dogwatch
Premium Platinum
Mostly agree with that. I wasn’t saying they were mutually exclusive, just that making extra bucks always has primacy. It doesn’t have to be that way but it is. The money men have control of the temple.Business and Footy aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. Ideally, it'd be a draw, not a fixture, but it isn't. We've benefitted in the past with assistance when needed, which can't be given unless revenue is maximised. As long as you insist on paying 22 year old footballers hundreds of thousands and AFL execs even more, then revenue has to have priority.
We insist on paying 22yos mega-shekels simply because the money is there from all the revenue-first activities of the AFL. The AFLPA and agents see the gold and understandably they want some of it. A lot of it in fact.
It’s a chicken or egg thing though. If the AFL chose not to be quite so mercenary but instead put the betterment of the sport and the competition first, there wouldn’t be quite so much lazy loot lying around for the players to covet.
None of this would mean we’d have to miss out on “assistance” (which for the most part is really hush money for copping the rough end of the fixturing).