Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Couldn’t disagree more especially about hill.And that is why as a club we are as weak as piss, accept mediocrity.
No surprise that Lyon was our most successful recent coach, yes he had some talented players but he was ruthless.
Have no issue with Geary playing , but there can be no defence of Hill being selected and minimal argument that Ross should be in the side.
To me a HF is the most difficult to play. You're in no man's land running up and down between the 2 arcs and have to be disciplined to keep your width and not be dragged towards the ball.. It's opportunistic position and you need to have a good fitness base. It's not an ideal position for a debutant. But hey that's just my 2 centsJust take marsh spot at hf with time in the middle.
What difference does that make?He should have at least been named on the extended bench.
Means nothing. He would know he is or isn’t playing now.
And that is why as a club we are as weak as piss, accept mediocrity.
No surprise that Lyon was our most successful recent coach, yes he had some talented players but he was ruthless.
Have no issue with Geary playing , but there can be no defence of Hill being selected and minimal argument that Ross should be in the side.
So other clubs drop there highly paid boys? ReallyVery disappointing Ratts, i expected better. The highly paid boys club aka leaders of the club won't be touched and we are looking at the easy scapegoats it would seem IF they even play the ins.
Only St Kilda.
Well I doubt he goes straight in the middleTo me a HF is the most difficult to play. You're in no man's land running up and down between the 2 arcs and have to be disciplined to keep your width and not be dragged towards the ball.. It's opportunistic position and you need to have a good fitness base. It's not an ideal position for a debutant. But hey that's just my 2 cents
I always think this stuff is amazing. They do speak.It would at least show that his place in the starting side isn't an automatic lock and that he was a chance to be dropped.
Well now that Ross and Hill are still the side let's hope that they respond with good performances, although being against Adelaide it may not mean that much.
I don't think he will start there. But when the game has settled , he'll be in the middle with the rotationsSo other clubs drop there highly paid boys? Really
Well I doubt he goes straight in the middle
Yep. Hopefully around 15% of the game. I can’t believe I left marsh in the side. Certain to be out so lonie and Paton both play.I don't think he will start there. But when the game has settled , he'll be in the middle with the rotations
Like it apart from Ryder. Will never get Marshall or Ryder as forwards. Terrible there.Team will line up as named looking at it further.
ins Ryder, Byrnes
outs Long, Marsh
Zero accountability for last weeks loss
The finalized team is released tomorrow at 5. I was hoping they’d list the dropped players from tonight to make a point of not rewarding poor performance, but there’s still a chance for the team to take a stance on the guys like Ross who are meant to be leaders.
No you are right he has been outstanding just going to place money on him for the Brownlow.Couldn’t disagree more especially about hill.
So because I want him to play I think he has been outstanding. I’m possible to have a serious conversation if that’s your starting point Good players from other clubs get more of a chance than others. And he has been ordinary but not patheticNo you are right he has been outstanding just going to place money on him for the Brownlow.
You are Judging Hill on reputation and past performance not current out put which has been beyond disappointing.
Hill has the game to be in the top few in our best and fairest yet would not be in top half of the team currently and quite frankly his attack on the ball and the man has been woeful.
You are an astute follower of the club so generally interested in why you think he should have maintained his position.
I really hope he is best on ground and starts playing to his ability.
Back in the day did you think that Dal Santo and Milne should have been dropped ?
Exactly. We're talking about Australian Rules Football at the highest level. This isn't the same scenario at your local footy club after Thursday night training where you're sitting in the club rooms eating a hot dog and smashing down a beer waiting to see if you're playing in the 1's or magoos.Pretty sure the coaches would have had a strong word with them without having to make a public statement by putting them on interchange to please the likes of us.
UnfortunatelySo it's back to the old two ruck attack.
I’d be looking elsewhere Jimmy.
So it's back to the old two ruck attack.