Schulzenfest
TheBrownDog
Weak. Even if the suspension was correct, what's the harm in trying when the vision is that unclear?
MRP / Trib. Tribunal Thread - rules and offences discombobulation
- Thread starter RussellEbertHandball
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Kochead doesn't want to annoy AFL House at this delicate time in his Commission Chairmanship tilt/fantasy.
Ford Fairlane
Moderator
- Feb 21, 2002
- 79,219
- 190,760
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Port Adelaide Magpies
- Moderator
- #2,928
The umpire reported him, Mitch was sunk on his evidence.
- Mar 10, 2014
- 9,521
- 11,151
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Man Utd, Celtic, Tanunda
We could play the "good bloke" card.
Worked for Charlie Cameron.
His parents are filthy rich, but in a flashy WA kind of way, not an old money Malbun kind of way, so no luck there.
As I posted in the Mitch G thread the umpire closest (20m ish) turns and runs away. He either had his back to it, or if it happened before he turned he didn’t see it because in the vision it’s clear he didn’t blow his whistle for the free.
Looking at the vision neither of the 2 closest umpires seemed to see it, neither seems to call the free as immediately one gestures play on referring to the play happening elsewhere and both turn their backs and run off.
From vision it appears the 3rd umpire in this pic (top right corner right side of fox logo near edge of frame) might have been the one. The incident happened around where I’ve drawn the arrow, you can tell by where they’re standing on the logo when they show the zoomed in potato cam vision. The umpire is positioned so he would have been looking at the dogs players back, and Mitch directly behind him.
There was also a mass of players around there.
Watching the vision roll there wasn’t any other umpire closer with a view.
It’s obvious Mitch has been flattened from behind, (umpires have not seen or whistled this) Mitch has gotten up and retaliated and an umpire has just saw the dogs players head go back and that’s what Mitch has been pinged for.
This was during a melee where 2 dogs players went ham on jhf while he was on the ground , clawed his face , and a 3rd dog came in on jhf while he was held down.
Looking at the vision neither of the 2 closest umpires seemed to see it, neither seems to call the free as immediately one gestures play on referring to the play happening elsewhere and both turn their backs and run off.
From vision it appears the 3rd umpire in this pic (top right corner right side of fox logo near edge of frame) might have been the one. The incident happened around where I’ve drawn the arrow, you can tell by where they’re standing on the logo when they show the zoomed in potato cam vision. The umpire is positioned so he would have been looking at the dogs players back, and Mitch directly behind him.
There was also a mass of players around there.
Watching the vision roll there wasn’t any other umpire closer with a view.
It’s obvious Mitch has been flattened from behind, (umpires have not seen or whistled this) Mitch has gotten up and retaliated and an umpire has just saw the dogs players head go back and that’s what Mitch has been pinged for.
This was during a melee where 2 dogs players went ham on jhf while he was on the ground , clawed his face , and a 3rd dog came in on jhf while he was held down.
I’m not sure why it is said the vision was unclear. I’ve seen Fox vision which clearly enough shows a swinging arm, the head go back and the player hold his face- the only unclear thing is whether it was a fist or the palm of the hand. Because it’s off the ball it is usually Intentional so he was always gone.
BZT lucky Heeney did the same thing.
BZT lucky Heeney did the same thing.
BZT got off because he didnt do anything. Naughton pulls his arm back, lets go then runs into the elbow.
Its not like BZT swings his arm back into Naughtons face.
Its not like BZT swings his arm back into Naughtons face.
Still nothing from the AFL from yesterday's games - they're probably still trying to find whatever way they can to save Heeney's Brownlow hopes. Meanwhile Rankine might be in for a NAIDOC Week sympathy discount...
www.nine.com.au
AFL rivals unite after revelations of 'abhorrent' abuse
'There is no place for racism of any kind'
www.nine.com.au
Janey
Premium Platinum
Veteran
Port Adelaide - Allir Allir Player Sponsor 2021
Port Adelaide - Kane Farrell Player Sponsor 2021
Port Adelaide - Connor Rozee Player Sponsor 2020
Port Adelaide - Zak Butters 2019 Player Sponsor
Port Adelaide - Jack Watts Player Sponsor 2018
Port Adelaide - Jesse Palmer Player Sponsor 2017
Port Adelaide - Riley Bonner Player Sponsor 2016
I love that the crows want to do everything they can to stamp out racism in football, meanwhile Tex…….Still nothing from the AFL from yesterday's games - they're probably still trying to find whatever way they can to save Heeney's Brownlow hopes. Meanwhile Rankine might be in for a NAIDOC Week sympathy discount...
AFL rivals unite after revelations of 'abhorrent' abuse
'There is no place for racism of any kind'
- Jul 1, 2014
- 7,578
- 8,401
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Chicago Bulls Man Utd
Lol ****ing games pathetic
- Apr 25, 2013
- 4,394
- 4,798
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Heeney one match. Rankine with four.
- Jul 1, 2017
- 3,268
- 5,338
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
He has a dot painting in his house which is seen in his last interview performed at his home. He loves the brothers.
chiwigi
I’ll make tears from your Wines.
I heard that Rankine has been racially abused online.
Has anyone check Walkers burner accounts?
Has anyone check Walkers burner accounts?
It's the Isaac and Izak show at the tribunal tonite folks. Did you know that Sir Isaac Isaacs was Australia's 9th Governor General? You do now.
He was in fact the first Australian born GG. He was also a member of Parliament, a High Court judge and sat for a while on the Privy Council.
Sounds like a right tosser.
Sounds like a right tosser.
- Apr 25, 2013
- 4,394
- 4,798
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Henry’s appeal unsuccessful- out next week and not eligible for Brownlow
RussellEbertHandball
Flick pass expert
- Thread starter
- #2,946
Sydney will take it to the Appeals Board.
Rankine's four weeks stands too. So there's that at least.
RussellEbertHandball
Flick pass expert
- Thread starter
- #2,949
They have to go to the Appeals Board first..
And Supreme Court isnt going to hear this before the weekend.. Its not a Grand Final.
RussellEbertHandball
Flick pass expert
- Thread starter
- #2,950
Rankine's case was another example of the MRO using his discretion, not sending it to the tribunal and giving a match penalty when a concussion has occured.
He gave him 4 games and the crows decided to appeal it.
That is either the 3rd or 4th occasion this year where he has used his discretion when the player hit, has been concussed, but has failed to explain why he used his discretion, and the media too dumb to follow up why.
I have listed the other cases in this thread. Its a subtle difference, but it should be explained why the MRO can or cant make a penalty ruling.
SPP's trial game bump on Keane, was sent straight to the tribunal. Why?? Beacuse the MRO didnt really know what penalty to give? or he wanted more than the 4 games?
The reasoning is never revealed.
Unaccountable swill continues.
He gave him 4 games and the crows decided to appeal it.
That is either the 3rd or 4th occasion this year where he has used his discretion when the player hit, has been concussed, but has failed to explain why he used his discretion, and the media too dumb to follow up why.
I have listed the other cases in this thread. Its a subtle difference, but it should be explained why the MRO can or cant make a penalty ruling.
SPP's trial game bump on Keane, was sent straight to the tribunal. Why?? Beacuse the MRO didnt really know what penalty to give? or he wanted more than the 4 games?
The reasoning is never revealed.
Unaccountable swill continues.
Similar threads
- Locked
