No Oppo Supporters Tanner Bruhn interviewed by police over incident from 2023

[Zouz Kitty]

They're already walking it back online. It's halfway down their page and is now this.

View attachment 2132226

Who wrote that article, Joe?

The original article was libellous.

 

[mac_cat]

Who wrote that article, Joe?

The original article was libellous.

I saw a tweet about it from Jon Ralph, when Geelong was trending. Not sure if he wrote the article, because it’s paywalled.

 

[dazbroncos]

Click bait bloggers at best.

Real Journo's dont write shit like that.

The OP insinuates direct involvement in the incident that has now be walked back to being asked about what he may or may not have been a witness to.

Massive difference and just shits me to tears when people do this crap without any retribution back at the OP for misleading and false headlines.

GO Catters

 

[Zouz Kitty]

I saw a tweet about it from Jon Ralph, when Geelong was trending. Not sure if he wrote the article, because it’s paywalled.View attachment 2132233

That’s where I saw Ralphie’s tweet.

Was that tweet edited?

An hour ago

 

[GoCatters07]

There are 3 journalists listed - Jon Ralph, Fergus Ellis and Brooke Grebert-Craig

Jon Ralph is a grub

 

[Munich]

Of course it's Ralph

 

[Strange Cat]

Click bait bloggers at best.

Real Journo's dont write shit like that.

The OP insinuates direct involvement in the incident that has now be walked back to being asked about what he may or may not have been a witness to.

Massive difference and just shits me to tears when people do this crap without any retribution back at the OP for misleading and false headlines.

GO Catters

Sadly that’s the industry these days …gone are the days where the industry had integrity it’s all about the clicks and ad revenue over proper journalism which as much as what you said in your post

I would be getting my lawyer involved if I was Bruhn personally

 

[MisterMarcus]

'Sexual assault he may have witnessed'.

Kind of sounds like one of his mates - or someone he was with - was getting handsy and gropey with a woman, and he either saw or was suspected of seeing it.

Then I guess it depends on his reaction:

* If he did nothing, or thought it was funny or something, then absolutely that would be scumbag behaviour.

* If he tried to get his mate to stop or pulled him away, then he's done the right thing and the initial story is disgraceful stuff.

* If he didn't see it or know much about it, then he's been dragged into it a bit unfairly. I can see why the police would want to talk to him, but again the initial story is horribly slanted.

 

[you pick one]

19 months on and police are only interviewing a potential witness now.I hate these cases on all sorts of levels.

 

[Warhorse]

Clearly more to the story.

 

[My Tilly]

Clearly more to the story.

Is there?

 

[Kitcat]

It’s much harder for people to remember what exactly happened after such a long delay since the incident.

 

[The_Koulouriotis_Fan]

'Sexual assault he may have witnessed'.

Kind of sounds like one of his mates - or someone he was with - was getting handsy and gropey with a woman, and he either saw or was suspected of seeing it.

Then I guess it depends on his reaction:

* If he did nothing, or thought it was funny or something, then absolutely that would be scumbag behaviour.

* If he tried to get his mate to stop or pulled him away, then he's done the right thing and the initial story is disgraceful stuff.

* If he didn't see it or know much about it, then he's been dragged into it a bit unfairly. I can see why the police would want to talk to him, but again the initial story is horribly slanted.

All of the above or it could also mean that he was literally just present where the incident is alleged to have occurred, he may have seen nothing.