If Pedlar, Cook and Nankervis reach their peak, they might just be elite level.No, because these players becoming good won't give us the elite level talent necessary to win a premiership.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
If Pedlar, Cook and Nankervis reach their peak, they might just be elite level.No, because these players becoming good won't give us the elite level talent necessary to win a premiership.
Maybe better to say Frampton: was one finger man throughout...he did play okay though, but perhaps not his best game.Frampton: was one punch man throughout. As dour of a defensive performance that I've seen from Billy, but he looked good doing it.
If you combine the good traits of all three into one, then that would be an elite playerIf Pedlar, Cook and Nankervis reach their peak, they might just be elite level.
I've been a fan ever since his early Glenelg U18's games in his draft year and one of his school games the same year that was streamed...before injuries curtailed his season..Hey Mutineer - thoughts on Pedlar? I reckon his kicking will be fine when fully fit and more experience under his belt.
Pedlar's ability to hit the contest hard, and then butter up again is exhilarating .....gotta be played midfield to get maximum impactPedlar going to be an interesting one. He's a burst player. All explosiveness.
Means he's going to struggle at times, but what he does will be so incredibly exciting.
Pedlar going to be an interesting one. He's a burst player. All explosiveness.
Means he's going to struggle at times, but what he does will be so incredibly exciting.
I think that attitude extends to our coaching staff.Cook is a perfect example of how our fan base views any player that isnt an inside grunt with maximum effort, skills optional. Any time we bring someone along who has a slightly different game, which might be based on finesse rather than just charging into the contest fans start shouting at them that they're soft etc.
You can see why the club prioritises low skill plodders who crash in.
See, he looks like what should be grabbed at a MSDIzzy McKenzie. Freo were interested in him in 2018 but he was too injury prone.
Glad to see him playing well for us, and would gladly welcome him back at Centrals any time.
Read the Zac Taylor thread, looks a great pick upWhat’s the background of the young Johnny Platten in the No.19 guernsey?
can we send him to the US with Travis Boak in off season ?Pedlar's ability to hit the contest hard, and then butter up again is exhilarating .....gotta be played midfield to get maximum impact
2 issues 1 who is underneath that will come in?
2 who do you drop??
BSmith was inconsistent but who replaces him??
We are carrying a lot of young guys already in the team that aren’t ready yet. If we go all young, we will end up like Melbourne under Neeld. We do need experience on the pitch.
I like how Nicks is selecting the players, he’s dropped crouch and given young players a go. We already have the youngest team in the competition, don’t think 1 or 2 senior players playing average will destroy the team
at the moment .. he's as soft as anyone we have, softer than shollI don't think Cook is soft. He just need to show more urgency. A lot more.
Norwood stacked the defence and mercilessly scragged our forwards, aided by the umpires.Good win,
Lots of positives.
I thought our key forwards were pretty poor.
Gollant, Berg and McAsey had very little effect on the game
IF...I really don't see how Murphy and McHenry get many games next year if those players have a good run with injury.
I missed what you meant. There’s a lot of talent there but still plenty of flawsLol..... right.
Or...............he's been extremely overrated by lots. I've watched him enough, and my opinion and comment stands.
I agree with you BUT Nicks doesn’t, he definitely has a quota of senior players. Murphy’s not really that experienced. The choice isn’t them as such, it’s picking McHenry or those. You need to choice the right players to get games into.Why go in circles around this? I want more games into guys like Taylor, Pedlar, Cook etc and I don't particularly care whether they're 'ready'- we should do it anyway.
"Senior" players performing like Murphy, Smith, Matt Crouch did is not the difference between becoming "melbourne" (a club that still won a premiership sooner than we did with our fabled standards) or not. If you insist that they are, how? And don't give hackneyed indistinct answers like 'experience'.
The difficulty with the argument that there's a maximum cap on 'inexperienced' players is that those players are still inexperienced the next year, they havent played. And meanwhile you've got a whole nother group of inexperienced players to join them- your draftees. What do you do with all of these highly drafted players that it would never be ok to play?