List Mgmt. Trade targets 2022

[Chachi]

CD just on.

Still in talks regarding Esava, 33 on the table. Talks are slow. Doesn't sound that positive.

No one else really in the frame. They'll take 33 to the draft.

 

[PatientMental]

Bit of an odd thing to refer to jackson as

 

[OneGreatClub]

 

[RussellEbertHandball]

If a trade doesn't get done today, the clubs are then embargoed from going to the AFL until 3pm tomorrow.

AFL trying to manufacture some hype after the Mega Deal haggling didn't go until Wednesday night.

 

[Ford Fairlane]

Lol future 3rd round pick.

 

[PortVic]

Wouldn't be surprised if we do some trades in these next 2 days to get some currency into next year's draft. Just incase a Pickett for example wants to come home.

So players like hayes/bonner might be on the move

Hard to start negotiating with teams this late, but I would be watching Hawthorn closely. After Meek, but not sure Freo will let both Meek & Lobb go. And if they trade both Mitchell & Omeara they will end up with atleast 4 picks inside our 33. Could we send Hayes & Drew both young enough to contribute to their rebuild & positions they need covered.

 

[Ford Fairlane]

 

[Grave Danger]

Lol future 3rd round pick.

Billy Frampton went for the same price today.

 

[RussellEbertHandball]

Lol future 3rd round pick.

The AFL stops a club who has responsibly traded for players and treated them well from an exception to use a F2 with an F1 as a oncer, because they don't want to set a precedent, yet lets a club they own and control, backend a Neville's contract so they have to pay him $850k next year and then dump him and give away a pick 7 with it to the premiers, Bowes has played 83 games in 6 seasons and never got a brownlow vote.

If its good enough for the AFL to say clubs are too stupid and cant be trusted with trading out future picks in excess of 1st round, and they are control freaks with the TPP and Soft Cap, then they should bring in a rule that clubs can't backend more than 25% of an original contract or take the original value over the term, work out the average per year, and that clubs can't pay more than 1.25 x that average figure in the last 2 years of the contract.

It will be a farce if a player receiving $850k is playing 15 to 20 VFL games next year. That would be the salary cap for maybe 3 VFL non aligned clubs.

 

[Jonts]

Is Dunkley as a PSD anything more than a fantasy?
It would be in the clubs best interest to be quiet about it to not force Brisbane into trading

Just wanting a confirmation like from zakk or AW or C4

 

[Gryllis]

That Bowes trade is an absolute farce. Asterisk up any Geelong flags.

*AFL allowed dodgy trades to Geelong during this period.

 

[Jello_B]

Can we get Graham for 33?
Sneaky chance of Dunkley getting to PSD?

 

[Coobk001]

Billy Frampton went for the same price today.

It's funny, how did the Crows turn a future 4th spud from us, into a future 3rd spud that Collingwood have.

Crows have done well in that deal.

 

[Coobk001]

Is Dunkley as a PSD anything more than a fantasy?
It would be in the clubs best interest to be quiet about it to not force Brisbane into trading

Just wanting a confirmation like from zakk or AW or C4

If he was there, you think we'd grab him, but WB will probably cave.

 

[Grave Danger]

It's funny, how did the Crows turn a future 4th spud from us, into a future 3rd spud that Collingwood have.

Crows have done well in that deal.

Organic growth.

 

[Ford Fairlane]

It's funny, how did the Crows turn a future 4th spud from us, into a future 3rd spud that Collingwood have.

Crows have done well in that deal.

Billy Frampton is like the modern Shaun McKernan - He's still on a list?

 

[RussellEbertHandball]

After the Big Bad Billy Trade:

19 players traded in 17 deals +
5 players walk via free agency
====
24 players have moved clubs +
3 pick swap only trades.

 

[Us against the rest]

Lol future 3rd round pick.

This has to be a joke right?

 

[PortVic]

Hard to start negotiating with teams this late, but I would be watching Hawthorn closely. After Meek, but not sure Freo will let both Meek & Lobb go. And if they trade both Mitchell & Omeara they will end up with atleast 4 picks inside our 33. Could we send Hayes & Drew both young enough to contribute to their rebuild & positions they need covered.

Probably could offer same 2 players to GWS if Soldo not part of the Hopper deal. Drew, Hayes, 33 for 19, 53 & future 3rd.

 

[Adz2332]

I know not many people will agree with me but im happy to keep Bonner.

Also Jack Redden

8

Jack Redden

Age

34

Ht

190cm

Wt

85kg

Pos.

Mid

Career

Season

Last 5

D

21.6

5star

K

11.0

4star

HB

10.6

5star

M

4.7

4star

T

5.7

5star

CL

3.9

5star

D

15.0

4star

K

7.3

3star

HB

7.8

4star

M

3.6

4star

T

2.3

3star

CL

1.5

4star

D

15.4

4star

K

7.8

3star

HB

7.6

5star

M

4.0

4star

T

4.8

5star

as a back up with Dumont wouldnt be the worst thing in the world

 

[Malibu#27]

I know not many people will agree with me but im happy to keep Bonner.

Also Jack Redden as a back up with Dumont wouldnt be the worst thing in the world

I have no concerns at all with him as a player, he should be on a list. He has the odd deficiency, but he is capable of playing good footy (further up the ground).
The only thing is, as always the balance with depth and opportunity... guys like this get squeezed out, sit in the SANFL and are then delisted and picked up for nothing as DFAs (unless they play for Geelong and are suddenly worth more than 33). If there was any reasonable interest I'd be trading him given he's 25 and still in contract.

 

[JakeNeadeFan]

The only role for Jack Redden

8

Jack Redden

Age

34

Ht

190cm

Wt

85kg

Pos.

Mid

Career

Season

Last 5

D

21.6

5star

K

11.0

4star

HB

10.6

5star

M

4.7

4star

T

5.7

5star

CL

3.9

5star

D

15.0

4star

K

7.3

3star

HB

7.8

4star

M

3.6

4star

T

2.3

3star

CL

1.5

4star

D

15.4

4star

K

7.8

3star

HB

7.6

5star

M

4.0

4star

T

4.8

5star

is the sanfl captain. We don't need 32 year old depth players on the AFL list. We already have one in Dumont who looked better this year than Redden anyway.

Happy to keep Bonner happy to lose him. We have cover for him but he's played ok football over the past year and we would get almost nothing for him in a trade

 

[Coobk001]

I know not many people will agree with me but im happy to keep Bonner.

Also Jack Redden as a back up with Dumont wouldnt be the worst thing in the world

Totally agree with you. Amon leaves a hole. A hole we think we can fill, but I'm totally happy to retain talent in that part of the ground that is proven and that still has more upside scope like Bonner, until we are positive that the candidates can step up.

 

[raptalia]

This has to be a joke right?

Sadly it is not joke and the AFL is a fn disgrace. The Draft and the Trade Period are supposed to even the competition up so how does this deal achieve that? If the #7 and the player were going to a cellar dweller you might argue that it will help the bottom club to improve it's list but it is not it is going to last season's Premiers.

The deal is not the joke it is the AFL that is the joke. As REH has posted, the AFL split hairs about us trading a future first and second in the same deal yet allow this travesty to occur.

You watch, the AFL will, in it's usual reactive fashion' amend the rules to prevent this sort of deal in the future.

 

[Adz2332]

I have no concerns at all with him as a player, he should be on a list. He has the odd deficiency, but he is capable of playing good footy (further up the ground).
The only thing is, as always the balance with depth and opportunity... guys like this get squeezed out, sit in the SANFL and are then delisted and picked up for nothing as DFAs (unless they play for Geelong and are suddenly worth more than 33). If there was any reasonable interest I'd be trading him given he's 25 and still in contract.

I just think we are short on Wingers now. Amon gone. Duursma needs to find his mojo. Bonner could be that winger to step in.
Bergman and Sinn havent shown enough as wingers yet