Strategy Should we trade Dangerfield?

[Smoocher]

If Danger really wants to leave would Crows accept ready made hard nut Greenwood and our 1st round pick for Danger.

 

[Glenno23]

If Danger really wants to leave would Crows accept ready made hard nut Greenwood and our 1st round pick for Danger.

Probably not

 

[footy4ever]

If Danger really wants to leave would Crows accept ready made hard nut Greenwood and our 1st round pick for Danger.

Crows mightn't but i'm in.

 

[Smoocher]

Probably not

What if we throw in a Mullet (outside run) as well.

 

[IFBB]

Apparently COMFIRMED that Danger is seeking a trade now the GF is over lol

 

[Bailey01]

Apparently COMFIRMED that Danger is seeking a trade now the GF is over lol

huh

 

[Glenno23]

What if we throw in a Mullet (outside run) as well.

I'll just keep Danger thanks

huh

There was a troll news site set up and posted that "Now that the GF is over, Dangerfield has requested a trade"

 

[lincsPJ]

OMG!! Sloane is going to the Hawks!!

This board sometimes and the panic over Danger leaving

wrong. hawks fans are following clarko to adelaide.

 

[Bicks]

What if we throw in a Mullet (outside run) as well.

Ahaaa so this is the "big fish" several of our supporters with sauces refer to...I get it now!!

 

[IFBB]

Full of typos everywhere too lol

 

[IFBB]

Full of typos everywhere too lol

 

[FR0GGY]

Ahaaa so this is the "big fish" several of our supporters with sauces refer to...I get it now!!

your about 2 weeks late to the party

 

[cmndstab]

Full of typos everywhere too lol

Unfortunately that's pretty much standard for an actual news release.

 

[baldandbroke]

Love this article:

Collingwood hope to replace Dayne Beams with Patrick Dangerfield in a blockbuster trade

COLLINGWOOD will demand a player of the calibre of Adelaide’s Patrick Dangerfield if they lose Dayne Beams to Brisbane.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/a...lockbuster-trade/story-fn69a32t-1227070763346

How does that work??? So Beams goes to Brisbane and Collingwood demand Dangerfield

 

[The Karma Bus]

Love this article:

Collingwood hope to replace Dayne Beams with Patrick Dangerfield in a blockbuster trade

COLLINGWOOD will demand a player of the calibre of Adelaide’s Patrick Dangerfield if they lose Dayne Beams to Brisbane.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/a...lockbuster-trade/story-fn69a32t-1227070763346

How does that work??? So Beams goes to Brisbane and Collingwood demand Dangerfield

Yeah Ed, maybe the AFC should have a reverse COLA too and have 9.8% less salary cap than everyone else to make up for the Swans having COLA..

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Love this article:

Collingwood hope to replace Dayne Beams with Patrick Dangerfield in a blockbuster trade

COLLINGWOOD will demand a player of the calibre of Adelaide’s Patrick Dangerfield if they lose Dayne Beams to Brisbane.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/a...lockbuster-trade/story-fn69a32t-1227070763346

How does that work??? So Beams goes to Brisbane and Collingwood demand Dangerfield

Collingwood logic...

 

[tigris72]

Has there been a time where the senior coach, CEO and captain (even acting like Danger) departed a club at the same time? If Danger was to leave...wow that would be a culture shift.

 

[Pleasedontfail11]

Hypothetical:

If Danger requested a trade to Collingwood would
Aish, Collingwood's second pick and Brisbane's second pick get the deal done?
Or would you prefer pick 4 rather than Aish?

 

[Elite Crow]

Hypothetical:

If Danger requested a trade to Collingwood would
Aish, Collingwood's second pick and Brisbane's second pick get the deal done?
Or would you prefer pick 4 rather than Aish?

You'd have to ask the list managers that as they make the decisions.

No offence to you but I find trade hypotheticals the most pointless posts on Big Footy considering no one on Big Footy has a say on any trades.

 

[The Sloane Ranger]

You'd have to ask the list managers that as they make the decisions.

No offence to you but I find trade hypotheticals the most pointless posts on Big Footy considering no one on Big Footy has a say on any trades.

Each year the BF List Mangers put up there Hypothetical trades with a 0.01% success rate

 

[FR0GGY]

Hypothetical:

If Danger requested a trade to Collingwood would
Aish, Collingwood's second pick and Brisbane's second pick get the deal done?
Or would you prefer pick 4 rather than Aish?

Agree with elite crow, but I'm pretty sure we would be wanting a high first rounder rather than multiple second rounders.

 

[footy4ever]

Full of typos everywhere too lol

Those funny crazy, however illiterate, power supporters.

 

[MRB37]

Each year the BF List Mangers put up there Hypothetical trades with a 0.01% success rate

I knew Smack and Graham would be delisted. My strike rate is sitting at 100% this offseason.

That's it, I'm kicking Noble out and taking this sumbitch over.

 

[Mismatched]

Hypothetical:

If Danger requested a trade to Collingwood would
Aish, Collingwood's second pick and Brisbane's second pick get the deal done?
Or would you prefer pick 4 rather than Aish?

No, I doubt it would get it done, pick 4 plus Aish is probably about what would it would take to get it done. Danger is widely regarded as a top 5 midfielder in the competition, he is contracted and has enormous marketing potential, you have to expect to fork out a fair bit for such a player.

You'd have to ask the list managers that as they make the decisions.

No offence to you but I find trade hypotheticals the most pointless posts on Big Footy considering no one on Big Footy has a say on any trades.

With all due respect EC, if being "pointless" was a reason not to post on BigFooty, then BigFooty would cease to exist. This is a thread discussing whether we should trade Dangerfield, I see no reason why people shouldn't discuss his worth at the same time, in fact its intrinsically linked, if you don't like or don't want to get involved with the subject matter, its simple don't read the thread, or reply to the posts.

 

[intheknowcrow]

No, I doubt it would get it done, pick 4 plus Aish is probably about what would it would take to get it done. Danger is widely regarded as a top 5 midfielder in the competition, he is contracted and has enormous marketing potential, you have to expect to fork out a fair bit for such a player.



With all due respect EC, if being "pointless" was a reason not to post on BigFooty, then BigFooty would cease to exist. This is a thread discussing whether we should trade Dangerfield, I see no reason why people shouldn't discuss his worth at the same time, in fact its intrinsically linked, if you don't like or don't want to get involved with the subject matter, its simple don't read the thread, or reply to the posts.

What about pick 2 & Hogan ?