Science/Environment Wuhan Coronavirus (COVID-19) - Pandemic Declared - Part 2

COVIDSafe App - Will you download?

  • Yes - I already have

    Votes: 43 36.8%
  • Yes - I will in time

    Votes: 7 6.0%
  • No

    Votes: 67 57.3%

  • Total voters
    117

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is part 2 of this thread.

PART 3 IS HERE --- >
Go there for your Pangolin-rich experience /\
 
There definiately needs to be a balance stuck which is why they were reluctant to release the modelling.

At this point we need to think about why we are doing all these measures when there is a high likelyhood there won't be a vaccine.
Gladys says restrictions won't be relaxed until a vaccine is produced. Look forward to NSW being returned to a penal colony.
 
This is undoubtedly part of mine and others religious fervor quoting and listening to the very top professionals in the world.

i see no attempt from anyone to pull their logic apart ?.
No the top scientists are advising govts, you just keep quoting same random dozen from top link and from Off Guardian....aren’t they all conspiracists?
 
i see no attempt from anyone to pull their logic apart ?.
What logic?
e.g. from your links:

Italy is known for its enormous morbidity in respiratory problems, more than three times any other European country.
In the US about 40,000 people die in a regular flu season and so far 40-50 people have died of the coronavirus, most of them in a nursing home in Kirkland, Washington.

[…]

In every country, more people die from regular flu compared with those who die from the coronavirus.

Now the US Covid-19 morbidity rate is up to the 40,000 mark Dr Yass set and is accelerating. It's a few weeks old but that quote is already incorrect.

Italy has imposed a lockdown and has the opposite effect. They quickly reached their capacity limits, but did not slow down the virus spread within the lockdown.
It didn't slow the spread of the virus? This radiographer (an "expert" apparently) might want to re-check that.

etc etc

A grab-bag of desperately cobbled together 'experts' appearing on a conspiracy website (with nods to RT and Zerohedge, and their other articles cite noted quack Dr Shiva!) isn't much of a counter-point.

Now, as per my previous requests, where are the articles from doctors and nurses on the front line calling this an over-reaction?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Pathetic answer really, using your logic, we should cave the economy in a bad flu season.

Point me to the extra 165k in deaths on top of normal deaths ?.

Has ours or any other death rate spiraled above any year on year average ?.
Trump said 2.2mill would die without distancing and lockdowns. That was only a few weeks ago. You going against your saviour?
 
Serology testing.

We need it replicated all over the world though.
Exactly, and the fact that it hasn’t been means you cannot possibly extrapolate from one isolated example that the universal fatality rate is that.

The people that push this narrative know this too.
 
No the top scientists are advising govts, you just keep quoting same random dozen from top link and from Off Guardian....aren’t they all conspiracists?

LOL

You did come down in the last shower didn't you Barry ?.

You should be able to tear their arguments apart, but alas Barry you wont even try, because you are already sold.
 
Trump said 2.2mill would die without distancing and lockdowns. That was only a few weeks ago. You going against your saviour?

LOL, great political win then Barry - isnt it ?, wasn't he just repeating what the top medical officials told him who according to you all work for the Government ?.

Whatsmore Barry, i am more concerned with this country ATM, i know you like to score Political points any way you can though.
 
Gladys says restrictions won't be relaxed until a vaccine is produced. Look forward to NSW being returned to a penal colony.
No she didn’t.
 
Let’s not dismiss the serology testing.

The death rate really isn’t important at the moment though.


The diagnostics will be an ongoing process, it just needs tweaking.

Folks (not you, you're arguably the best poster in the thread) have an unrealistic understanding about how this typically evolves. FFS, we only identified the existence of this thing ~ 16-20 weeks ago, and then we needed to obtain significant initial symptomatic and diagnostic data in order to model the identification diagnostics in the first place, and this is a slippery sucker replication wise, as viruses go.

The CT's have typically jumped all over this aspect and dismissed it far too quickly in order to give a false reinforcement of their woo woo crap.
 
Let the people put their money where their mouth is - they can choose their own level of restrictions, but if they go beyond government guidelines they forfeit the right to treatment (should the need arise) for them or anyone in their immediate family they infect.
 
Let the people put their money where their mouth is - they can choose their own level of restrictions, but if they go beyond government guidelines they forfeit the right to treatment (should the need arise) for them or anyone in their immediate family they infect.

so I dont get treatment because my dad is an idiot?
 
Let the people put their money where their mouth is - they can choose their own level of restrictions, but if they go beyond government guidelines they forfeit the right to treatment (should the need arise) for them or anyone in their immediate family they infect.

A tad extreme.

We're talking about politicians here.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

They were debunked


All been debunked by moffy in a couple of lines and apparently they are all conspiracy theorists, although leading figures on the world stage in the field.

Whats Mofras field of expertise, -- big footy's leading debunker of professionals by the looks of it and conspiracy theory hunting.
 
I feel like I show Les more respect than most.

Stop ranting. Post some sources in favour of your position and hold me to my word.

Put some doubt in my mind. Most of us would love to be wrong about this.
BS - you are almost all of you heavily invested and some hopelessly.
When you are instigating unprecedent drastic measure, you would expect incontrovertible data by now.

The only conclusion to draw is that - whilst everyone may have meant well - they over cooked the assessment and ****ed up.
As I say, no problem with that - we can learn lessons from this - but we are now witnessing denial. The Doctors leading the charge have got a taste of fame and they aren't going to let it go in a hurry. All those experts who predicted armageddon don't want to risk being told they were wrong and being ridiculed. Senior Government figures are too scared to go against there advise and so we are in this twilight zone of indecision without direction.

Now that's my spooky Conspiracy Theory. It doesn't include a bio-war, it doesn't cast aspersions at William Virus Gates, G5 Towers, or some dystopian horror.
People simply over-reacted, thinking it was the right thing to do, they encouraged fear for our own good. They made the wrong call. It could have been the right call but not this time.

Right now our hospitals are empty, suicide, bankruptcy, depression, anxiety... and who knows whatever other crap is up up up.
 
All been debunked by moffy in a couple of lines and apparently they are all conspiracy theorists, although leading figures on the world stage in the field.

Whats Mofras field of expertise, -- big footy's leading debunker of professionals by the looks of it and conspiracy theory hunting.
Mofra always reminds me of the teacher pet's. I just can't work out who here he thinks is the Teacher - maybe Snake
 
Last edited:
Les Malone
yebiga
douglyzia
mouncey2franklin
Doug was different he wants to smash the Chinese for being irresponsible and ineffective in virus response; as opposed to the other 3 who see it as hoax
 
All been debunked by moffy in a couple of lines and apparently they are all conspiracy theorists, although leading figures on the world stage in the field.

Whats Mofras field of expertise, -- big footy's leading debunker of professionals by the looks of it and conspiracy theory hunting.
You asked someone to debunk it. I gave you a couple of examples, which you now ignore with snide comments. Why not address the point?

I think anyone reading a source should be skeptical and consider it's likelihood of being correct. The sources you provided are of low quality. I provided far more sources just a couple of pages ago, from a variety of sources, that counter the "just the flu" agenda.
 
I think those suggesting it won't matter if some die if we lift restrictions should be the first to volunteer to end it all

After all, it will be for the greater good, and I promise I will remember you and thank you each year on the anniversary of your sacrifice

Now get to it, Sam Newman wants to play Golf
 
Yep. And these guys too


Oh dear, the media is getting desperate for headlines now if they publishing articles related to 'what could of been' !!!

This suggests they are not too far away from flipping the narrative by questioning the ongoing restriction/lock-down measures which is 'destroying Aussie businesses and peoples livelihoods', is an 'abuse of human rights', 'defies basic civil liberties' because, 'locking up healthy people is a form of tyranny' etc. etc.
 
Doug was different he wants to smash the Chinese for being irresponsible and ineffective in virus response; as opposed to the other 3 who see it as hoax
Interesting you should bring that up, because the conflict with China is ratcheting up. Some of the language coming from a variety of US sources is as extreme as we have seen. It's sobering to consider how WW1 was triggered following a single assassination by an unknown Serbian separatist.
 
You asked someone to debunk it. I gave you a couple of examples, which you now ignore with snide comments. Why not address the point?

I think anyone reading a source should be skeptical and consider it's likelihood of being correct. The sources you provided are of low quality. I provided far more sources just a couple of pages ago, from a variety of sources, that counter the "just the flu" agenda.
Could you define what you would call a source of high quality? This should be interesting
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top