Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Klopp even thought it was nothing to be fair.Dr Bradesmaen told me it was a cover up, and that Jota (out 3 months) is just timewasting and will be available next game.
Klopp even thought it was nothing to be fair.
Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital have overseen heavy internal restructuring since arriving at Stamford Bridge last year and are understood to have paid close attention to the recruitment model at Brighton
Chelsea copying us.
Chelsea scouts join exodus of backroom staff under new owners
Chelsea’s European scouts Sven Dworaczek and Leonardo Masieri have left for rivals as the club move to greater use of data in search for talentwww.theguardian.com
Yeah I don't think that its a secret we admire your model and are trying to do something similar.
If you're spending 100 million+ on transfers this window you're doing it wrong
If you're spending 100 million+ on transfers this window you're doing it wrong
Why can't they adapt your model to operate at a higher level?
Because then it's not the model we use.
It's a model based around not buying high profile players for large sums of money.
That's the whole point of it.
If you're just spending large sums of money on well known players then that defeats the purpose of implementing it.
The model is identifying players the market undervalues and bringing them in to develop and star in the side and/or sell for multiples on what you paid for them, is it not?
It's not based solely on the market value.
The data used is quite heavily identifying players that fit the style of play that the club wish make all levels of the club to be built around.
They even had a list of managers who are suited to that style should Potter leave.
It's actually all built around what the owner wants in football terms and not what the manager wants which is the opposite to how most clubs let the manager build their own style and vision of how they want their team to play.
This is the team v Everton.
Sanchez - £0
Veltman - £1m
Dunk - £0
Colwill - loan
Estupinan - £17.8m
Caicedo - £5m
Groß - £3m
March - £0
Sarmiento - £0
Mitoma - £3m
Ferguson - £0
All the 0 started in the academy.
Dunk, March and Sanchez are very long term players.
Sarmiento and Ferguson aren't $0 in cost, but undisclosed and not super high profile they were probably in the 500k-2 million range.
That's a lot of words for saying "Yes it's about buying players cheap who fit into our club who we can then sell on for big profits", which is what I said.
Chelsea have bought a few players this window who fit that category - in theory - and are now trying to address a pressing need with Kante and Jorginho and Kovacic all on the decline. Don't really see how that flies in the face of your model. You spent 17m on Estupinan to replace Cucurella, this is no different.
Brighton aren't the only team that use this data driven model either, so it's not all just about them.
Really?
A young player stars at the world cup then next minute they are paying potentially 100 million for that player.
Using our model you'd have bought him before the WC and not after when he's worth a lot more.
See the weird thing is that Chelsea have always had a decent youth program. One of the best ones in the UK.
The problem was the pathway to the first XI was often a very hard task for them to get an opportunity to break into the first team.
So your assertion about it being about buying cheap and selling high is wrong.
It's about having that pathway into the first team open to your youth players.
That's not the moneyball system you seem to be pushing as to what our system is.
They were looking at buying him before the WC but there was the little matter of the takeover of the club that they had to deal with.
They're getting a steal on other big clubs that will be interested in him - Liverpool were already showing interest this window.
As said, you bought Estupinan for 16m, that's not chump change, and the scale of the purchase increases based on the need to the team.
Because we weren't, surely we all know that. That first window was chaos, Boehly was doing it all by himself.Which is a prime example of how they weren't following our model there.
I don't think we paid over or unders for Cucurella or Estupinan though.
Both felt like they were bought at a reasonably spot on zone for such players.
We didn't want to sell Cucurella but Chelsea paid insane overs for him and his head was turned so he went.
Which is a prime example of how they weren't following our model there.
Evan Ferguson had interest from both Liverpool and us.
He chose up because we have a more visible pathway for young players to make the first XI. That's a large component of our model.
As Ben White showed we could have sold him to Leeds for 30 million and made a huge profit still. The model however is also about only selling highly talented players to teams in that upper echelon. Not selling them to teams in the same space as us.
To those teams we sell the likes of Neal Maupay...
Because we weren't, surely we all know that. That first window was chaos, Boehly was doing it all by himself.
We have only recently added Vivell as Technical director, Stewart is still to come from Monaco after this window, Winstanley has been here a month and Shields is still on gardening leave for another couple of months. Thats the team that'll be looking after us.
We haven't even really started yet.
Saudi Arabia buys Ronaldo for a billion dollars
Lands there and calls the place South Africa in his first presser