whats the difference btween nathan buckley and god?...

[dancingdoggie17]

god dusn't think hes nathan buckley...

the only funny thing i could get out of the game...

 

[Dogs r Roos]

The difference is that Nathan Buckley isn't God but if you go and watch him play (as I did today against our doggies) you might begin to think that the umpires worship him and therefore he may be God - to them ONLY. You cannot touch God and you cannot touch Buckley, but if you do touch him then he will be given a free kick 90 % of the time.

 

[K9-54]

Can't say I noticed any assistance to Buckley's game from the umpires today. He was simply a good, but not dominant, player for them.

I'm up for a bit of Nathan bagging as much as the next person, but can't see much reason to bag him today.

 

[The_Flying_Egg]

Buckley was ordinary. Got a bit of the ball, but like usual didn't get his knees dirty at all

 

[Bulldogsroar]

buckley plyed one final , G-d none

 

[FIGJAM]

Originally posted by Dogs r Roos
You cannot touch God and you cannot touch Buckley, but if you do touch him then he will be given a free kick 90 % of the time.

Nice call:
Free kicks for Nathan Buckley = 1
Free kicks against Nathan Buckley = 1

Make no mistake, while you are all thinking that that weak sniping softc*ck Dimatinna did a good job, Buckley won us the game in the second half! Our third best player after Cloke and Rocca.

As for Buckley not getting his knees dirty Eggman, why would you want a midfielder with Buckley's poise on his feet to be your in and under man?? That and Nathan Buckley more than makes up for this by taking more contested marks that any other midfielder in the competition...bar none!!

You can all underrate him if it makes you feel more comfortable.

 

[-PC28-]

Originally posted by FIGJAM
Make no mistake, while you are all thinking that that weak sniping softc*ck Dimatinna did a good job, Buckley won us the game in the second half! Our third best player after Cloke and Rocca.

Can you please leave this Bulldog establishment before i make you

 

[dogboy23]

Originally posted by FIGJAM


Buckley won us the game in the second half!

Not far off there FIGJAM but its hard to say whether Dimma ran out of gas or Buckley just burnt him off in a champions effort.Thinking about it it is amazing how obvious it was that Bucks was going to unleash in the last term.He got 2 or 3 telling touches at the end of the 3rd and I thought "here we ****en go" shades of round 5 2000.

 

[Bulldog1954]

Originally posted by FIGJAM

Nice call:
Free kicks for Nathan Buckley = 1
Free kicks against Nathan Buckley = 1

Make no mistake, while you are all thinking that that weak sniping softc*ck Dimatinna did a good job, Buckley won us the game in the second half! Our third best player after Cloke and Rocca.

As for Buckley not getting his knees dirty Eggman, why would you want a midfielder with Buckley's poise on his feet to be your in and under man?? That and Nathan Buckley more than makes up for this by taking more contested marks that any other midfielder in the competition...bar none!!

You can all underrate him if it makes you feel more comfortable.

That sniping soft**** Dimma's report was completely dismissed you tool. And after Bucks effort last week don't call anyone else a soft****.
And yes Bucks, does have poise on his feet but the fact is he refuses to go in and get the ball no matter what. He cherry picks other guys hard work and the way he screams for the ball when in a worse position is pathetic. He is a great player because of his skills, but a guy like Voss is better as he is hard enough to get the ball and uses it sublimely.

P.S - Adam Simpson is better at contested marks as is Brett <ontgomery

 

[dogboy23]

Originally posted by Bulldog1954




P.S - Adam Simpson is better at contested marks as is Brett <ontgomery

B.Johnson

 

[Squeak]

Originally posted by The_Flying_Egg
Buckley was ordinary. Got a bit of the ball, but like usual didn't get his knees dirty at all

As opposed to Nathan Brown....

 

[TADS]

Buckley is god - If he wasn't engaged I'd be letting him park his shoes under my bed.



In my worst nightmare

 

[Jabso]

Originally posted by The_Flying_Egg
Buckley was ordinary. Got a bit of the ball, but like usual didn't get his knees dirty at all

As opposed to Scott West.
I think it was Dermott that said West is a great player, but only when he has the ball. Otherwise he is ordinary.

 

[Bulldog1954]

Originally posted by jabso

As opposed to Scott West.
I think it was Dermott that said West is a great player, but only when he has the ball. Otherwise he is ordinary.

Then not for the first time Brereton is talking trash. West is half the size of Buckley yet is twice as tough

 

[dogboy23]

Originally posted by jabso

I think it was Dermott that said West is a great player

Questioning Wests toughness is like questioning Buckleys kicking ability.I love when your not forced to mount a big argument because the other poster clearly shows a lack of intelligence and knowledge.