List Mgmt. Trade & Free Agency talk Pt 5

[Heisenberg_]

We're not getting 8 unless we throw in another pick.

If we got 27 from Port for Graham

I'd package up 12 & 27 for Taranto 58 & 60 and 19 & 31 for Hopper & 40

Think it's a win/win for both clubs. GWS end up with 5 picks inside the first 30, Tigers get 2 best 22 starters and some picks with value that we can use to try and trade up given Brisbane will be looking for points

Yep, if Graham is traded what we get will almost certainly be heading GWS’ way.
Wish people would forget the pick 8 suggestions, it ain’t happening.

 

[Bojangles17]

100% Agree

When he becomes a free agent and out of contract , But for Now we want pick #8

We won’t get that ,,,~25 is about right

 

[GhostofJimJess]

* If the 2 teams are too far apart i dont believe an announcement will be made only for it to fall through leaving Graham in an embarrassing or awkward position

I'd like to think we've evolved a bit from this R2R. I reckon everyone at Tigerland, including JGTI, would move on pretty quickly if a possible move fell through.

 

[prodigy]

Naish delisted - stiff.

 

[_RT_]

Naish delisted - stiff.

[Mr.Magic]Should get him back as we're in our premiership window again.[/Mr.Magic]

 

[Tiger_4_Life]

Taranto and Hopper will easily find another 10-15% on their current capabilities when they're playing in front of more than 8k spectators.

 

[NZ_Tiger]

Was McAsey playing SANFL reserves? I’d be surprised if we took him, he looks like a complete bust.

Like that ruckman from the crows that weaver wanted instead of Cotchin.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Kegs]

Thought I would check the Adelaide board for any news on McAsey and first page I see someone comparing Baker to Castagna Would love to know what they think Graham is worth..

 

[Meteoric Rise]

[Mr.Magic]Should get him back as we're in our premiership window again.[/Mr.Magic]

And Naish would help Taranto to develop his kicking and outside game.

 

[_RT_]

 

[Meteoric Rise]

Was McAsey playing SANFL reserves? I’d be surprised if we took him, he looks like a complete bust.

Like that ruckman from the crows that weaver wanted instead of Cotchin.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There has clearly been something amiss with McAsey at Adelaide. Who knows if it could be corrected elsewhere, but if he wasn’t too pricey, he might be worth a punt if the cost is low. I watched him in his early games for Adelaide, in the COVID affected 2020 season. The Crows were incredibly weak then and he was a first year KPP, and got smashed of course. But I didn’t think he looked any worse than what you would expect of a first year kpp exposed to such difficulties. I think he has had some injury troubles but there is obviously something Nicks was not happy with for him not to get a run this year whilst Murray and Butts were conceding goals on a regular basis. Nicks clearly has zero tolerance of players not fitting the game plan. But you would have to wonder if Hardwick would be any more tolerant.

 

[prodigy]

This guy... so suss.

 

[Rioli2Rioli]

I'd like to think we've evolved a bit from this R2R. I reckon everyone at Tigerland, including JGTI, would move on pretty quickly if a possible move fell through.

Yes thats correct but no point in announcing anything unless its been nutted out

 

[THECHIEFTON]

Rekon he liked it because of the reporter.

 

[GhostofJimJess]

Yes thats correct but no point in announcing anything unless its been nutted out

Agree mate

 

[Old M8]

 

[Roksman]

This guy... so suss.

He does the podcast and VFL reporting, he would have no access to recruiting IP.

 

[TiggyTig]

You gotta love these delusional PA Nuffies that don’t think a pivotal midielder in 2 premiership campaigns would benefit them ,,,hello , you’re s**t , understated that and work from there of course he’d be a bloody bonus

Pivotal in all 3 campaigns. Sure only 2 time premiership player but lets be honest Jack could've played against GWS in 19 with no arms and we still would've won by 10 goals. They should've played him and just left him on the bench lol

 

[Morro]

Peanuts suggesting pick 8 for Graham are the single sole reason we have a. Bad name on BF. **** me. Pick 8

 

[TiggyTig]

You simply can't produce the positives.

Hopper is not a gun.

Taranto is a gun.

Too many of our players are not guns. We need guns,

Here is another newsflash. Bolton is not Dusty.

Bolton is a star, but he is not in the Dusty category and those pushing him in that category like in the media are reaching

Dusty wasn't the match winner he became at Boltons age you stupid campaigner

 

[DontArgue4]

Peanuts suggesting pick 8 for Graham are the single sole reason we have a. Bad name on BF. * me. Pick 8

Agree mate...

Its way unders

 

[fargothegreat]

View attachment 1522632
Interesting excerpt from Inside Trading today.
Port Adelaide might be open to shifting pick 8.
So, we could do pick 8 for Graham and 30?

I don't think Port would go for that, but I think there's an opportunity there to do some sort of three-way deal with GWS, where the Giants end up with 8 and Port with 12. Something like:

Richmond IN: Taranto, Hopper, Pick 60
Richmond OUT: Graham, Pick 12, Future First, Pick 31

Port IN: Graham, Pick 12
Port OUT: Pick 8, Future Third

GWS IN: Pick 8, Richmond Future First, Pick 31, Port Future Third
GWS OUT: Taranto, Hopper, Pick 60

 

[Morro]

Agree mate...

Its way unders

Exactly.

 

[Lacustrus]

Dusty wasn't the match winner he became at Boltons age you stupid cuunt

Not very civil

 

[TiggyTig]

Not very civil

Fixed it for you. Read his posts and tell me he isn't tho