Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Great QuestionIf it’s not Ned Guy, who is responsible for the salary cap issues?
What offer did we make to Cameron?
You're off your ****ing chops mate.Phillips after his 2018 season was worth that salary - he’s now been replaced by Daicos. So now because he’s superfluous to our needs hr is suddenly a burden to our cap.
Langdon was worth every cent of $500k in 2018 - remember Swans wanted him.
Then he aggravated his knee injury in 2019, and all of a sudden he’s over paid.
If he was playing like 2018 no one would be questioning his contract.
Beams isn’t on the list - and I don’t recall outrage when he was recruited at $400k.
Cox - was he expensive after you watched him play in the 2018 PF?
Since then he’s had ankle and eye injuries. He is every bit a $500 player if he continues his late season form that everybody was lauding.
Guy didn’t sign Wells or Mayne.
So really you’ve really not made a case.
What I want to know is where is our multi-dimensional forward like going to come from? Sure we can draft for it, but I doubt it would impact our style next year.
If it ain't Gunston I'd like to see us linked to someone soon...
Didn't he sign an extension after his first yearThis is what I don’t get. Stevo won’t even be on much because it is only his third season. I can literally see no point in trading him, there are no benefits.
Can you please explain how we have cap issues - with all our delisting and retirements and additionally managed to make an offer to Cameron?
Well said$500-600k was potentially the market price for another club to lure him over. As a general rule, if a player is happy at their current club then they’ll re-sign at a lower rate than what they’d get on the open market, because if every player signs at market rate the cap will bust pretty quickly. Player managers know this and will always advise their players that they’re unlikely to get a max value deal without moving. JDG stayed for less. Grundy stayed for less than rival offers. If we really did sign Phillips to a deal of that size, that early, then it was completely negligent. Not only did we pay the open market value, but we hamstrung ourselves at the end of 2019 when Geelong wanted Phillips and were probably willing to give a first rounder for him. Instead we were forced to honour his OTT contract and here we are, travelling our merry way down sh*t creek.
If it’s not Ned Guy, who is responsible for the salary cap issues?
I honestly can’t remember but I think he did. Still though he wouldn’t be on much coin at all, he is not our cap problem.Didn't he sign an extension after his first year
There will be no reply, there never is.I look forward to Spinners reply here, the same bloke that asks for evidence...
You reckon we might get an official document copied into the chat with the terms stated?
No point anymore. We've knocked back Hogan, Brown, TMac, McCarthy, Jezza chose the Cats, Gunston ain't going anywhere. JJK and Dixon knocked us back.
Seems like 2 metre Peter ain't our cup of tea either and is Essendon bound.
I'm guessing Bucks is getting told to run it back with the same crew, probably minus Stepho and Ads, and just hope we luck it out with injuries which hasn't happened with us for a millennium.
If Treloar is out I think this will be about what we will get, not sure who the suitors are yet though. We won’t be getting a top 4 pick and pick 5 from GC is seeming unlikely. Unless whatever pick we get we package it up with pick 14 and try to move into the top 5 I’d be really against letting Treloar go.
Salaries are only dictated by the market to a certain extent. If a club is unable to sign their players below market rate, (which is typically overs because that’s what it takes to lure a player away from their club unless they’re unhappy there) then they should trade them out. This is the stance pretty much every competent list manager in the AFL has, hence why you see players signing on for less than market rates at their current clubs all the time.Ok - so my point on salaries is that they are dictated not by the club, but the market.
We will be fortunate to get JDG at a good rate because his issues and exposed form has caused him to be devalued by the market.
Phillips we agree was paid at market rates - in hindsight I agree we should have traded him to Geel.
But we are fortunate, to only be having this debate on Phillips, because Daicos has progressed far quicker than anyone expected.
Of all the forwards you listed, pretty much Cameron is the only one who maybe matched what Bucks was seemingly getting at. I took him to be wanting a Gunston type. That tall-ish forward that could still win a ground ball or chase/lay a tackle.
I don't care if we do nothing at the trade table with regards to our mids/backs, or even lose Treloar without an immediate replacement, provided that we do something to the forward line.
I agree.You're off you ******* chops mate.
So you believe that there is no salary cap pressure forcing us to move Adam on? That this whole situation is an exercise in either aggressive trading or compassion? If so, the narrative has absolutely tanked the trade value of a contracted, walk up best 22, borderline elite midfielder.
Eddie?? You're talking about OUR Eddie????He went out of his way to clip a rival club on that one, he’s allowed to handle controversial issues but maintain some tact and be political.
Can you please explain to us how life works?If the club had a crystal ball it never would have signed Beams, re-signed Langdon or Phillips.
But that’s not how life works - nor is it therefore the basis to bag Ned Guy, for events beyond his control.
If it’s not Ned Guy, who is responsible for the salary cap issues?