The ARC. FIFA must just laugh at it.

Remove this Banner Ad

Footy has more right to be called football over soccer due to the fact it actually predates soccer as a sport
Honestly, this is a very 1990s argument. Now that Australia has been exposed to global sports via streaming platforms, I think there's a reasonable amount of acceptance that all of AFL, the two Rugby codes, soccer and gridiron can be called football.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Footy has more right to be called football over soccer due to the fact it actually predates soccer as a sport
Extremely bad call. Soccer "Football" is played probably 95% by foot.
Anyway I much prefer AFL over soccer anyway but I try not to be short sighted.

Simply put - Foot + ball - Football.

Kick, handball, tap, punch/spoil - Football? Can be confusing at times.
 
Last edited:
Extremely bad call. Soccer "Football" is played probably 95% by foot.
Anyway I much prefer AFL over soccer anyway but I try not to be short sighted.

Simply put - Foot + ball - Football.

Kick, handball, tap, punch/spoil - Football? Can be confusing at times.
American “football” is even more of a joke - most players never kick the ball!
 
Some sources say it was originally called football, because it was played 'on foot'. There were lots of ball games played for centuries - Romans had ball games, Inuit played ball games. WE could talk abot Marngrook. Some involved kicking, some involved throwing (eg handball), some carrying (rugby) - every town had it's own rules. Even in Australia, there were a myriad of different sports sports played - sometimes just people mucking about with a ball.

The fact the Australian rules were 'codified' before Association Football is a fun fact to throw at your pommy mates, but really meaningless in relation to today's game. If you read the original Melbourne rules of 1859, almost all of them have been changed or modified along the way - except for a goal must pass between the posts and must not be touched by another player from either side.
 
3 countries play Rugby League, but really, 2 countries play Rugby League. NZ team is made up of guys who werent good enough for the All Blacks.
Actually more than 2, even more than 3.
PNG it’s the national game.
England and the other nations there, Australia, NZ(where it’s is rating and getting better crowds than Union), Pacific Islands, France, Italy.
Just to start
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Can't believe I'm seeing people reeling out the same, tired, vacuous, el blando old 'bUt iT's nOt iNtErNaTiOnAl!' cliches on a football forum in a thread comparing the video systems of soccer and football. This has got to be the dumbest thread I've ever seen in my almost 20 years on BF (and that's saying something), can't believe it's still going a year later. That's 3 minutes of my life I won't get back, and this will be my first and last visit.

🤦‍♂️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♂️
 
Why does the footage always look like its been recorded on a 1990's hand held videocamera.

Don't the broadcasters shoot games in 4k?

Embarassing.
Unless it has changed recently, I 'think' Foxtel use 4k cameras, but Ch 7 don't. So, Ch 7 shot games are upscaled, including the ones shown/simulcast on 4k Foxtel. That means finals, ANZAC Day etc, etc are not native 4k.
The amount of money around these broadcast deals, 4k should be a non-negotiable.
 
I wonder if any FIFA officials decided to have a look at this wierd game that a couple of Australian states refer to as "Football".
They must have a giggle when the AFL use The ARC to help with decisions. It must look very amatuerish compared to their VAR.
Soccer fans are the vegans of the sports world, always thinking they have to force their low-quality shit on everyone else.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The ARC. FIFA must just laugh at it.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top