- Sep 8, 2014
- 17,277
- 24,414
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- There are no other teams
He re-signed bud.
Pretty sure Barrass signed on as well bud.
It’s all good a fair deal will be done for Tom, don’t sweat it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
He re-signed bud.
He won the BnF in 2021, he was traded at the end of 2022...
He had lost a big chunk of his midfield role in 2022 too
He re-signed bud.
There's no way they'll accept the primary pick being next year's and as for Granger, pretty sure that's not going to happen, we have enough list cloggers already.It's one of this year or next years first a third round pick, dgb with barass and a 4thround pick coming back
... yetNo-one is talking about Temu Reid!
For the 10zillionth time nobody wants DGB, he is dead weight in a trade. The fact that you wasted a high pick on him is unfortunate but its not our problem.It's one of this year or next years first a third round pick, dgb with barass and a 4thround pick coming back
True, was thinking when I posted that "you know what in 5 years someone is going to find this thread and bump that comment calling me a nuffy"... yet
He's looking good at the moment. It's making our 'just take Reids' strategy last year look pretty goodTrue, was thinking when I posted that "you know what in 5 years someone is going to find this thread and bump that comment calling me a nuffy"
Nobody stipulated which Reid.Nice clickbait from the Eagles page there. Clicked it half expecting it to be Harley.
Because the relationship is severed, and he is not going back. They are a willing seller and everybody knows thisBarrass is contracted, isn't he? Why should WCE accept unders for him because "it's too much risk for Hawthorn"?
Because the relationship is severed, and he is not going back. They are a willing seller and everybody knows this
Hawks will be generous and give them #13 plus a F3 and the eagles will consider that a win
Well the previous management agreed to what he wantedHang on?
Severed? How do you know it’s severed?
Tom’s issue is with previous management who aren’t there anymore, not the current people.
Seems like a bunch of hyperbole and aggrandising.
Well the previous management agreed to what he wanted
Its this management that wont honour the agreement
his issue is with the current management
Connect the dotsIs it? Do you know that or did you just assume that?
So you're guessing based on BigFooty?Connect the dots
Club Vice captain contracted
Wants to move after protracted disputes with the club about what was promised to stop him moving
Walks out and clears out his locker
wants to join another club and selects Hawks
Info thats been passed on by McGovern
Can you really see him going back
A bad relationship is actually just extra bargaining power for the club of a contracted player. "If you don't help us get the best pick possible then we'll make you come back". The way his time at WCE ended, don't be surprised if Barrass lands at Richmond for pick 1.Because the relationship is severed, and he is not going back. They are a willing seller and everybody knows this
Hawks will be generous and give them #13 plus a F3 and the eagles will consider that a win
was that on the mailbag? havent listened to it yet.Thought a WC poster might have mentioned Daniels on HBG saying he had a quick chat with someone close to it and all signs are this is going to go the distance. WC adamant they want two firsts, Hawks adamant no.
Paraphrasing a bit but that was the gist of it. I still cant see Hawks possibly doing that but hats off to Clarke if he pulls it off
Yeah mailbag, general gist was "strap yourselves in"was that on the mailbag? havent listened to it yet.
Hopefully I didnt just miss it completely from the 2min warning haha
2 firsts is fine as long as we get Eagles 2nd rounder this year coming with BarrassThought a WC poster might have mentioned Daniels on HBG saying he had a quick chat with someone close to it and all signs are this is going to go the distance. WC adamant they want two firsts, Hawks adamant no.
Paraphrasing a bit but that was the gist of it. I still cant see Hawks possibly doing that but hats off to Clarke if he pulls it off
Just listened to it, sounds like west coast and the Hawks are at the same spot as us nuffies are in hereYeah mailbag, general gist was "strap yourselves in"
Barrass +#3 +#13 for Baker +#1A bad relationship is actually just extra bargaining power for the club of a contracted player. "If you don't help us get the best pick possible then we'll make you come back". The way his time at WCE ended, don't be surprised if Barrass lands at Richmond for pick 1.
Well im sure you didnt get the email from the club either so this is a footy forum and we are all just " Connecting the dots"So you're guessing based on BigFooty?