Pretty nasty stuff.
Our best player is probably looking at 4 weeks I'd say.
I'd say it was intentional, severe (maybe high) and then high looking at a guaranteed 3+ at the tribunal.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
His elbow is not even close to being tucked in... take off your blue and white coloured glasses.
View attachment 1433003
His elbow is not even close to being tucked in... take off your blue and white coloured glasses.
View attachment 1433003
His elbow is not even close to being tucked in... take off your blue and white coloured glasses.
View attachment 1433003
It's worth 4 weeks. Anything less than 3 is insufficient for what was a really poor act, anything more than 4 is over the top though.
I thought it was careless rather than intentional personally …everything looks worse when slowed down and replayed frame by frameIt's worth 4 weeks. Anything less than 3 is insufficient for what was a really poor act, anything more than 4 is over the top though.
Yeah it looked like Prestia was slipping down at that moment …incredibly unlucky as Stewart’s feet didn’t leave the ground to hit him highHe will get 2-3 weeks not doubt as he decided to bump just unlucky 15cm lower and would have been a fair hit but the head rightly so is a protected space, Tigers fans are funny saying intentional targeting numpties deluded they are.
Yeah it looked like Prestia was slipping down at that moment …incredibly unlucky as Stewart’s feet didn’t leave the ground to hit him high
Stewart will likely get 3-4 weeks.
But those Richmond fans calling it a sniper act etc are off the mark.
You need to remember these incidents all take place in split seconds and at high speed.
Having seen it live and then on replay countless times, it seems to me that Tom expected Prestia to take possession of the ball. But Prestia chose not to and jumped off the ground to tap the ball to a teammate. Prestia was hit when he was still off balance which contributed to the hit being high and not shoulder to shoulder. Stewart didn’t leave the ground and had his shoulder tucked in, indicating it wasn’t a deliberate hit to the head and there was an element of poor luck for both parties in it being forcefully high.
Obviously the act was extremely poorly executed and he will deserve the suspension he gets, nobody is arguing against that, but Stewart is one of the best executors of the (legal) bump in our team and it’s exactly what he unsuccessfully tried to do here.
If he goes to the tribunal, yes it will be his first timeIs this the first time Stewart been to the tribunal ?.
David King the flog calling for a 6 week suspension.
Tigers supporters seem to have a short memory, Cotchin's bump on Dylan Shiel.
Take no notice of most things Richmond supporters say. Most of them are psychotic and should be in an asylum.Is this the first time Stewart been to the tribunal ?.
David King the flog calling for a 6 week suspension.
Tigers supporters seem to have a short memory, Cotchin's bump on Dylan Shiel.
Pretty nasty stuff.
Our best player is probably looking at 4 weeks I'd say.
I'd say it was intentional, severe (maybe high) and then high looking at a guaranteed 3+ at the tribunal.
Pretty nasty stuff.
Our best player is probably looking at 4 weeks I'd say.
I'd say it was intentional, severe (maybe high) and then high looking at a guaranteed 3+ at the tribunal.
Can't tackle a bloke who hasn't got the ball knock his head off was his only optionI thought it was careless rather than intentional personally …everything looks worse when slowed down and replayed frame by frame
He should had attempted a tackle and he knows that
2-3 with a early guilty plea as his feet never left the ground which is what they had been big on for the last few years with high head bumps.
Is this the first time Stewart been to the tribunal ?.
David King the flog calling for a 6 week suspension.
Tigers supporters seem to have a short memory, Cotchin's bump on Dylan Shiel.