Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Don't the train-on's get announced usually before Christmas?There's no hurry on that. The RD has only just finished 20 minutes ago.
Christmas is still 25 days away. There's another List Lodgement tomorrow. I suspect we need to wait until after that, before we can officially move players onto the Inactive or LTI lists.Don't the train-on's get announced usually before Christmas?
If train-on guys are choosing between us and another club, surely it'd make sense to provide some kind of clarity that there's actually a list spot available with us? Unless we're only looking at Turner for SSP
That's fair enoughChristmas is still 25 days away. There's another List Lodgement tomorrow. I suspect we need to wait until after that, before we can officially move players onto the Inactive or LTI lists.
I'd like to give you more details, but the words "Inactive List" and "Pre-Season Supplementary Period" don't appear in any AFL documents that I've discovered. They're not in the Collective Bargaining Agreement, and not in the AFL Rules document - and certainly not in the Laws of Australian Football, or Tribunal Guidelines documents either. There is simply no publicly available information about how these things work, or when players can be signed or placed on the lists.That's fair enough
FWIW by 'soon', I didn't mean immediately, just sometime in the next month or so when train on's begin to be announced
The latest versions of the various AFL Policy documents can be found here:
AFL Policies & Terms
Good luck finding anything referencing the Inactive List, PSSP, or even the MSD.
Crouch? No chance. No-one wants him.2023
My retirements: Seed, Sloane
Delistings: Murphy, McPherson, Borlase, Newchurch, Hately
1 year extensions: Walker, Mcasey (in a shock move) put on rookie list
Trade: Crouch finds a suitor and is traded for a late second round
Gives us 5 main list spots back
He looks a lot lot trimmer he might surprise youCrouch? No chance. No-one wants him.
Borlase and newchurch will not be delisted at the end of 2023.. it’s pure fantasy spun by the same people that told us all these two would be delisted this year and were proven to be talking shit.2023
My retirements: Seed, Sloane
Delistings: Murphy, McPherson, Borlase, Newchurch, Hately
1 year extensions: Walker, Mcasey (in a shock move) put on rookie list
Trade: Crouch finds a suitor and is traded for a late second round
Gives us 5 main list spots back
not everything is a rumour clam or inside knowledge - sometimes after having watched a lot of these guys play we can have an opinion on whether they can make it or should be cutBorlase and newchurch will not be delisted at the end of 2023.. it’s pure fantasy spun by the same people that told us all these two would be delisted this year and were proven to be talking s**t.
Under the current rules these two lads can be on the list as cat B’s for four years and will both be given that 4th year UNLESS the club has another cat b player or two available to draft end of next year that they rate higher than newchurch or Borlase and want to bring in.
“Trade: crouch finds a suitor and is traded for a late second round”
fcck me, where do you come up with this drivel?.. we‘ve tried for two off seasons now and failed… we can’t even give Matt crouch away.. and you reacon we’ll all of a sudden find a suitor next year and get a second for him?.. he’ll be a fxxkn delist.. why would anyone give us a second for him? especialy given its meant to be a strong draft..
the game no longer wants slow, accumulating crabs with zero hurt factor.
Actually... this might not be - according to THIS AFL article, it states:Borlase and newchurch ... Under the current rules these two lads can be on the list as cat B’s for four years and will both be given that 4th year ...
What’s the ideal number of mids on a List?What about Laird, Keays, Pedlar, Soligo, Berry, Schoenberg, Taylor, Nankervis, Cook, Rachelle and Rankine? Aren’t these guys planning for the departure of the 4 players you mentioned?
As Brown has retired, I don't think he'll be getting paid his full salary, maybe half, so let's say $300k (not a bad deal to play local footy!). Yes, he was probably told he wouldn't be playing AFL, but I assume a mutual agreement.
Therefore we $377k left of the $677k you mentioned above.
Plus, a team can pay from 95% ($12.863) and up to 105% ($14.217m) they've banked over the previous two years (I'd hope we are in this situation, or close to).
So shouldn't there be up to $1.354 wiggle room?
What’s the ideal number of rucks on a list?What’s the ideal number of mids on a List?
In the way of young potential mids and forwards/rotating mids we now have;not everything is a rumour clam or inside knowledge - sometimes after having watched a lot of these guys play we can have an opinion on whether they can make it or should be cut
i was gung ho on newchurch and borlase in 2021 but both went backwards this year. but again its just an opinion i see others questioning berry keays and schoenberg still - that i cannot get my head around.
What about Laird, Keays, Pedlar, Soligo, Berry, Schoenberg, Taylor, Nankervis, Cook, Rachelle and Rankine? Aren’t these guys planning for the departure of the 4 players you mentioned?
15? Where did you pluck that number from?You need around 15 midfielders on your list between AFL and developing in SANFL. Rachelle and Rankine are too valuable up forward to have as full time mids
Not super surprising we grabbed another two
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Borlase and newchurch will not be delisted at the end of 2023.. it’s pure fantasy spun by the same people that told us all these two would be delisted this year and were proven to be talking s**t.
Under the current rules these two lads can be on the list as cat B’s for four years and will both be given that 4th year UNLESS the club has another cat b player or two available to draft end of next year that they rate higher than newchurch or Borlase and want to bring in.
“Trade: crouch finds a suitor and is traded for a late second round”
fcck me, where do you come up with this drivel?.. we‘ve tried for two off seasons now and failed… we can’t even give Matt crouch away.. and you reacon we’ll all of a sudden find a suitor next year and get a second for him?.. he’ll be a fxxkn delist.. why would anyone give us a second for him? especialy given its meant to be a strong draft..
the game no longer wants slow, accumulating crabs with zero hurt factor.