Round 3 trades

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
assuming Touk Touk makes the final squad

Ablett to VanBerlo
Goddard to Oxley

$$$
 
more so with goodes i think. hurrah. new defender rooky playing this week.
might pay to hold off on goodes trade c how byrne plays

Oh he's a def? Sweet! Could be handy. Goodes is just stinking up my bench atm. Very hard to get him on field with McIntosh saad and Oxley going so well. He's not even that strong a cover now that he's been sub. I really didn't see him being sub at all this year.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I have just done the Miller to NVB trade

I can see NVB rising to somewhere near $400k due to the Crows soft draw before their bye in round 10.

Leaves me with a midfield of Fyfe, Pendles, Duckwood, Ward, Danger, NVB, Heeney, CEY, Vandenberg, Cripps and Krak
 
Hey guys,

I'm stuck and not sure which trade to make... $316K in the bank..

I have narrowed down to 3 options:
Lambert > Van Berlo
Lambert > Rich
Lamb > Tex Walker

All 3, NVB, Rich or Tex will make me good money.. However if I go the 3rd option (Tex) that will leave me with very little in the bank.

Thoughts on which trade will benefit my team better? Or any other ideas I haven't seen?

Much appreciated :thumbsu:

Here is my team:
upload_2015-4-16_20-6-43.png
 
Sooo much caaaash :)
mmhmm :)
next week Miller or Cripps (if shit score) to Parker (at ~560k ;))

then week after NBrown to Birchall or MJ :)

SC Gods will most likely destroy my plans though
 
considering keeping ablett for another week as jpk wont change much in value
and go either......

lamb - mcgrath

or

goodes or ibbo - bruc or mcdonald

thoughts please?
 
Yeah have all three.
Mids are: Fyfe, JPK(R.I.P GAJ) Lewis, Watson, Griffen, Rich Heeney, CEY Bench of Vanders, Touk, Cripps.
Didn't trade last week. Gain NVB av92 rd3 inc of 70k and BE OF -59. Spend 100k to lose Touk BE 4 avg32 . Seems straight forward enough... The spend + the trade is whats got me in two minds. Lol bloody supercoach
I'm leaning towards making a trade to get NVB in only because I don't project the player I'm trading out to have made enough money for me even despite the initial outlay in doing the correction plus I don't know if his job security is 100%, but that's my reasoning, it might not apply to you. It would also mean a solid bench option if any of my other mids miss rather than potentially relying on a low scoring or dropped player. Also my projection in price rise was linear which is never the case, one or two 100+ games could generate some cash a bit more quicker than the round 10 end point I interpolated those 80s to (conversely, 60ppg games would have the opposite affect which is always a risk).
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

any suggestions about what to do? i have 1 trade and $126K

r3.JPG

i was thinking Goodes > Laird. if Goodes plays then i'll kick myself but if he doesnt i miss out on Laird at his current price and i'll kick myself

also considered Lambert > NVB mostly because everyone here seems to think he's a must. im not convinced though and a floating mid/fwd donut could come in handy, although considering Andersons form last week i may well end up with 2 mid donuts.

or i could just keep the trade. help me
 
Hey guys,

I'm stuck and not sure which trade to make... $316K in the bank..

I have narrowed down to 3 options:
Lambert > Van Berlo
Lambert > Rich
Lamb > Tex Walker

All 3, NVB, Rich or Tex will make me good money.. However if I go the 3rd option (Tex) that will leave me with very little in the bank.

Thoughts on which trade will benefit my team better? Or any other ideas I haven't seen?

Much appreciated :thumbsu:

Here is my team:
View attachment 125094
i'd leave lambert for now. having the DPP ability even for a guy who is out for a few months can be handy. maybe look at upgrading the backline? trade up goodes before he drops price.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top