V. Dissapointed about Bower being out. Chance for someone else though. I'm currently on a train from the Gold Coast and it is wall-to-wall Blues fans, so expect there to be alot of support for the boys in the crowd!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
April fool's is over already... please tell me this is a sick joke
How long before the game does the official starting squad have to be named?
40 mins?
Final teams
In: Dennis Armfield
Out: Paul Bower
Carlton
B: Aaron Joseph, Michael Jamison, Bret Thornton
HB: Andrew Walker, Dennis Armfield, Jordan Russell
LOL
TBH, thought it was more important that Jammo got up. Emu wasn't really going to play on Brown and we've still got options between Thornton, Waite, Setanta and even Hendo. Armfield gives us the same run out of the back half too.
TBH, thought it was more important that Jammo got up. Emu wasn't really going to play on Brown and we've still got options between Thornton, Waite, Setanta and even Hendo. Armfield gives us the same run out of the back half too.
Well considering Bower went up with the team, and BIB seemed to think he would play, hopefully it is just this week, and the 9 day break helps him.
Although this has made it a bit tougher, I'm still confident we can come home with a win.
This paragraph is borderline trolling, but I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt, because I would rather respond to it than card it.
It should be pointed out that in our recent wins over Brisbane ie R21, 2008, R2, 2009 & R11, 2009 our defence conceded 10, 9 & 6 goals respectively to Brown & Bradshaw, so I'm not really sure that containing Brown & Fev is as important as you would have us believe.
I would be yet to label Brennan a top tier midfielder, on the basis of one game against the West Coast midfield which consists of Kerr, then daylight, then Priddis & some cameos from Masten. Perhaps we can give the same rating to Carrazzo, who collected 40 disposals (at 80% efficiency, compared to Brennan's 65%) against Richmond's midfield of Cousins, Deledio, Cotchin & Martin.
Banfield is a great little trier, but he butchers the ball something chronic (41% efficiency means he only contributed 7 efficient disposals on the night) & Redden only came into the game when the Eagles had run out of petrol tickets (sort of like Brown & Fev, who kicked 4 of their 8 goals in the last quarter, when the Eagles put up no resistence at all).
You say Yarran will only be dangerous when left unmanned. Yarran becomes unmanned because he is so adept at burning off his opponents. This was first displayed last season against Sydney, but on Thursday night, with a full pre-season under his belt, he was able to have a greater impact on the game, not only with his 3 goals & 2 goal assists, but also his 6 tackles & his chasing which resulted in turnovers.
Containing Fev and Brown? Fairly important last night.
Brennan? Well, he was one of the worst cramped up last week. Couldn't expect a huge game on a 5 day break, but he still managed our 3rd most disposals, and a game high 9 tackles (only other player with more than 5 was Scotland on 7). Not his best work, but a solid game nonetheless.
As I said, Banfield was a real 'up and comer'. Certainly more than just 'a great little trier'. I think last nights game, despite only having 11 touches, he put in a great contribution, 2 goals of his own, harassed and hassled time and time again (and just saw him set Brown up for a goal, on the replay).
And another 'up and comer', I named in Redden, did a few things, but admittedly had a pretty quiet game. Fair to expect that occasionally from an up and comer.
As I said originally, Yarran looks like he has got potential, he's certainly shown some good signs. But I'm still yet to see him do anything when a game is on the line (kicked his 3 against Richmond when the result was beyond doubt). Carlton never broke out to a huge lead, so as I guessed, he didn't do much damage.
As I said after you made these comments, I wasn't trolling, just adding a bit of Brisbane-perspective to your pre-match discussion. Bit of a shame you couldn't take my comments for what they were.
Containing Fev and Brown? Fairly important last night.
Brennan? Well, he was one of the worst cramped up last week. Couldn't expect a huge game on a 5 day break, but he still managed our 3rd most disposals, and a game high 9 tackles (only other player with more than 5 was Scotland on 7). Not his best work, but a solid game nonetheless.
As I said, Banfield was a real 'up and comer'. Certainly more than just 'a great little trier'. I think last nights game, despite only having 11 touches, he put in a great contribution, 2 goals of his own, harassed and hassled time and time again (and just saw him set Brown up for a goal, on the replay).
And another 'up and comer', I named in Redden, did a few things, but admittedly had a pretty quiet game. Fair to expect that occasionally from an up and comer.
As I said originally, Yarran looks like he has got potential, he's certainly shown some good signs. But I'm still yet to see him do anything when a game is on the line (kicked his 3 against Richmond when the result was beyond doubt). Carlton never broke out to a huge lead, so as I guessed, he didn't do much damage.
As I said after you made these comments, I wasn't trolling, just adding a bit of Brisbane-perspective to your pre-match discussion. Bit of a shame you couldn't take my comments for what they were.
Brown was the difference between the 2 teams, no doubt about that. Fev's contribution was cancelled out by Hendo's 3 goals for us. Effectively if Betts kicks accurately Carlton wins. Unfortunately he missed 4 easy shots on goal (unusual for Eddie) & we lose.
Brennan had nowhere near the impact he had last week & his disposal efficiency of 59% serves to support that.
Banfield chipped in for a couple of goals, but then he had the small forward role to himself this week, with Power spending more time on the ball this week & therefore not contributing any goals, after kicking 3 last week. Banfield's disposal is still ordinary (55% this week, after 41% last week) & he tries to do too much with the ball, in much the same way as Mitch Robinson does for us.
There is virtually nothing between Carlton & the Lions, with it taking a fantastic effort from Brown to get the Lions over the line. We will never know if Brown would have been able to perform as well if Bower had played & Thornton had been able to assist Bower in limiting Brown's impact. It will be interesting to see what happens next time if we have all our defensive talls in action & also our best player, Judd, particularly if we once again dominate the midfield as we did last night & again have the best ruckman on the ground (Kreuzer).
Hendo's goals... 2 were from received handballs in front of goal, one was from a free kick (I think, anyway... memory may be fuzzy.) I think Fev had to work much harder for his. You can't really 'cancel out' players like that, IMO. Fev also worked as a wonderful decoy for Brown...and... Regardless of whether Fev put in a blinder (which he did not), it's fair to say stopping Fev & Brown was still pivotal to the outcome.
Agreed, Brennan wasn't nearly as damaging as last week (would be pretty tough to back that up!). But again, he was definitely no slouch, as I said, most tackles despite playing very, very tired.
That said, there were some serious under-performers last year. Black is yet to get up and running, and there is quite clearly something not quite right about Clark (was sick last week, yet was hardly more effective last night). Once he gets back to 2009 form, save a serious improvement from Kreuzer (which isn't beyond him at this stage of his development), I daresay we'll have the dominant ruckman the next time we meet. All of this is irrelevant- the game will be within 3 goals regardless.
I'll take your ignoring of my comments on Yarran as a sign of you agreeing with my prediction that he would have little to no impact.