Re: Hawks vs Sydney Swans (Semi Final)
Wow, what a weekend. Ups, downs and about 300 beers.
What'd I miss?
Wow, what a weekend. Ups, downs and about 300 beers.
What'd I miss?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
yep - they were getting owned in the 3rd qtr. Were dead on their feet and Saints were all over them.
were very lucky to win for mine. everything went their way.
Wow, what a weekend. Ups, downs and about 300 beers.
What'd I miss?
This is an idiotic comment.
The one thing I don't want to do is show no respect to the club with the best culture in the AFL.
The Swans play with total committment and unbelievable discipline - they rarely give away dumb free kicks, they don't carry on when they get a free paid against them. They remain cool under pressure and are always ALWAYS at the contest. Mick Malthouse said earlier this year that if you want to know about playing in finals just play against Sydney as they play like that all the time.
They don't have nearly the amount of talent we have but we disrespect them and what they have built at our peril. If we play with a quarter of their heart and spirit then we should win. But beware of Adam Goodes, the man is a freak and playing the very best football of his 300 game career - would like to see our boys, win lose or draw, clap him off the field as that kind of the sort of respect that should be showed to champions of the game.
Few observations:
-A key reason our side had appeared to improve this year was the pace injection brought on by the new guys. Yet we went into a crunch final with one outside runner (bateman as sub doesn't count) and a bunch of midfield plodders - and got cut up in the middle and on the transition and couldn't find players in space. We looked really slow on the weekend.
-Hodge and mitchell don't look fully fit - add that to lewis and sewell in the middle and we are treacle slow (and get dominated in the clearences). We need to give burgoyne more time in the middle - if hodge has to spend some time back and/or lewis up forward then so be it. WX should also be given some stints in the middle to provide a bit of energy. Lewis is not a winger
-Savage has to come in. It's a real pity bateman is out of form and TBH there's not much else. Suckling could also be pushed up onto a wing
-We need Rioli to spend more time in the middle but its clear he's either not fit or injured. Rioli was outstanding in the pre-season off half back - think we need to try it again. Will get him into the game and free up birch to be more attacking.
-Breust was really poor - doesn't attack the contest hard enough which was shown up by the cats and will likely again by the swans. Needs to be sub when the heat has gone out of the game.
-While I want Stratton back our backline looks too reactive with shoe, gibbo, murphy,guerra and stratts down back, with only birchall and maybe suckling providing any real run. Not sure murphy has a good match up - bruce may be a better option on ROK as can play further up the ground and has a big tank and can also play as a hitup fwd. We seem to have too many defenders - murphy, guerra, suckling and pops is a lot of small defenders who can't go into the midfield.
-Lisle is really the only tall option to replace buddy, however if plays fwd is more suited to a deep fwd role which conflicts with Hale. We may consider pushing lisle back and shoe to CHF at times. Hale will need to be on his game to neutrialise the rucks so I dont think we can expect him to play as the sole tall fwd and also 2nd ruck
-Other than goodes, mumford and ROK, mcglynn has been handy for the swans - a great matchup for puopolo
This is a bit out there but:
Suckling Gibson Stratts
Birchall Shoe Rioli
Smith Burgoyne Savage
WX Lisle Hodge
Ossie Hale Puopolo
Bailey Mitch Sewell
Int: Shiels, Lewis, Bruce, Sub: Breust
In: Savage, Bruce, Stratts, Lisle
Out: Bateman, guerra, murphy, buddy
yep - they were getting owned in the 3rd qtr. Were dead on their feet and Saints were all over them.
were very lucky to win for mine. everything went their way.
"Owned in the third quarter" ... how does that explain the second and fourth quarters?
This is an idiotic comment.
The one thing I don't want to do is show no respect to the club with the best culture in the AFL.
The Swans play with total committment and unbelievable discipline - they rarely give away dumb free kicks, they don't carry on when they get a free paid against them. They remain cool under pressure and are always ALWAYS at the contest. Mick Malthouse said earlier this year that if you want to know about playing in finals just play against Sydney as they play like that all the time.
They don't have nearly the amount of talent we have but we disrespect them and what they have built at our peril. If we play with a quarter of their heart and spirit then we should win. But beware of Adam Goodes, the man is a freak and playing the very best football of his 300 game career - would like to see our boys, win lose or draw, clap him off the field as that kind of the sort of respect that should be showed to champions of the game.
I'm not having a go because I didn't watch the game but in answer to your question here I would say that owning the 3rd Q has nothing to do with any explanations of the 2nd and 4th quarters.
Few observations:
-A key reason our side had appeared to improve this year was the pace injection brought on by the new guys. Yet we went into a crunch final with one outside runner (bateman as sub doesn't count) and a bunch of midfield plodders - and got cut up in the middle and on the transition and couldn't find players in space. We looked really slow on the weekend.
-Hodge and mitchell don't look fully fit - add that to lewis and sewell in the middle and we are treacle slow (and get dominated in the clearences). We need to give burgoyne more time in the middle - if hodge has to spend some time back and/or lewis up forward then so be it. WX should also be given some stints in the middle to provide a bit of energy. Lewis is not a winger
-Savage has to come in. It's a real pity bateman is out of form and TBH there's not much else. Suckling could also be pushed up onto a wing
-We need Rioli to spend more time in the middle but its clear he's either not fit or injured. Rioli was outstanding in the pre-season off half back - think we need to try it again. Will get him into the game and free up birch to be more attacking.
-Breust was really poor - doesn't attack the contest hard enough which was shown up by the cats and will likely again by the swans. Needs to be sub when the heat has gone out of the game.
-While I want Stratton back our backline looks too reactive with shoe, gibbo, murphy,guerra and stratts down back, with only birchall and maybe suckling providing any real run. Not sure murphy has a good match up - bruce may be a better option on ROK as can play further up the ground and has a big tank and can also play as a hitup fwd. We seem to have too many defenders - murphy, guerra, suckling and pops is a lot of small defenders who can't go into the midfield.
-Lisle is really the only tall option to replace buddy, however if plays fwd is more suited to a deep fwd role which conflicts with Hale. We may consider pushing lisle back and shoe to CHF at times. Hale will need to be on his game to neutrialise the rucks so I dont think we can expect him to play as the sole tall fwd and also 2nd ruck
-Other than goodes, mumford and ROK, mcglynn has been handy for the swans - a great matchup for puopolo
This is a bit out there but:
Suckling Gibson Stratts
Birchall Shoe Rioli
Smith Burgoyne Savage
WX Lisle Hodge
Ossie Hale Puopolo
Bailey Mitch Sewell
Int: Shiels, Lewis, Bruce, Sub: Breust
In: Savage, Bruce, Stratts, Lisle
Out: Bateman, guerra, murphy, buddy
What an ignorant comment.
"Owned in the third quarter" ... how does that explain the second and fourth quarters?
It's amusing to see how this thread has fluctuated since Friday night/Saturday morning.
One thing about most Swans fans; we're not prone to complacency. You blokes are a far better side than St Kilda, but we're there and in good form. We're a chance.