Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What are these betting odds to which you refer?Sportsbet Brownlow odds
$3.75 Patrick Cripps (Carlton)
$5.50 Nick Daicos (Collingwood)
$6 Lachie Neale (Brisbane)
$6 Marcus Bontempelli (Western Bulldogs)
$6 Zach Merrett (Essendon)
$15 Errol Gulden (Sydney)
$18 Caleb Serong (Fremantle)
I rate 3 out of the first 4 players as potential worthy winners - teh 'odds' are neither here nor there to me - all good fun though.
'Neither here nor there for you'?I rate 3 out of the first 4 players as potential worthy winners - teh 'odds' are neither here nor there to me - all good fun though.
leaving aside your comical and unfortunately inaccurate depiction of my schooling you - I have made it clear above that I'm totally indifferent to the posted table of odds regarding brownlow votes to date and silly dollar odd bet suggestions - ie to make it even clearer I could not care less about the betting odds - clearly you do take these gambling things seriously - which is fine as I have no issue with people being mug punters - like you are'Neither here nor there for you'?
You've been ridiculously brutal on the verge of hysterical when I've ever referenced them to indicate likelihood of events....
It's a different story when your Carlton brethren use them.
Interesting.
Oh, I knew who you were referring to.just as my aside added - for clarity I only rate 3 out of 4 of teh top 4 supposed 'favourites' as 'worthy' candidates ...you know who I wouldn't include - and just as a hint- their name ends with ."...cos"
leaving aside your comical and unfortunately inaccurate depiction of my schooling you - I have made it clear above that I'm totally indifferent to the posted table of odds regarding brownlow votes to date and silly dollar odd bet suggestions - ie to make it even clearer I could not care less about the betting odds - clearly you do take these gambling things seriously - which is fine as I have no issue with people being mug punters - like you are
as for people who post betting odds re the brownlow in this thread - clearly it is banter directed at your kidGOAT hypothesis - just as my aside added - for clarity I only rate 3 out of 4 of teh top 4 supposed 'favourites' as 'worthy' candidates ...you know who I wouldn't include - and just as a hint- their name ends with ."...cos"
cheers
JaB
I think you missed the point of the post you were replying to.Essendon, Pt Adelaide, Melbourne and Fremantle were all ahead of Carlton when we beat them, i don't know where you pulled this from.
Not really mate i realise he's referring to Sydney being the only side above us on the ladder.I think you missed the point of the post you were replying to.
The pain is real with this one.leaving aside your comical and unfortunately inaccurate depiction of my schooling you - I have made it clear above that I'm totally indifferent to the posted table of odds regarding brownlow votes to date and silly dollar odd bet suggestions - ie to make it even clearer I could not care less about the betting odds - clearly you do take these gambling things seriously - which is fine as I have no issue with people being mug punters - like you are
as for people who post betting odds re the brownlow in this thread - clearly it is banter directed at your kidGOAT hypothesis - just as my aside added - for clarity I only rate 3 out of 4 of teh top 4 supposed 'favourites' as 'worthy' candidates ...you know who I wouldn't include - and just as a hint- their name ends with ."...cos"
cheers
JaB
Collingwood has won 4 games and drawn 2 against sides above it on the ladder. Carlton has lost every game against sides above it on the ladder. The traditional AFL ladder is deceptive, in fact the higher a team sits, the less games against teams above them they tend to have played. E.g. Sydney hasn't even played any side above it yet and on the flip side, Richmond has only played sides above it.
We need a new ladder, and a new 'who will be better' thread, as the current versions of both have been proven compromised beyond any doubt.
Oh, I knew who you were referring to.
Tall Poppy Syndrome, jealousy and all that.
But he isn't a tall poppy so you can't apply that.Oh, I knew who you were referring to.
Tall Poppy Syndrome, jealousy and all that.
I’ll just leave this here …
You sold your future for Double Quarter Pounder King SchultzWe gave away a high first round draft pick, paid for multiple players to play for other teams and won a flag. you have multiple high draft picks and are struggling to win at the moment, seems like the jokes on you!
You sold your future for Double Quarter Pounder King Schultz![]()
Collingwood lucked into a flag on the back of father/son selections. Same as Geelong. Pies haven't been particularly good with draft selections outside of that quartet.We gave away a high first round draft pick, paid for multiple players to play for other teams and won a flag. you have multiple high draft picks and are struggling to win at the moment, seems like the jokes on you!
Owen 2 from your last two games.Let me get this straight…
‘We have multiple high draft picks & struggling to win at the moment’
Las time I checked the ladder, we are 2nd & Collingwood are 12th.
Who is the joke on now![]()