List Mgmt. Trade & F/A - 2017/2018 - Refreshed (cont in part 2)

[Bad Horse]

I'm reporting you... this has become verbal battery

Thats a serious charge.

 

[Chrispiesssss]

At moments like these, I wish clubs were more aggressive; for example I would have a chat with Todd Marshall. We don't necessarily need to trade for him, but just let him know that his spot within port isn't guranteed for the next 2-3 years and he's welcome at the pies. He wouldn't fit in the team with Westhoff, Dixon and Watts. It gives him something to think about next year when he's out of contract.

 

[sr36]

Must be a very shallow draft

I think it's become pretty clear that the review has suggested that moving on a third of your list every year isn't a good thing to do.

 

[sr36]

At moments like these, I wish clubs were more aggressive; for example I would have a chat with Todd Marshall. We don't necessarily need to trade for him, but just let him know that his spot within port isn't guranteed for the next 2-3 years and he's welcome at the pies. He wouldn't fit in the team with Westhoff, Dixon and Watts. It gives him something to think about next year when he's out of contract.

I suspect that a fair bit of that does go on.

 

[jdpie]

Comes a lot closer if all three of Sinclair, Ramsay and Smith are delisted. Plus there's always the option of delisting a contracted player and potentially rookie listing them. Oxley could be a candidate there.

Oxley will be delisted and re rookied

 

[mike123]

Watts will be an important unit of Power

Might be, he's no sure thing but it makes sense to make Dixon's foil a mobile player so I can see the logic in getting him.

 

[well left]

If Schache went to the Dogs, would it be worth having a chat to Redpath as a cheaper option?


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Tarkyn_24]

The same number we give for Mayne and Wells. Applying the Kappa logic we nailed those deals.

Unfortunately there's two elements to picking up a player and you've ignored one of them.

That’s not true, we lost Brown for Mayne and Wells.

We’re definitely losers even without considering FA picks.

 

[swoop42]

I can only assume our TPP must be pretty stuffed given how quiet we've been.

Yeah okay keep pick 6 but how about trades involving next years 2nd round or looking to upgrade pick 38?

I'd love to know if we've floated any players in seeking a way to gain a pick inside the 2nd round and been knocked back.

I'm not convinced Hine is the most inventive thinker around when it comes to more complex trade scenarios.

 

[nahnah]

I think it's become pretty clear that the review has suggested that moving on a third of your list every year isn't a good thing to do.

True but we haven't moved on enough players as it stands, so we kinda have to

 

[swoop42]

So looks like we have Forced the Swans to Upgrade Murray and then we are trying to work out a Deal. Though Harley made it sound it's NO Guarantee that would Happen

http://www.collingwoodfc.com.au/video/2017-10-17/two-resign-as-pies-and-swans-speak

Oh ffs.

We traded Marley for pick 105.

Just get it done Swans.

 

[sr36]

True but we haven't moved on enough players as it stands, so we kinda have to

Yeah. Sinclair, Ramsay, Blair prospects aren't looking great. Might still see someone like Aish traded out?

 

[Obese Arachnid]

I suspect that a fair bit of that does go on.

But why haven't they told us punters about it.

Then I can say something like, well we did give Mayne a four year contract at $2M, so why not get him.

 

[Thefly38]

At moments like these, I wish clubs were more aggressive; for example I would have a chat with Todd Marshall. We don't necessarily need to trade for him, but just let him know that his spot within port isn't guranteed for the next 2-3 years and he's welcome at the pies. He wouldn't fit in the team with Westhoff, Dixon and Watts. It gives him something to think about next year when he's out of contract.

Would 100% rather Schache. 1000%

 

[didaksrightfoot]

I can only assume our TPP must be pretty stuffed given how quiet we've been.

Yeah okay keep pick 6 but how about trades involving next years 2nd round or looking to upgrade pick 38?

I'd love to know if we've floated any players in seeking a way to gain a pick inside the 2nd round and been knocked back.

I'm not convinced Hine is the most inventive thinker around when it comes to more complex trade scenarios.

Or - we are sticking to 95% TPP, adjusting forward some contracts, and saving for next year when some elite FA's could be available.

We spent the last couple of years bringing players in (both young and old). Right now the club may well be thinking that it will only chase someone if they make a clear, medium-to-long term improvement to our 22, and/or if they come at the right price, otherwise we just go to the draft and focus on developing our squad from within, whilst planning on potential FA's a year from now.

In reality without transparency of contracts we don't have any accurate idea of where we are (other than b/w 95-105% of TPP's, same as every other club). I don't think us being quiet this trade periods gives you much insight on our cap position - especially when some of us actually think doing nothing is the best thing we couldve done. (Outside of getting someone elite, or for significant unders)

 

[ClaytonM]

Oh ffs.

We traded Marley for pick 105.

Just get it done Swans.

Yes but we didn’t want Marley, Swans at least are saying they want to keep their player.

 

[Obese Arachnid]

Or - we are sticking to 95% TPP, adjusting forward some contracts, and saving for next year when some elite FA's could be available.

We spent the last couple of years bringing players in (both young and old). Right now the club may well be thinking that it will only chase someone if they make a clear, medium-to-long term improvement to our 22, and/or if they come at the right price, otherwise we just go to the draft and focus on developing our squad from within, whilst planning on potential FA's a year from now.

In reality without transparency of contracts we don't have any accurate idea of where we are (other than b/w 95-105% of TPP's, same as every other club). I don't think us being quiet this trade periods gives you much insight on our cap position - especially when some of us actually think doing nothing is the best thing we couldve done. (Outside of getting someone elite, or for significant unders)

But but there was a slide......

 

[danielnajdek]

I'm dry retching at the thought of Crameri in a Pies jumper. Please don't do it Pies.

 

[swoop42]

Yes but we didn’t want Marley, Swans at least are saying they want to keep their player.

Yes but unlike Marley he's not played a single AFL game and his worth at the elite level is still unknown.

He's not worth anything more than a 4th round pick.

 

[Old Spice]

 

[Ricky90]

God, that's very accurate. Always feels like Barrett is pushing out a nugget every third word he speaks.

 

[Chrispiesssss]

I suspect that a fair bit of that does go on.

You reckon? I don't think so. When was the last time a contracted player left a club because he got pushed out by a club TRADING IN players that exact year?

 

[wicksy]

I can only assume our TPP must be pretty stuffed given how quiet we've been.

Yeah okay keep pick 6 but how about trades involving next years 2nd round or looking to upgrade pick 38?

I'd love to know if we've floated any players in seeking a way to gain a pick inside the 2nd round and been knocked back.

I'm not convinced Hine is the most inventive thinker around when it comes to more complex trade scenarios.

Hence why Ned Guy was hired to do it instead?

 

[Wooljay]

I'm dry retching at the thought of Crameri in a Pies jumper. Please don't do it Pies.

Where's that coming from?

Already have enough list cloggers, kill me now.

 

[TradeDraft]

Pick 31 is a Steal for Watts.

I would happily would of Traded pick 36 for Watts