been steaming hot garbage, so we run the risk of being dominated in the air, while at ground level, we're a pretty average 11th in the comp for tackles inside 50.
So we've gotta give one area a boost, and there's more options to do so in the air than at ground level.
If I have one complaint re selection it's that we haven't yet entertained the idea of Ladhams as the main ruck. I just don't think he's that bad??
No, that was Ivan Soldo.
The best way to do that would be to give Grundy a week off managed, doing a training block like we did with Franklin. Not in 2s. Bad idea.Three talls might be needed in our team at present. Lost in all the discussion as to our forward structure is the fact that our entries have been steaming hot garbage, so we run the risk of being dominated in the air, while at ground level, we're a pretty average 11th in the comp for tackles inside 50.
So we've gotta give one area a boost, and there's more options to do so in the air than at ground level.
If I have one complaint re selection it's that we haven't yet entertained the idea of Ladhams as the main ruck. I just don't think he's that bad??
I'm not convinced they'll work together. Neither have shown enough as forwards (IMO) to suggest we'd be able to ruck one and rest the other forward and vice versa.Even fully fit we need to manage Grundy. This is the chance to actually see if they both work together anyway
Yeah Grundy's 31 & played 200 games. He doesn't need match practice in the reserves. He just needs to not be run into the ground week on week.The best way to do that would be to give Grundy a week off managed, doing a training block like we did with Franklin. Not in 2s. Bad idea.
Who says? Not me.But no one can put a different thought to you
Sounds like someone attempting a knock off entry into our Warner bros.I don’t know who Karl Worner is - but he is the ultimate whipping boy on the Freo board.
He will therefore be BoG against us.
I'm not convinced they'll work together. Neither have shown enough as forwards (IMO) to suggest we'd be able to ruck one and rest the other forward and vice versa.
I think only one can ruck, and I kinda lean towards preferring Ladhams at this point, for the simple fact he doesn't move like he's 110 years old.
Agree with this 100%. Ladhams is a ruck first, forward a distant second. He is no Luke Jackson. Just think back to that Port debacle last year to get an idea about where he stands as an AFL forward. I think he should only play as a solo ruck (like Grundy).I'd be happy to give Buller a run. 23 yr old 199cm KF who actually shows forward craft and a marking ability in the 2's. I think you have to have a look at what that looks like at Senior Level at some point, might be nothing but should atleast look and if not now with all our injuries, when?
I seriously hope we're not considering bringing in McLean & Ladhams both into the side. One or the other I could live with but not both.
In addition to Grundy that's virtually playing 3 rucks. Never seen 3 rucks work, infact last time we tried was 112, but when you consider in addition our KF would be Amartey who is an athlete type not a natural forward...that's 4 talls but none really natural forwards. Recipe for disaster imo, especially with the quality of their Key backs.
I agree. It would be good to share the load this year. Grundy was cooked by the last third of 2024.I wouldn't be against taking Ladhams and McLean to Perth.
Leave Brodie home for the 2 week break and no long flight there and back .
He's had six months off and still looks cooked. His opening season form is a bit of a worry.I agree. It would be good to share the load this year. Grundy was cooked by the last third of 2024.
Was much better last week against one of the bestHe's had six months off and still looks cooked. His opening season form is a bit of a worry.