List Mgmt. Trade/Draft/Targets Part II

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Yes. I’d be filthy if I were those clubs and didn’t rate it when we did it at the time.
So all academy players and father/sons should be off limits even the clubs rate them as the best player at their picks? We should deliberately compromise drafts further by allowing clubs to not pay fair value?

I think some people like being outraged for the sake of being outraged. St Kilda did nothing wrong bidding on Naish as that was exactly where he was rated within the draft range.
 
Bit harsh on Butler.
He has no future at RFC.
The club is just trying to ensure his welfare and that he furthers his career elsewhere.
St Kilda has nothing to offer us practically in exchange but we clear a space on our list.
Couldn't stand if he went to Carlton.
He is a premiership player and that's all I care about.
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Papley will be traded for pick 9 and Butler for pick 70. Try get your head around that people. Lol.

Carlton keep making blunders.

Pick 9 for Papley is laughable.
 
I'm not sure.
We need to be careful.
Ellis and Menadue play half back flanker type roles.
Could not afford to lose KMac, similar role.
That would be three gone, one too many.

do you know how to reply to peoples posts directly campaigner :)
 
Posted it this morning and I'll post it again.

Butler & 24 to Saints
Stevens and 19 to Cats
17 to Richmond

Reports are we're giving Butler up for nothing then at least make it worthwhile and get something of actual value out of it, even if it's only moving up 2 spots in the first round

Butler and 24 to Saints, Steven to Richmond is better.

Edit. Oh 24 is not our pick.

Not sure if I'd use our first.
 
Papley will be traded for pick 9 and Butler for pick 70. Try get your head around that people. Lol.
Papley ain't worth 9 and Butler is worth more than 70, but Papley is the better player.

Butler, Ellis and Menadue are all expendable.
Next year they can reassess Markov's future, he could play at another club, no great loss.
Didn't see too much VFL this year but Aarts was impressive.
Aarts was nowhere near as impressive as the younger Menadue, who is not just a back flanker. Can play wing, and excelled in the last 8 weeks as a high half-forward, averaging 19 touches and 1.6 goals in essentially a Castagna/Lambert role.
 
Papley will be traded for pick 9 and Butler for pick 70. Try get your head around that people. Lol.

But hey they have a 'long list of demands' and apparently we 'understand' this (whatever the hell that means?). If anything we're being tightasses only giving them Butler and not throwing in some of our late picks. Seriously what's the point of being the nice guys of the AFL if we can't help the poor bastards! 🤪
 
Papley ain't worth 9 and Butler is worth more than 70, but Papley is the better player.


Aarts was nowhere near as impressive as the younger Menadue, who is not just a back flanker. Can play wing, and excelled in the last 8 weeks as a high half-forward, averaging 19 touches and 1.6 goals in essentially a Castagna/Lambert role.

Menadue is clearly not up to the level. Some decent back end VFL games doesn't change that.

One of the most expendable on the list. If he can yield a pick, even better. On Aarts, he should have never been drafted.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Trade/Draft/Targets Part II

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top