List Mgmt. Trade Period 2016 - The Live Freo Thread

[Lach72]

In: Pick 7, pick 35, pick 40, pick 71, B.Hill, McCarthy, Hamling, Kersten, Gold Coast future 4th rounder
Out: pick 3, pick 43, pick 61, Mayne, future 2nd rounder.

Good lord.

When you look at it like that (all together) we've made out like bandits

 

[wayToGo_]

Good lord.

When you look at it like that (all together) we've made out like bandits

But but but what about West Coast?

 

[Lach72]

https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/sport/afl/a/32958684/afl-trade-period-your-clubs-performance-rated/

West Coast: Weren’t big players, but what they did was quality. Getting Sam Mitchell for pick No.88 was the best deal done of this trade period and bringing in Vardy addressed a clear shortage in the ruck. Some fans may be frustrated that West Coast were not more active, but it looks a trade period of well reasoned thinking. A

View attachment 303099

FMD.

"West Coast traded for old man on Zimmer frame and vaguely tall invalid permanently attached to drip after surgery"
F-

 

[Purpellian Anchor]

A pick between #54 and #72, not so bad.

with about next years pick 40 based on points and a whole lot of calculations ....... a good deal

 

[Purpellian Anchor]

crap my typing is pathetic worth about.....

 

[Nickos66]

"West Coast traded for effectively an assistant coach and vaguely tall invalid permanently attached to drip after surgery"
F-

Updated.

 

[TheLastCall]

35 & 71 for 73 and our 2nd next year

hmmm, we must have someone in mind.

We also got a future 4th from GC as part of the deal.

 

[FreoRicci]

Would be happy if we went after Black with a pick 96 anyway.. Nothing to lose but guess he would've want to go to Geelong and play 10+ games for them instead/

 

[DaveLister]

Anyone know how many open list spots GWS have? Noting their max and min list size is now in line with the rest of the competition and they can only bring as many picks to the draft as they have open spots. I can see 71 moving significantly forward Just on the back of GWS having 11 picks before it,

 

[Taylor]

..and get paid $400,000 for the pleasure.

I wonder how their fans feel about Bartel being booted for Black.

Obviously that isn't how it went down, just looking at the result.

 

[Nickos66]

Anyone know how many open list spots GWS have? Noting their max and min list size is now in line with the rest of the competition and they can only bring as many picks to the draft as they have open spots. I can see 71 moving significantly forward Just on the back of GWS having 11 picks before it,

Not that many spots - Points, points, POINTS!

Yep, our 71 will be much better than it currently looks.

 

[Taylor]

GWS lost ten senior listed players I believe.

 

[Freo Dr]

Final standing:
11 players out (7 senior list: Pavlich, de Boer, C. Pearce, Mayne, Hannath, Grey, Mzungu) (4 rookie list: Deluca, Smith, Morabito, Hurley {3b})
4 players in (4 senior list: McCarthy, B. Hill, Hamling, Kersten)

Empty slots: 3 senior list, 3 rookies (plus any category B rookies if we go down that path again).

This is assuming we stick with the 39/5 squad ratio. I'm also assuming that neither Nyhuis or Uebergang will be promoted.

National draft:

• Pick 7 (1st round)
• Pick 35 (2nd round)
• Pick 40 (2nd round)
• Pick 71 (4th round) *only if Silvagni delisted
• Pick 79 (5th round) *only if Barlow delisted

Rookie draft:

• Pick 3
• Pick 21 (Deluca?)
• Pick 39 (Gray?)

Good summary. With the GC trade we also upgraded that pick 73 to 71. Since we have no father/son/Academy players needing points it can only mean we are also after someone late in the draft otherwise there would be no point in swapping 4th rounders. That is bad news for Barlow or SNOS. Could be ruck backup for example.

Also by trading back into the 2nd round this year we get someone and get a year of development into them versus a 2nd round next year. Probably fits better with getting the list ready for another crack.

 

[DaveLister]

GWS lost ten senior listed players I believe.

but they were a few above 40 to start with. I'd ask the GWS board but I don't think they'd have a clue

 

[Admiral Byng]

*SA hat on*

Look, Hamling was delisted from Geelong and outside of a good finals series wouldn't be best 22 ahead of Adams. Kersten is a spud that wasnt best 22 and the fact Geelong brought in Black to replace him says it all. Hill is a soft front runner in a good team, and if we didn't get the MacCarthy over the line, Bondy and Lloyd should be shot. You idiots are happy with accepting mediocrity.

The guys we've brought in were fringe in their own teams, so pat yourselves on the back all you want - we're still in no better a position. We couldn't nab Hogan this trade period, which says a lot about the club and our inability to attract talent. And to cap it off we traded our first pick down 4 positions in the draft which will lose us the ability to get a top rated player for the first time since 2008. You pencil necks are a joke if you think these trades have made the club better.


*SA hat off*

even the Russian judge gave it 9.5

 

[jerms]

Best plane flight ever. Brad Lloyd, go and sink some well-earned tins.

 

[Nickos66]

GWS lost ten senior listed players I believe.

It's nuts, they have 12 picks under 77. That's 12 live picks before Hawthorn enters the draft at pick 88.

Hopefully they only use around 6-8 of them

 

[Paracleet]

It's nuts, they have 12 picks under 77. That's 12 live picks before Hawthorn enters the draft at pick 88.

Hopefully they only use around 6-8 of them

Be 8 taken absolute max, what with academy bids chewing up picks.

 

[Arcassius]

GWS lost ten senior listed players I believe.

Doesn't their list size shrink anyway? How many do they need to take?

 

[BigWardy12]

Doesn't their list size shrink anyway? How many do they need to take?

I think their list shrinks by 2. Plus they picked up Deledio. so if they lost 10 players they will have to use 7 picks. Unless there is anyone that isnt signed that they are delisting?

 

[Dockers Fan]

Can someone give me a hell yeah?

Hell yeah

 

[Purple Jesus]

START THE @#$!ING CAR

 

[Dockers Fan]

Personally, I wouldn't mind to see him back as a High HFF to see what he could do under Ross..


Yeah I don't think he'd be much happier here tbh. Still! He'll no doubt end up somewhere in the PSD, anyone know where he's from originally?

Melbourne

 

[Square Peg]

Good summary. With the GC trade we also upgraded that pick 73 to 71. Since we have no father/son/Academy players needing points it can only mean we are also after someone late in the draft otherwise there would be no point in swapping 4th rounders. That is bad news for Barlow or SNOS. Could be ruck backup for example.

Also by trading back into the 2nd round this year we get someone and get a year of development into them versus a 2nd round next year. Probably fits better with getting the list ready for another crack.

Not necessarily. Couldn't we keep them, take 4 in the draft and have 40 on the main list next year with 4 rookies?

 

[Arcassius]

Its interesting if you look at the draft picks they originally went for (generally 1st and second round picks) and order them that way. Regardless of what they are worth now, it gives you an idea of the way they were rated in their draft year.

In: Pick 7, McCarthy (14), Hamling (32), B.Hill (33), Kersten (34), pick 35, pick 40, pick 71, Gold Coast future 4th rounder
Out: pick 3, future 2nd rounder, Mayne, pick 43, pick 61