Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
*fixed*ahh TheBrownDog, Brisbane's answer to celtic_pride and parrot.
Good and bad calls there.Nothing to do with Murphy's height. 179cm is plenty tall enough for a rover like Murphy. Schammer was an exceptional junior, very much as accomplished as Murphy. Angus Monfries if you prefer, similar players and no way Monfries was going at 1.
This is the crux of the matter. The fact that people in this thread still fail to understand it makes me realise that they don't WANT to understand it. Especially as it would expose the glaring contradictions in some of their "logic".
Splendini;16776294 I wouldn't be happy if we added a group of 28-something B-graders in the off-season[/quote said:At Carlton I don't think you'd even notice.
Sure you would.
Move on zee.
I was talking about the B graders.
you misunderstood mate, meant that you're our enforcer of sorts
At Carlton I don't think you'd even notice.
Jamison and Thornton will make easy work of fevola and brown.
Basically it's Fev and a pick downgrade...
Basically Fev cost you 2 first round pick players plus Bradshaw. Plus you traded away a heap of other picks for B-grade recycled's. It is indeed a gamble. Like the Lions, Freo went down the "top-up with retreads and traded away the future" path, and the results were disastrous. Same situation. Different result? No wonder Lions supporters are getting a bit edgy.
Y... who it's fair to say will be extremely lucky to reach the same heights as Fev. I'd sa....:
You're in denial over the Lions Retread Trading policy. Don't sweat it, you're not alone. 2 first round picks, plus Bradshaw plus a heap of other draft picks for B-grade recycled's was the cost. Vossy went recycle-mad in trade week, but he didn't address your list weaknesses - midfield and defense (see 2nd final). Lot of quick fix and panic about it. Lots of Freo about it. Vossy rolled the dice big time.
You're conveniently ignoring pick 27. As I said, it's a pick downgrade
Yes I'm in denial. In an extremely weak draft we...
I sure wish we had a starting forward-line as dangerous as Yarran, Setanta, Garlett, Houlihan, Betts and Henderson. Josh Kennedy would be nice right about now.
Conveniently left out Waite, Kreuzer, Robinson, Walker and Murphy. I wouldn't knock other teams forward line depth if I were you, after Brown and Fev yours in non existent. An injury to either of them and your season is over.
I agree the draft was very shallow - so it's extremely lucky that we got the Selwood/Swift of the draft in Callum Bartlett. Easily the talent of a top 10 pick.
I think we've uncovered a closet Richmond supporter. Bartlett hasn't proven anything yet, let alone that he's a steal or anything comparable to Selwood. Oh you mean because he was injured. Well that injury meant he was passed 26 times in the draft, this could quite possibly end up being as much of a short sighted decision as trading for a bunch of guys that couldn't get a game at the clubs they were with.
That was before the serious knee injury that caused him to be passed over 26 times in the draft. Don't talk him up while his future is still very uncertain. It's well known that he still wasn't even running at the time of the draft.Yes it could, but probably won't. Seriously have you watched his YouTube vids? Has superstar written all over him.
That was before the serious knee injury that caused him to be passed over 26 times in the draft. Don't talk him up while his future is still very uncertain. It's well known that he still wasn't even running at the time of the draft.
By the way, everyone's youtube clips make them look like superstars, they don't make highlights reels and put bad stuff on them.
It would appear that Carlton supporters believe that Lucas will be a great AFL player, and Henderson is a great developing KPP who is better than any of the KPPs available in the '09 draft, but Bartlett is 'unproven'.