Preview State of the list 2013

Remove this Banner Ad

joefootylover

All Australian
Sep 15, 2005
689
450
Melburne
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
collingwood
Hi all, lots of threads floating round, but I wanted to solicit a bit more of an in depth discussion so I wrote this up:

STATE OF THE LIST:

First of all, does anyone really think we would have lost to the Swans if we had the 14 day break and they had the 6? if we played at the G instead of ANZ? If we added Ball, Didak and Maxwell and they added McGlyn? No excuses, but we finish 3rd this year IMO, having beaten Adelaide in Adelaide by 5 goals and running away on a wet sail, and have been the equal of the Swans, losing the prelim more because of circumstance than list talent. That leaves one side that was better than us all year, the Hawks, that is where we are at.

Some perspective. We lost our senior coach last year, and two of his three senior assistants went else where for senior gigs. We lost the AA back pocket and the player literally synonymous with the second ruck role in the era of 3 rotations and a sub in Leroy. We had 4 knee reconstructions, 3 shoulder reconstructions, 1 broken leg, a former player and great friend to many at the club died tragically in the middle of our finals campaign… I could go on. Despite all this we finished top 4, we made it to a prelim and we kicked more than ten goals in the final and where not disgraced, did not bow our heads, fought on till the last siren. I am a proud Pies supporter today.

A little more perspective. Last year the Hawthorn footy club had a run with injuries that was just as horrendous as ours this year. They pumped games into players and it has paid of in spades for them this year. We can expect significant benefits to the development of Paine, Elliot, Sinclair, Seedsman, Mooney, Young, Keeffe and Williams for having gotten games they otherwise wouldn't have this year.

Even more. Goodes, Bolton, O'Keefe, Rhyce, Mattner and Richards, blokes who tore us up in the prelim will all be over 30 next year, the Swans simply do not have the age profile to go again in 2013. Contrast to us, Pendles 25, Shaw 27, Harry 26, Cloke 25, Thomas 25, Dawes 24, Brown 24, Reid 23, Beams 23, Blair 22, Sidebottom 22 (people forget that when they bag his finals performance). the core of our group, the match winners, are overwhelmingly in their mid 20's and will compete at this level for years to come.

Take a look at our likely list for 2013:

FB: Toovey Brown Shaw
HB: O'Brien Reid Maxwell

C: Thomas Swan Sidebottom

HF: Fasolo Dawes Wellingham
FF: Krakouer Cloke Goldsack

R: Jolly Beams Pendles

INT:
Blair
Ball
Didak

Didak, Krakouer and Jolly are the only blokes in the above group over 30 in season 2013. Johnno, assuming he gets another year like he's asking for, will be 32, but I have him in the VFL below, mentoring the younger group and competing for selection as the seventh defender with the likes of Clarke, Seedsman and Williams.

VFL:
FB: Hartley Keeffe Stewart
HB: Yagmoor Gault Seedsman

C: Johnson Clarke Williams

HF: Elliot Paine Sinclair
FF: Macaffer Celgar Mooney

R: Witts J.Thomas Young

Look at the AFL experience in the VFL team! Keeffe, Seedsman, Johnno, Clakre, Williams, Elliot, Paine, Sinclair, Macaffer, Mooney, Young… not to mention that Josh Thomas, Celgar, Witts and Gault where all pushing for senior selection late and couldn't quite break through.

OFF:
Tarrant
Wood
Buckley
Rounds
Ugle

Again, assuming we give Johnno another year, and I am hesitant, with the above changes we have room to make 3 selections in the draft, take Stewart as a father son in the 4th round, and upgrade one of Mooney or Williams into the bargain.

OFF ROOKIE:
Cribben
Shae
Smith
Farmer
Stubbs

The rookie list shrinks next year, but we have already cleared out what we don't need, and we look lean and mean to me.

So what we need to do: We need to secure Cloke. he played every game this year. right now he is top 5 for goals kicked this season inclusive of finals. he kicked 2.3 in a low scoring prelim, he kicked 5 against the Hawks. He once again took DOZENS more contested marks this year than anyone else. He is a Champion, he is 25, and with support he can structure up our forward line for years to come.

Second we need to double down and back this list and this coaching team in. Bucks and co would have learn't an enormous amount this season about how to run a footy team. The players would have learn't an enormous amount about the new faces in Harvey and Hart. The group, both the playing group and the coaching group, is young, is learning, and has plenty of room for improvement. When all your best players are over 30 and your coach has had a decade, then is the time to shake things up, when all your best players (bar Jolly) are mid 20's and your coach is in his first year, that is the time for doubling down, for incremental improvement, for stability.

Some of the things people around the traps seem to be calling for are unwarranted IMO, especially around the ruck situation. We have too many rucks not too few. Jolly will go around again next year and Dawes, Keeffe, Celgar and Witts will all be competing to be his understudy. I would delist Wood, as I indicate above, even if he has a year to go on his contract, pay him out. Modern footy requires that the second ruck man can play another position so they don't occupy a rotation on the bench, Wood cannot do that, Jolly is better than Wood, and Witts, Keeffe, Celgar or even Gault could all go past Wood by next year. We can't have ruck men in evey position on the ground at VFL level, it is just too much, so we need to let Wood go, and we need to AVOID drafting or trading for more rucks unless they are obviously better than what we have, then we need to delist one to make room.

Jolly
Dawes
Keeffe
Witts
Celgar
Gault

Six rucks is enough when you can only really play 4 in position across AFL and VFL teams.

The next point is regarding delisting Young. that is madness in my opinion. He is a young kid, he his tall, and his frame looks like it could add a LOT of weight. Have a look at what the 188cm 96kg Kennedy did to us, have a look at what the 92kg Dangerfield does to teams. midfielders who can sustain a playing weight over 90kg don't grow on trees, here is a bloke who is 20 years old, neew to the game from NSW scholarship program, and has under 10 games at AFL level. We would be dead set mad to delist him.

Delisting Yagmoor would also be totally unfair to the kid. he is still only 18 years old. in the old days at Williamstown he would have been lucky to get a game at VFL level let alone at AFl level, he would be on a standard 2 year contract and the club should honour that contract because to do otherwise would be to betray a teenage kid who has been one hundred percent professional in his approach and commitment to the club.

In summary, we have as good a list as any side in the competition. It will improve over the next few years simply because most of our key players are young, just hitting the sweet spot of mid 20's with 100 AFL games. To take two examples, Dawes, Brown and Reid are all under 25, all under 80 games. for KPP players you an expect significant improvements in both consistency and output as the players push to 25, 26, 27 and 100+ AFL games. That is the bulk of our spine that should improve next year, and then the year after again. Beams is 22, Rusty is 21, hell Pendles is only 24. the core of our midfield should improve next year. When the core of your midfield and the bulk of your spine should all improve, the side should improve, full stop.

The real area of focus: Pace with disposal. Davis gone last year, Didak with one more year at most. Johnno on his last legs, Wellingham still unsigned. We need to focus on finding outside pace with accurate and penetrating disposal. Seedsman, Mooney, Sinclair are a good start, but we need to add to that in the draft, outside pace that can hit a target is what our side needs more than rucks, more than KPP, more than inside mids, more than anything. Outside pace that can hit a target, repeat after me.

Looking forward to 2013, GO PIES!
 
Good post.

FYI, Cameron Wood's contract is up this year. 90% chance in my book he will get de-listed as we have Ceglar/Witts to cover him and so we can develop those 2.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I am not a fan of Kris tbh, he is a good VFL player no doubt but I really think he will struggle at AFL level, too slow and I don't think he uses the ball well much as well.

I guess if the club decided to rookie him, I wouldn't complain much because we don't know how he will develop but from what I have seen I would say no.
 
I am not a fan of Kris tbh, he is a good VFL player no doubt but I really think he will struggle at AFL level, too slow and I don't think he uses the ball well much as well.

I guess if the club decided to rookie him, I wouldn't complain much because we don't know how he will develop but from what I have seen I would say no.


I can't profess to have seen a lot of VFL games but from what I have seen he has used the ball very well.
 
Backline is too top heavy imo. One of O'Brien or Maxwell are going to have to reinvent themselves to stay in the best 22.
Which I have been thinking for a while with all this tagged talk. Obviously he is a great general down back but if Keeffe and Brown can hold down the key posts, Reid is a gun intercept marker and would be an excellent 3rd tall/loose man in defense. May make us a little too tall though.

Which brings me to my point..could Maxwell become that midfield tagged? He's very disciplined and hard at it. He could do it but not sure how our midfield mix may change.
 
We really need a small quick defensive player.
Someone who can tag a midfielder or mind the dangerous small forward types like Rioli. Harry has a lot of positives but this role is NOT for him.
 
Not sure how you get "top heavy" from O'Brien. he is a 188cm back flanker ranked 5th in the league for total rebound 50's this year so far inclusive of finals. Maxwell is a 3rd tall defender/ zoning defender, most sides have at least that much height in defence if not more.

If you are thinking ahead to when Keeffe cements a spot in the backline I agree with you, but that will happen over the course of 2013, and even into 2014, by which time Maxy will be looking at retirement not reinvention.
 
The next point is regarding delisting Young. that is madness in my opinion. He is a young kid, he his tall, and his frame looks like it could add a LOT of weight. Have a look at what the 188cm 96kg Kennedy did to us, have a look at what the 92kg Dangerfield does to teams. midfielders who can sustain a playing weight over 90kg don't grow on trees, here is a bloke who is 20 years old, neew to the game from NSW scholarship program, and has under 10 games at AFL level. We would be dead set mad to delist him.

I agree so wholeheartedly on this point. Tom Young cops way too much abuse for his level of output at AFL level. I understand there are question marks on his disposal, but I've always been impressed with his ability to win the contests he can get to. As he matures, his ability to reach more contests will improve, and he'll become a contested ball winning machine. The Hawks delisted Josh Kennedy for reasons eerily similar to those we could delist Young for now, if we chose to - non-elite disposal, average decision making, struggling when he plays VFL football. But he always had the ability to win contested ball. Now that the rest has clicked for him, and he has the frame to play AFL, he's the best player in the league, at the moment. Tom will never reach those heights, but a potential contested ball winning, 90+ kg mid is something worth persisting with, in my opinion.
 
Not sure how you get "top heavy" from O'Brien. he is a 188cm back flanker ranked 5th in the league for total rebound 50's this year so far inclusive of finals. Maxwell is a 3rd tall defender/ zoning defender, most sides have at least that much height in defence if not more.

If you are thinking ahead to when Keeffe cements a spot in the backline I agree with you, but that will happen over the course of 2013, and even into 2014, by which time Maxy will be looking at retirement not reinvention.

lol I forgot that Tarrant retired :D.We were definitely top heavy down there this year.

I'll slightly change my point and say that I'm still really worried at how we have defended when the ball has hit the ground in the back 50. O'Brien and Maxwell may be mid sized defenders but they are play like tall defenders when the ball hits the deck. One of our problems this year has been leaking goals whenever it seems go in there on the deck. Carlton beat us the second time round by bringing into the 50 on the deck so they could exploit this. Probably the best example though was versus Hawthorn the last two times where we were just opened by their smalls far too many times. It's gotten to the stage that the opposition look like they're going to score every time they get it in within 50.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Problem with most Collingwood supporters is that we overrate our list.

Keeffe - surprised me after I bagged him so he will improve the team.
Paine - potentially the best of the younger brigade.
Elliot - prepared to give him another go, superior to Sinclair IMO
Sinclair - average pace, poor kicking skills = average player
Mooney - time will tell
Young - average pace, poor kicking skills = average player
Williams - overrated.

Defensively we are missing a James Clement type. Harry O was shown up so many times this year against the smaller forwards.

Defensively we are missing a long kick in specialist - Shannon Hurn type.

Defensively we need more drive as Shaw is now tagged out of the game more often than not.

Defensively we need to stop turning the ball over.

Defensively we need to stop giving way stupid costly free kicks.

Midfield we need a lot more pace. Beams, Swan, Pendlebury & Sidebottom arent exactly quick. We need players to focus on the games not worry about their hairdos & tattoos. We need more goals from these guys.

Forward we need to resign Cloke and give him support. We need a genuine small forward ie. Ballantyne. Fasolo needs to get fitter and rotate through the midfield. Dawes needs to spend a long time in the two's. Give Paine first crack.

Ruck we need another genuine ruck who can rest forward and provide another target. I like Martin.

Coach - Bucks did a great job. Look at the injury list 4 knee reconstructions.

Malthouse may have won us a premiership but he is a sour old bastard not to mention a liar and now coaching Carlscum.

Harvey - Champion player. I credit him for Beams breakout year. Deserves another go.

Lappin \ Hart ditch

Game Plan

Our poor kicking for goal dictates that we need to get the ball to the top of the square more often than not. This chipping to the boundary line inside 50 is low percentage stuff.

Bring on 2013.
 
Backline is too top heavy imo. One of O'Brien or Maxwell are going to have to reinvent themselves to stay in the best 22.

Maxwell should reinvent himself as a forward then heath shaw can make more bets.
 
Keeffe should get a game in the 22 next year.
Toovey has no brain, shit kick and needs to be replaced asap! Maybe Andy Otten?

Toovey might have no brain and be a shit kick but right now we have noone to other than him to defend competently against opposition forwards. He might be poor as an attacking player but is very very good defensively - I'd guess that he'd be on of the first picked amongst the defenders and is definitely more value to use than Maxwell or O'Brien
 
All about balance IMO, Toovey is a good pure defender, Shaw and O'Brien both good rebounders, Ried good attack, Brown good defence, Maxy has heart and intelligence if not loads of talent. Point is that back six is the basic back six of both this years prelim, last years granny and 2010's premiership. It is not too old, only Maxy is 29, the rest could go round till at least 2014, and they provide a benchmark that Keeffe, Seedsman, Williams, etc will have to match and surpass to get regular games. It's a pretty high bar, actually, as we have been one of the best sides with one of the best defences, for at least 4 years, and Reid, Brown, and Harry are all yet to hit their prime age wise.
 
Good OP and a nice read, mate.

I honestly think we ought to look at shuffling Harry or Shaw onto the wing permanently. They are both proven line breakers and while they might not be Lewis Jetta fast, they run rings around typical one-paced midfielders.

Harry has issues with containing the small forwards when they get out the back or when the high ball comes in. Putting him on the wing minimises his weak points and maximises his strength. He's not a precision kicker though, so he'll need to work on that.

Shaw has been trialled on the wing and I think he would excel in the role if we could cover what he provides in the back half. In the Eagles game, when we got on top, Shaw on numerous occasions left his man and burst forward from the HBF, becoming an avenue for line breaking forward thrusts. While Shaw is a much better 1-on-1 player than Harry, he's not good at making decisions when the pace of the game is slow. He's a decent kick, but taking in the kick-ins just illustrates why he's so much better when he's running around and not standing still.

One of Yagmoor (if he has a good preseason and shows good VFL form), Williams (if he improves his kicking), Clarke (if he becomes more physical and runs faster than a turtle) and Seedsman (if we teach him to play as a defender) are options to replace them in the back half. Keeffe in for Tarrant will immediately balance us better too as I think Keeffe could be our Dustin Fletcher. He's still got a long way to go obviously, but I think the potential's there. He can shut down KPFs, has arms that extend for kms, surprisingly quick for his size, good solid boot and can read the play really well.

We could probably trade or draft some good ball users in the back half, but I think we have the cattle down back if we can get them up to speed.

Also, Maxwell as a tagger might be something worth discussing. The midfield balance might change a bit, but we're essentially bringing in Ball and Maxy for Sidebottom/Blair. Come to think of it, Sidebottom as a tagger might be something worth discussing for the slower inside types.
 
Thanks for the detailed post Joe, like some of your ideas and planning suggestions and enjoyed reading them.

I always take the view that a side must find a couple of ' new ' players each season, They can be from trade, draft or improvement. I know we have genuine players returning, but we have to look to at a minimum 2 of Mooney, Seeds,Thomas, Paine etc to come through and be starting 22 by the part way through 2013.
I'd like to see one or two knocking the door down by Round 1.
Re the rucks, yes agree in number we are well covered. A call must be made on the where Witts and Ceglar are at in terms of development and assess if they can fill the gap that Jols will leave and make it a seamless and positive transition. If the answer in they will take another 2 years we must make the appropriate list addition.

Can i just say in no way does Benny S met the criteria for speed and sharp disposal, least skilled kick on our list. Sidebottom has played some excellent finals in previous campaigns as an extremely young player, to me we need to settle him into a role, not so much a postion but a role.
While i do not support the retention of Buckley, i couldnt help wonder today returning from the game, that he was treated harshly this year. We know he was dropped , and left out, due to horrific disposal errors. His demotion from the team certainly did not elimate these horrendous disposal errors..
Lastly, i hope nobody is now in disagreement on retaining Cloke, lets hope is being resolved as we type this.
 
Heath shaw has more rebound 50's than any other player in the comp. pretty good for a player who is "tagged out of the game more often than not".

Think you missed the point. This tactic was used this year by other teams to great effect. We lost our drive from defence and nobody stepped up. So when he is tagged out of the game what are the options from the backline?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Preview State of the list 2013

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top