Media Swans Talk in the Media 2024

Our club in the Media

Remove this Banner Ad

The absolute ****ing crucifixion of Heeney in the media is an absolute joke. The club should come out on the attack to highlight the difference in reporting of incidents. They should also put in a public and formal complaint with Ross Lyon making comment and potentially influencing the MRO prior to his decision.

The "crucifixtion is done to generate clicks, content and engagement.
The footy shows (360, couch etc) will then have something to chat about this evening.
David Zita will be 3 schnitties deep by the time its finished.
 
When the biggest thug ever, Lethal Leigh, comes out and says Heeney is guilty, you know there's a big Melbourne push to have him hung!

Spare me, how was he to know the useless St Scum defender would have his head half way down to the ground?? No way can it be deemed "high contact"?

Also what about the "good bloke" precedent with Cameron earlier in the year?? If our legal counsel can't get him off, he should be sacked immediately.

Leigh has lived in Queensland last 25 years - still a director on Lions board
 

Log in to remove this ad.

AFL doesn’t like * next to names on Brownlow night.

And as for that goon The Sewer claiming it was no different to Gaff - shows the level of intellect in this debate.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Not sure we can take that for Granted.

It’s all in the wording of the directive - it says something like - ‘will USUALLY result in a grading of intentional’

I would argue this is not ‘usual’

- The tackling player slipped and this brought his headdown to waist heigh

- the tackling player was actually ‘hanging on’ and Heeney’s clear intent was to clear the tackle, not strike the player

-Heeney was not watching the tackling player at poc.

- How can a clear accident be intentional?
 
It’s all in the wording of the directive - it says something like - ‘will USUALLY result in a grading of intentional’

I would argue this is not ‘usual’

- The tackling player slipped and this brought his headdown to waist heigh

- the tackling player was actually ‘hanging on’ and Heeney’s clear intent was to clear the tackle, not strike the player

-Heeney was not watching the tackling player at poc.

- How can a clear accident be intentional?
Agree with most of this but to clarify the grading is intentional in terms of, did Heeney intend to make contact with any part of Webster or did he intend to make contact with the ball. So a player attempting a spoil and accidentally punching someone would be judged unintentional while pushing off from the mark is intentional.
 
Agree with most of this but to clarify the grading is intentional in terms of, did Heeney intend to make contact with any part of Webster or did he intend to make contact with the ball. So a player attempting a spoil and accidentally punching someone would be judged unintentional while pushing off from the mark is intentional.
The directive opens a huge can of worms -


You can hospitalise a guy with a pretend effort to gain a ‘lift’ with your knee - accident - no case to answer.

You can cause a blood nose trying to break an illegal tackle, without looking at the player, and at waist height - accident but called intentional - and get a week.
 
The directive opens a huge can of worms -


You can hospitalise a guy with a pretend effort to gain a ‘lift’ with your knee - accident - no case to answer.

You can cause a blood nose trying to break an illegal tackle, without looking at the player, and at waist height - accident but called intentional - and get a week.
The whole system is an absolute mare. Excuse the pun.
 
Robbo dismissing the similarity to BZT because Heeney is a forward not a defender? Wtf?
Super Troopers Smh GIF by Searchlight Pictures
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Media Swans Talk in the Media 2024

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top