manureid
Laziest Poster on Figbooty
Mmm yes.
20 years without a flag and we should be happy with it.
And continue without one for a while longer
Did we find silverfingers?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mmm yes.
20 years without a flag and we should be happy with it.
And continue without one for a while longer
Mmm yes.
20 years without a flag and we should be happy with it.
And continue without one for a while longer
Mmm yes.
20 years without a flag and we should be happy with it.
And continue without one for a while longer
Only after 18 years will we know if he is a good coach, 2 premierships or an average coach because the system is structured for equality and everyone wins one in 18 years if everything is average…Yep, 11 season amble opportunity Kenny being objectively inferior to the 10 other grand finalist coaches in the league is very reasonable.
Read the Creed, we acknowledge the is merit in defeat, but only after every human endeavour is exhausted…I'd fully support the reintroduction of capital punishment for these brain dead campaigners that continuously claim that Port supporters expect a premiership every year like it's the 80s/90s sanfl.
Nobody expects it you campaigner. They never have. If that's all you have in support of Hinkley - you have nothing
This picture is apparently from 2012, ie soon after the AFL planted Koch on us. WGT didn't look too convinced then, and I don't suppose that's changed much...
View attachment 1895780
Mmm yes.
20 years without a flag and we should be happy with it.
And continue without one for a while longer
Are you saying that the Club should block some members from being able to nominate for a member voted position on the Board?Irrespective of a former player's career on field, why would you want them on the Board when they were accused (and settled out of court) of defrauding a significant financial benefactor of the Club?
Ironically the Club at the time promised the Monteleone family Aber would have nothing to do with the Club in an official capacity ever again, only to go back on their word now because they are shitting themselves about the prospect of having someone in their ranks who will hold everyone to account.
When you're trying to re-establish trust and connection with the fans the last thing anyone should want is bringing in someone whose integrity and ethics led him to extremely questionable activity against people who have given their lives (both professional and personally) to the Club.
Is it a hospital board room or a sporting board room.I know I'm out of step with the majority on here but this is like Biden vs Trump for mine. They both suck
Loved Treddas as a player but his judgement needs to be seriously questioned. Holds some very dubious and poorly founded opinions (not Hinkley related) that pose a risk in a board room setting.
Then we have Abernathy who was part of the board that nearly saw the club fold.
Can we say no to both and start again?
Are any of warrens bad opinions in the field of football?I know I'm out of step with the majority on here but this is like Biden vs Trump for mine. They both suck
Loved Treddas as a player but his judgement needs to be seriously questioned. Holds some very dubious and poorly founded opinions (not Hinkley related) that pose a risk in a board room setting.
Then we have Abernathy who was part of the board that nearly saw the club fold and has his own dodgy history.
Can we say no to both and start again?
I know I'm out of step with the majority on here but this is like Biden vs Trump for mine. They both suck
Loved Treddas as a player but his judgement needs to be seriously questioned. Holds some very dubious and poorly founded opinions (not Hinkley related) that pose a risk in a board room setting.
Then we have Abernathy who was part of the board that nearly saw the club fold and has his own dodgy history.
Can we say no to both and start again?
1] Yes you damn-well are!1] I know I'm out of step with the majority on here but this is like Biden vs Trump for mine. They both suck
Loved Treddas as a player but his judgement needs to be seriously questioned. Holds some very dubious and poorly founded opinions (not Hinkley related) that pose a risk in a board room setting.
Then we have Abernathy who was part of the board that nearly saw the club fold and has his own dodgy history.
2] Can we say no to both and start again?
Not at all. I think that would set an extremely dangerous precedent and effectively mean that the members elected positions are members elected from the Club's approved list.Are you saying that the Club should block some members from being able to nominate for a member voted position on the Board?
What judgement are you referring to? Because he refused to take the vax? As more and more info comes out, his judgement was spot on.I know I'm out of step with the majority on here but this is like Biden vs Trump for mine. They both suck
Loved Treddas as a player but his judgement needs to be seriously questioned. Holds some very dubious and poorly founded opinions (not Hinkley related) that pose a risk in a board room setting.
Then we have Abernathy who was part of the board that nearly saw the club fold and has his own dodgy history.
Can we say no to both and start again?
Even if nothing comes out to validate his choice, in the end it is irrelevant. It was a personal choice he made, it wasnt as if he campaigned to have everyone reject the vaccine. A sackable offence? The irrational fervor surrounding this issue was next level.What judgement are you referring to? Because he refused to take the vax? As more and more info comes out, his judgement was spot on.
I cancelled my membership before 2023 due to Hinkley, so I am unable to vote.I know I'm out of step with the majority on here but this is like Biden vs Trump for mine. They both suck
Loved Treddas as a player but his judgement needs to be seriously questioned. Holds some very dubious and poorly founded opinions (not Hinkley related) that pose a risk in a board room setting.
Then we have Abernathy who was part of the board that nearly saw the club fold and has his own dodgy history.
Can we say no to both and start again?
5 minutes of scrolling his twitter likesWhat judgement are you referring to? Because he refused to take the vax? As more and more info comes out, his judgement was spot on.
What are his dubious views? I don't want to be forced to take some shitty vaccine that doesn't even work just because you demand me to.... even though it doesn't do shit and could even be possibly harmful? Is that the dubious view(s) you are reffering to? Anything else?I know I'm out of step with the majority on here but this is like Biden vs Trump for mine. They both suck
Loved Treddas as a player but his judgement needs to be seriously questioned. Holds some very dubious and poorly founded opinions (not Hinkley related) that pose a risk in a board room setting.
Then we have Abernathy who was part of the board that nearly saw the club fold and has his own dodgy history.
Can we say no to both and start again?
Abernathy is presenting his case well. The IJF thing will hurt him though.
In an ideal world we’d be pitching to get both on the board.
So mentioned Tredrea's non Vaccine stance but not Abers dodgy business dealings that got him booted from the board the first time? Unless I missed that somewhere in there?