Autopsy US Election Day Thread - Trump 47th President of the United States

Who Wins?

  • Trump 270-280

    Votes: 35 18.9%
  • Harris 270-280

    Votes: 34 18.4%
  • Trump 290-300

    Votes: 22 11.9%
  • Harris 290-300

    Votes: 32 17.3%
  • Trump 300+

    Votes: 35 18.9%
  • Harris 300+

    Votes: 18 9.7%
  • Harris 280-290

    Votes: 3 1.6%
  • Trump 280-290

    Votes: 6 3.2%

  • Total voters
    185
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
The race is run, the winner declared!

For further discussion of the election:

For discussion of the incoming president:

For discussion of the losing candidate:

Enjoy, all!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Log in to remove this ad.

I reckon Beyonce not singing at her rally endorsing her cost her big time

If you can't even convince Beyonce to sing a ballad, what chance do you have on talking Putin into ending a war

Fair point, but don't you think trying to talk Putin into ending a war is a more noble objective than enabling him to freely expand his war?

Putin owns Trump. I don't know whether it's the millions in bribes, with the promise of millions more to come, or something as simple as threatening to release their pictures and videos of Trump's tiny dick (with or without the golden showers), but whatever it is, he bends over to Putin and I can't see that changing any time soon.
 
Buttigieg fits well there. But there's no way the seppos are voting for a gay man.
Satan will be ice skating to work before that happens, sadly. If you're not a rich white male of a certain persuasion, you're virtually no chance.
 
Vivek 2028 + 2032
Candace Owens 2036 + 2040
Barron Trump 2044 + 2048

Vivek or Vance in 4 years?

Or will it be based on the performance during that time?

Growth and positivity = Vance.
Stagnant or worse = Vivek.
 
Enough of calling out racism, apparently.
Please, don't pretend to care about racism when you've been received infractions for being racist previously. It's so hollow.
 
I guess they have now shown Americans won't accept a female president so I wonder if we see Walz make a run plus you have guys like Newsom who are constantly talked up for a presidential run.
For the US to get a female President, she'd have to be a Republican. Good luck getting a female nominee happening anytime soon there.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Never said that at all. Unless you deliberately ignore the small factor part. Even if it's just one part a small factor in the whole equation, it's still a factor. There is way more and bigger reasons to why she lost. But there is definitely some voters who would have voted against her because of the gender, or had it in a small part of their conversations.

If you spent any time on Twitter / X the last two months you'd have seen many commenting on her being incompetent because she is a woman and woman shouldn't be doing mens jobs.
Plus all the unhinged comments about her blowing guys blah blah.

America feels a long way behind other countries when it comes to women in politics.
 
Vivek or Vance in 4 years?

Or will it be based on the performance during that time?

Growth and positivity = Vance.
Stagnant or worse = Vivek.
I love Vivek - i'd be worried as a Republican that he may present some of the same issues that Kamala and Hillary undoubtedly faced. I'm a realist and there is no doubt, a small minority of Republican voters who may not get out and vote for Vivek. I'd personally back Vivek in.
 
Enough of what? Racism is not acceptable.
On that we both agree. I'm disgusted at what was said. That sort of thing is just not on, from anyone.
 
So strange! Everyone I knew in America said everywhere had Kamala Harris yard sings out the front everywhere and very few trump yard signs ….. seemed a Harris victory was inevitable
 
Plus all the unhinged comments about her blowing guys blah blah.

America feels a long way behind other countries when it comes to women in politics.
America is behind almost everyone.

Trump wouldn't stand a chance in here or Europe. Parties and politicians like Trump get flogged in our elections and normally only have one mouth piece with a seat, like that Babet flog. Thinking they are talking for the imaginary silent majority.
 
This is harsh. This is VERY harsh. I get the 'white folk are the best-positioned ethnicity to succeeed in the United States' viewpoint but to call anyone mired in, often generational, poverty a "failure as a person" is wrong in my opinion.

Speaking as an avowed left-winger these are the people who are meant to be our base. The right wing wins them over by speaking to their insecurities (why can't you get a job? IMMIGRATION!) and people without hope will look to anything.

We lefties need to achieve concrete solutions to help these people. To win them back in a post-manufacturing and service-based environment.
A lot of white people over there just don't have access to the things needed to allow them to the succeed in particular those in less well off environments. They can't afford to get an education and so on.

That creates the poverty and has ultimately created an environ where they have been ignored and the chickens have come home to roost so to speak.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top