97 makes me trading him a certaintity, bleeding cashOr he might play and cop the vest. Breakeven of 97. The only way he's staying in my team is if he gets dropped
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
97 makes me trading him a certaintity, bleeding cashOr he might play and cop the vest. Breakeven of 97. The only way he's staying in my team is if he gets dropped
I'll be glad if he just gets dropped. Solves the problem of which 2 out of Oxley, Saad & McIntosh to play. A non playing Goodes will come in handyOr he might play and cop the vest. Breakeven of 97. The only way he's staying in my team is if he gets dropped
It would be best case scenario really. Gives us an extra week to look at the guys back there that debuted this weekI'll be glad if he just gets dropped. Solves the problem of which 2 out of Oxley, Saad & McIntosh to play. A non playing Goodes will come in handy
Yeah fair call.. Need to make sure you nail the rookie pick then IMO.Or he might play and cop the vest. Breakeven of 97. The only way he's staying in my team is if he gets dropped
Of course. I am a little hesitant as picking rookies after 1 game was where I bombed out a lot last year, but Goodes is going to be worth SFA if I wait too long before trading himYeah fair call.. Need to make sure you nail the rookie pick then IMO.
Whitecross or upgrade to keeper?Of course. I am a little hesitant as picking rookies after 1 game was where I bombed out a lot last year, but Goodes is going to be worth SFA if I wait too long before trading him
Hopefully he gets dropped this week, that would be best case scenario
Whitecross tempting. I have no money in the bank though, so I can't go to a keeper. It also means I might go to one of those cheaper guys that debuted this weekWhitecross or upgrade to keeper?
Doesn't help that he's getting the vest. He could have been alright if he was getting a proper runDon't get goodes, competent in the VFL, struggles in the big league
I got in Whitecross once Goodes was named sub, not expecting much from Whitecross for a month but hope he'll be handy through the byesWhitecross or upgrade to keeper?
Don't get goodes, competent in the VFL, struggles in the big league
Whitecross tempting. I have no money in the bank though, so I can't go to a keeper. It also means I might go to one of those cheaper guys that debuted this week
Won't play sub, as Anderson seems to have that role patched up...I got in Whitecross once Goodes was named sub, not expecting much from Whitecross for a month but hope he'll be handy through the byes
Wallis wa subbed out straight away, he's a good footy player don't get me wrong, but he's too slow for the pace of the modern game.Doesn't help that he's getting the vest. He could have been alright if he was getting a proper run
I reckon he'll be a D7/8 if he keeps himself fit.Won't play sub, as Anderson seems to have that role patched up...
Will be a slow burner, but could make you a good $200+k once gets going and looks a safer bet than any current rookies available without price rises having occurred.
Won't be a keeper but usually good for 75+ each week when fit.I reckon he'll be a D7/8 if he keeps himself fit.
As a D7/8 I'd be happy to have someone posting regular 75sWon't be a keeper but usually good for 75+ each week when fit.
Apologies. D7-8 yes, was thinking on field..As a D7/8 I'd be happy to have someone posting regular 75s