Lambs brain good for footyThere's been a few comments about him having a good footy brain - bodes very well if true considering his size & athleticism.
I think he did what was asked of him on Friday night, so far so good!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lambs brain good for footyThere's been a few comments about him having a good footy brain - bodes very well if true considering his size & athleticism.
I think he did what was asked of him on Friday night, so far so good!
didnt we have a eagle kicked 5 or 8 goals on debut from subiaco ,, he was so good i cant remember his name ,, i think it was greek , Metropolis ?I wasn't on big footy back in 07, and trust me I want Lamb to be the best thing ever, but how did the board react after Brown's debut against the Swans? I'm all for optimism and excitement, although I'd probably consider myself a realist, but how about we judge players after a little more than 3 scratch matches of exposed form. Yes Lamb looks good, but he's played an Indig all stars team, a woeful Carlton and a PA side with an undermanned defence. I think I'll reserve my judgement until mid next season at least and then I'll pronounce him as the second coming he will be
Metropolis kicked 8.didnt we have a eagle kicked 5 or 8 goals on debut from subiaco ,, he was so good i cant remember his name ,, i think it was greek , Metropolis ?
I think he kicked 6.Metropolis kicked 8.
Funny how the one player who wasn't vanilla in our draft, was the one player everyone was crying about because we didn't get Blakely, and now low and behold he's Mr Sex and everyone is talking about how good he could be.
See what happens when the club decides to draft something other than a slow 180cm safe bet midfielder? I said as much on draft night, i was stoked we got Lamb, it made up for the devastation slightly on missing out on Laverde
Funny how the one player who wasn't vanilla in our draft, was the one player everyone was crying about because we didn't get Blakely, and now low and behold he's Mr Sex and everyone is talking about how good he could be.
See what happens when the club decides to draft something other than a slow 180cm safe bet midfielder? I said as much on draft night, i was stoked we got Lamb, it made up for the devastation slightly on missing out on Laverde
Funny how the one player who wasn't vanilla in our draft, was the one player everyone was crying about because we didn't get Blakely, and now low and behold he's Mr Sex and everyone is talking about how good he could be.
See what happens when the club decides to draft something other than a slow 180cm safe bet midfielder? I said as much on draft night, i was stoked we got Lamb, it made up for the devastation slightly on missing out on Laverde
Half the people that wanted Blakely would be crying after his quarter last week and even the patient ones would be complaining in 3 years time when we have too many "slower" inside mids.Funny how the one player who wasn't vanilla in our draft, was the one player everyone was crying about because we didn't get Blakely, and now low and behold he's Mr Sex and everyone is talking about how good he could be.
If Blakely was so flavoursome Freo would have taken him instead of Weller. The fact that he slipped through to their second pick means there were 30+ players rated higher than him by other clubs.If we had got Laverde, we would have taken Blakely with our second pick instead of Lamb.
If Blakely was so flavoursome Freo would have taken him instead of Weller. The fact that he slipped through to their second pick means there were 30+ players rated higher than him by other clubs.
If we had got Laverde, we would have taken Blakely with our second pick instead of Lamb.
Half the people that wanted Blakely would be crying after his quarter last week and even the patient ones would be complaining in 3 years time when we have too many "slower" inside mids.
I too was never super keen on Blakely (maybe for our third rounder but we took Nelson and so far he looks like an inspired pick), he was never really going to address our needs. Yes we needed mids, but another inside mid was definitely not what we needed when we had Waterman with our last selection. Have to agree with you that Lamb was speculative and he looks like just what we need. I read something the other day that said Richmond's problem was that their 2nd & 3rd round selections had failed, I think our problem is that our 2nd rounders were too safe and really hadn't lifted the overall rating of the team. Karpany was a small step away from safe and now Lamb is a real shift in strategy, I just hope this continues until we are a contender and hopefully past that too.Probably. I never wanted Blakely to be honest. We'd just got Waterman to go along with Sheed, still had no outside run and hadn't drafted to fix our lack of X factor and line breaking around the ball.
Lamb provides something different to everything else on our list. Just like Yeo did when he joined the team last year. 193cm wild forward that can be anything. Definitely a punt worth taking IMO. The first concern people raised was his softness, and he's got a tick for that so far going by his 2 nab games. Early days though.
I agree. Blakely was surplus since we have Sheed and Waterman. Plus, I like the Duggan and Lamb combination (as well as Nelson).Probably. I never wanted Blakely to be honest. We'd just got Waterman to go along with Sheed, still had no outside run and hadn't drafted to fix our lack of X factor and line breaking around the ball.
Lamb provides something different to everything else on our list. Just like Yeo did when he joined the team last year. 193cm wild forward that can be anything. Definitely a punt worth taking IMO. The first concern people raised was his softness, and he's got a tick for that so far going by his 2 nab games. Early days though.
Funny how the one player who wasn't vanilla in our draft, was the one player everyone was crying about because we didn't get Blakely, and now low and behold he's Mr Sex and everyone is talking about how good he could be.
See what happens when the club decides to draft something other than a slow 180cm safe bet midfielder? I said as much on draft night, i was stoked we got Lamb, it made up for the devastation slightly on missing out on Laverde
Surely you've lost this argument now.Very early days. Lamb has certainly put the right foot forward to begin with, but he's far from justifying selection over Blakely.
I still reckon Blakely has the better upside. Lamb has the physical and athletic capacity to impress from day one but there is of course a question mark over his midfield utility. Blakely on the other hand has the scope to become a high quality inside midfielder (IMO). His obstacle to overcome will be his footskills.
Lamb certainly seems a greater asset in 2015 but over the stretch it will be an interesting comparison.
I see it the opposite with Lamb having a far higher ceiling, 193cm 15 beepers with footy nouse and aggression aren't that common. I love the fact he's a hard trainer as well, these are the guys that lift the standard at training like Cuz used to do.Very early days. Lamb has certainly put the right foot forward to begin with, but he's far from justifying selection over Blakely.
I still reckon Blakely has the better upside. Lamb has the physical and athletic capacity to impress from day one but there is of course a question mark over his midfield utility. Blakely on the other hand has the scope to become a high quality inside midfielder (IMO). His obstacle to overcome will be his footskills.
Lamb certainly seems a greater asset in 2015 but over the stretch it will be an interesting comparison.
being an up and comer you probably wouldn't be overly enthused being compared to brown.Alternatively, Lamb could be the next Darling - not everything has to be about Mitch Brown.
and we turned him into a backman tooMetropolis kicked 8.