- Mar 20, 2007
- 29,812
- 27,909
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Did you mean to say Long instead of wide
Wow so Carlton should just show up then and we will get taught a lesson by our Victorian betters is it? You got a soft Essendon that tackled 67 times a pathetic effort. Here's a tip Murph and Yarran won't be having a laugh and a smirk running into our half back line like last week. You won at the MCG your own fans reckon is your true home ground and you beat a half fit piss weak excuse of a Freo team at Patterson we beat you at Etihad last time you played against soft opposition the week before. The only finals pressure you were under was the crowd, inside your coaches head and 15 minutes before Essendon turned into witches hats.
What do tall forwards have to do with the FACT that I replying to?
Read the full post
Betts - 89 marks
LeCras - 84 marks.
no one has said that.
But now that you bring it up....Kennedy is 194cm, Walker 190cm. Walker can jump higher and is quicker and harder to match up on. Kennedy has a great workrate, will be very good player over the next 8 years (but we always knew that).
That is not a fact.
Probably a lot more than you. Living in Perth you tend to get the Eagles shoved down your throat. I bet I have seen more Eagles games this year than you have seen Carlton games.....
Its odd that you mention that reliance on a small forward is not a receipe for finals success. Its quite another thing to have 3 key small-medium forwards in the leagues top 10 goalkickers. Its unprecedented. As such you can throw the cook book you are using out the window.
no the point has previously been made with particular emphasis about Stephen Milne and St Kilda. Not about small forwards in finals. And not really about finals, its been about big games.
Darren jarman, Brad Pearce, Darren Bewick, Jason Akermanis and others may also have a few words about small to medium forwards in finals. Yes we get it, you guys have a tall forward line.
And?
You are seriously arguing that he bulk of those players played in forward lines in which they were THE main players?
As I recall each of those players maybe with the exception of Jarman, played alongside quality KP forwards and their respective teams had a structure that involved key forwards and those players as crumbers playing a role ...
But hey, you feel free to ignore history to avoid the elephant in the room, your lack of a single quality KP forward....
FWIW, we have a weakness in the lack of a quality small forward to compliment our talls .... but its a weakness that is likely easier overcome ... I mean, lets say you guys end up struggling at times and are bringing the ball forward slowly and under pressure, whats your bail out option? I mean who is the tall target that can take a contested mark or threaten to do so in any meaningful way?
Fair enough if you can't see the most obvious structural weakness in your side (the other weakness being the number of hot/cold players but thats not structural) but most of the rest of us can ...
This weekends game is on your quality mids. They win it for you or you lose ...
50:50 in the middle won't get you there ...
Just because something has never been done before, doesnt mean it cant be done at all. 3 forwards in the leagues top 10 goal kickers over the season in the same team - let alone 3 SMALL forwards - has never been done before either.
Its not 50:50 in the middle, its more 60:40. Id take murphy and judd over any west coast midfielder any day of the week. I suspect most people would.
I'm not really sold on the Carlton play well at Subi theory
The played against a injury depleted Freo this year in the midst of a seven game losing streak
Last year they got beaten resonably easily by Freo in a final and struggled against West Coast (trailing at half time) when we crap.
And he has that crooked grin going on at the moment.
Just because something has never been done before, doesnt mean it cant be done at all. 3 forwards in the leagues top 10 goal kickers over the season in the same team - let alone 3 SMALL forwards - has never been done before either.
Its not 50:50 in the middle, its more 60:40. Id take murphy and judd over any west coast midfielder any day of the week. I suspect most people would.
Don't remember that final? I remember round 22 getting done by a goal as we limped into the 8.
Re: small v tall forwards.
Traditionally teams have required big key position targets. But rarely have these big guys kicked multiple goals in finals. More about the contest they provide and the ability of other forwards to feed off them. If O'Hailpin and Hampson can provide that ontest and bring the ball to ground, then the Blues are in great shape.
Reason eagles won so easily last time was the number of marks the eagles took in defensive 50. That won't happen this time with players to actually kick to.
I cant see this being anything other than a close game.
It has been confirmed that Gibbs and Kreuzer won't be making the trip West.
Confirmed by whom? Gibbs could still raise his arm above his head and move it, he didn't look in much pain. I think they'll give him and jab and he'll play.
CARLTON coach Brett Ratten says the Blues still don't know the cause of ruckman Matthew Kreuzer's foot injury.
Ratten this morning ruled Kreuzer out of Saturday night's semi-final against West Coast at Patersons Stadium.
He also said midfielder Bryce Gibbs was almost certain to miss with a shoulder injury he suffered in a goalsquare tumble during Sunday's thrashing of Essendon.
Ratten said Gibbs could play but was too big a risk because if he copped a knock to the shoulder the Blues would be left a player short.
It has been confirmed that Gibbs and Kreuzer won't be making the trip West.
No it hasn't.
Neither are likely to play. But I'd expect Gibbs to travel at least and to be given every opportunity to prove his fitness.
Kreuzer won't play this week at all I would think, so would probably travel to watch the game.
The bolded bit is largely true, however the issue remains that the KP forwards that provide the structure and provide the contest in genuinely good sides have typically been about 30 levels better than O'Hailpin and Hampson... they have been players one fears and plans around, players their teammates have faith in as bail out long kick options and players that could win the game if not clamped down on ... your big forward guys would need to play the game of their lives to be close to decent forwards ... its an issue and most Carlton people know it ...