Snuffaluphagus
Brownlow Medallist
- Sep 10, 2015
- 25,408
- 88,045
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
People keep going on about how quick he is. Very rarely uses it. Doesn't run hard. Isn't tackling or chasing when playing on the wing. About the only thing he does well occasionally is kick to advantage better than most of the other players.Hughes had 4 turnovers.
He also had one touch forward of halfway, and even that was only just.
A winger who did not touch the ball within 40m of the attacking forward 50?
That just won’t do.
View attachment 1675261
I like it. Just not sure about having a forward as a sub.Out: Banfield, Hughes, Johnson
In: Erasmus, Corbett (sub), Worner, Treacy
JLO:Im excited to watch Ras go at it for a full game tbh, just fights for everything and won’t die trying
Doesn’t Corbett have a tank though?I like it. Just not sure about having a forward as a sub.
16 not enough from a winger , Should be getting it much more like that new wingman that Carlton picked up this yearHughes had 4 turnovers.
He also had one touch forward of halfway, and even that was only just.
A winger who did not touch the ball within 40m of the attacking forward 50?
That just won’t do.
View attachment 1675261
Yeah I was under the same impressionAm I the only one that thought Hughes was playing defense on the weekend?
Seemed a pretty clear role change with noddy and aish being the primary wingers?
Don't understand all this talk of him not getting a touch in the front half then, wouldn't expect many there from defenseYeah I was under the same impression
If he can offer run that's fine. It would be more likely that they will play either Sturt or Corbett (annoyingly) or sub out Sturt for Corbett.Doesn’t Corbett have a tank though?
With Sturt we can cover the forward
half and wings.
Nah Corbett can definitely replace Banners and keep Sturt in.If he can offer run that's fine. It would be more likely that they will play either Sturt or Corbett (annoyingly) or sub out Sturt for Corbett.
Looking at the heat map he did spend time on the wing It appears he just stood in one spot.Don't understand all this talk of him not getting a touch in the front half then, wouldn't expect many there from defense
Yeah but it was probably a split of like 70/30 defence wing. Remember we dropped wagner with no replacement, so we were a defender down in theory.Looking at the heat map he did spend time on the wing It appears he just stood in one spot.
If only. Ha haNah Corbett can definitely replace Banners and keep Sturt in.
Following the gameplan to a T.Looking at the heat map he did spend time on the wing It appears he just stood in one spot.
That 30 % needs to go to someone like Bradshaw or Switta maybe Johnson , Young, Chappy so we have room in the team for both Johnson and Erasmus. And it may allow us to improve our inside mid rotations. We can't leave our inside mids the way they are.Yeah but it was probably a split of like 70/30 defence wing. Remember we dropped wagner with no replacement, so we were a defender down in theory.
Vertical plankingLooking at the heat map he did spend time on the wing It appears he just stood in one spot.
Ryan > Wilson
Johnson > Erasmus
Banfield > Corbett
Hughes > Worner
Schultz > Emmett
Draper/Fyfe/Treacy as sub.
Guys have come into the team who have done less than Worner. Hes been putting up numbers in the WAFL since last year. I know his disposal isn't great but I don't get why we don't just trial him on the wing. He's got experience there. Maybe not this week but we've got some unwinnable games coming up for him to have a go.I'm a fan of Worner's but I don't think he's ready and we really need to win this one. Worner needs to improve his contested work and his disposal is too inconsistent ATM.
I also don't think Schultz should be dropped after just one poor game. The others I like.
He's had more than one poor game.I'm a fan of Worner's but I don't think he's ready and we really need to win this one. Worner needs to improve his contested work and his disposal is too inconsistent ATM.
I also don't think Schultz should be dropped after just one poor game. The others I like. If Banfield gets dropped, he'll be sub you can count on it.