List Mgmt. Trade & Free Agency - Fred 11

[_RT_]

Updated Picks As Of October 15th

 

[Morro]

they want Laylor and are trying to make us use pick 1 on FOS, their sneaky fockers them bluebaggers

This better not be the Franklin / Tambo saga all over again.

 

[Willo_23]

This better not be the Franklin / Tambo saga all over again.

God damn it I did not need that etched back in to my head you campaigner

 

[tigersnag]

How fooking stupid would you have to be to say over and over that WC should have walked Baker to the PSD when the player wouldn't agree to that, and Richmond has pick 1 in PSD.
You'd have to be a seriously dumb carnt.

 

[Sol23]

Why the **** would WC do that. **** I hate carlton so much.!!!

 

[verypoorboy]

Houston to Pies!

 

[Roksman]

 

[Roksman]

Houston to Pies!

Wrong thread mate.... nice lurking though.

 

[Rocco sifreddi]

This better not be the Franklin / Tambo saga all over again.

I Remember when the solarium spindoctor Terry $wallet did a powerboard presentation
On Tambling , the campaigner was jizzing himself like we just landed the greatest player that ever lived.

 

[captain blood 17]

Houston to Pies!

you lost mate? One thing we know, he's another player in a long list which has rejected going to #lolNorf

 

[Morro]

Need Houston to the Pies to fall apart. Then Houston to then go eff this "I can't stand South Australia. I actually don't mind the idea of playing for a semi-professional club where the general public is allowed to walk their dog on our oval during training sessions"
and we do a deal for pick 2, they get 6, 14 and give one off to Port.

Get it done

too late

 

[prodigy]

Damn that came from the clouds.

 

[Roksman]

Need Houston to the Pies to fall apart. Then Houston to then go eff this "I can't stand South Australia. I actually don't mind the idea of playing for a semi-professional club where the general public is allowed to walk their dog on our oval during training sessions"
and we do a deal for pick 2, they get 6, 14 and give one off to Port.

Get it done

Haha.

 

[BKM78]

I don't think some people understand this draft pool. It lacks stars so getting pick 1 is probably little better than getting pick 5. What it does have though, is quality depth. The first 30 players are all quality so, this year, it is far better to have MORE early picks in the top 30 than have EARLY picks. Trading out picks would be a mistake in this draft - its why West Coast were willing to trade out pick 3

Didn’t Kevin Sheehan say this is a generational draft? Got to be some elite talent for him to say that surely?

Eagles supporters going well atmo

View attachment 2142255

Yeah na the glass bbq had nothing to do with it mate.

 

[Finn9]

Haha.

Nevermind

 

[Nostradumbass]

Houston to Pies!

 

[jthanos]

I am hearing #23 & #29 for Rioli now, AFL have intervened .........

 

[Lord of the Wings]

Why do GC care? Are they willing to put their own trade at risk?

They need to get rid of Lukocious $1.2mil salary next year before they can commit to Rioli

 

[Willo_23]

Wrong thread mate.... nice lurking though.

All roads lead to our board, I can't blame him

 

[captain blood 17]

I Remember when the solarium spindoctor Terry $wallet did a powerboard presentation
On Tambling , the campaigner was jizzing himself like we just landed the greatest player that ever lived.

Well that was 2003/4. How'd we go since?

 

[Meteoric Rise]

Sorry but I don't know what the point of looking at past drafts is when this draft seems to be historically deep?

Also looking at player taken only at those picks makes no sense. With those picks you have access to those players and every player taken afterwards. Realistically you should at least by looking at a list of the 5-10 players taken after that pick as guys that would be a chance to be selected.

The depth of any draft cannot be confidently predicted in advance. 2017 looked like not much of a draft until about 2022 the picture started to emerge with a lot more clarity. In that 2017 draft, which this draft has been compared to most often, picks 12 & 13 produced D Fogarty and Brander. You are not swapping Bolton for them.

Looking at the players taken at those picks imo makes perfect sense. The clubs holding those picks were in the same position we are likely to be in. We don't get to select who turns out the best of what is available with our picks. We get to select who we think will be the best of the remaining players with our picks. Precisely what all those clubs did.

We can see the picks are potentially very valuable. But we can also see they don't automatically hold a higher value than Bolton.

Whatever is the case, the picks will likely entitle us to take 12th and 13th highest rated prospects in this draft. My list shows what that has actually produced in previous drafts. Not what it might have produced had the team taking the pick got a mulligan and got to pick one of the next 5 if they got it wrong the first time.

 

[prodigy]

Hopefully 23 isn't involved

 

[verypoorboy]

Wrong thread mate.... nice lurking though.

Haha keeping tabs on everyone

 

[M0557]

Damn that came from the clouds.

who broke Embargo.....

 

[Willo_23]

AHAHAHAHAHA suck it Kornes

 

[Frustrated Tiger]

I am hearing #23 & #29 for Rioli now, AFL have intervened .........

In that case, he'll be staying in Yellow and Black