This question is only being asked because people think Masten is a star now and will breakout due to his NAB cup form. Isn't he always pumped up in the pre-season?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Seriously, can some posters keep bias crap posting like this out of threads not related to the Crows? Judd is obviously a better player than Dangerfield and Otten, but it is still a valid point. I think Carlton would be better off with guys like Harry Taylor, Dangerfield and Kennedy over just the one midfielder in Judd.????
Otten??? Is he a best 22 player?
Dangerfield? Pears? I think Judd is playing better football than these two.
They have Yarran, Gartlett and Betts so I'm not sure Rioli would improve them a whole lot. Dunno how much good Taylor would be if the midfield is getting slaughtered.
Yea, I think Judd might have been a good pick. Armfield is handy too.
I've never seen him play this well in the NAB Cup before, this season is certainly different to previous ones where he has also been pumped up. He could have quite easily gone to Carlton that draft if they had given up pick 1; he was a very highly rated junior for valid reasons.This question is only being asked because people think Masten is a star now and will breakout due to his NAB cup form. Isn't he always pumped up in the pre-season?
Armfield may not be Bruce Doull but at least he does his job. Masten is a bad kick and will only hurt the eagles. Added to that, he only averaged about 14 disposals in his fourth year even though he played 13 games. While he did get used as a sub a few times, the excuses dry out pretty quickly.
At the least, I assume the eagles would hope the gap in performance between Masten and Armfield would be much greater than it currently is.
The eagles have tried him on a flank at times but it fails more than it works it seems. He's struggled to play any other role than midfield, yet there are a number of other players (Kerr, Shuey, Priddis, Gaff, Ebert, S Selwood) who seem more suited to that role. IMO the eagles should trade him before he loses all currency.
Should've traded Fev
We did.
If you had traded Fev instead of Kennedy for Judd you guys would be hot favourites to win the flag.
If anyone needs more proof of why we won out of the Judd deal, just look at Melbourne. Because that's what would've become of us had we not got him.
Maybe not quite as bad as Melbourne, but valid point about the leadership.
We chose well with all our top end picks since 05 (the number 1's and Yarran).
I feel a lot of Carlton haters rate Kennedy because we don't have him now. When he was at Carlton he was considered no more than average potential by many.
Kennedy is very good, but Judd is an all time great and we are certainly better with him.
Yeah, that's why he went Pick 4.
We did.
We are favourites