Search results for query: *

The AFL have it in writing. Andrew Dillon mentioned it the other night. Take it up with them IanW. As I said, qualified google lawyers are hard to find so I'm sure they will appreciate your input.

The fact players are playing this weekend says otherwise. The AFL say otherwise. This isn't hard to work out - surely.:confused:

TB4 is a banned substance Ian. Not sure what your point is there. AOD is approved. No Essendon players given infractions so you need to take that point up with the ASADA lawyers, I'm sure they will be most impressed with your google degree. I'm not an Essendon player so I cannot answer on...

err what? When did he lie to the players?

Just because a person may have committed a fraud in one part of his life, does not mean everything else he says or does is a fraud or a lie. Now do you think you can walk away and understand that or is it still a bit tricky?

Same reason they made up the stuff about Essendon players being used in human trials for Calzada. They are currently getting sued for that one as well. Amongst a few others.

And here he is - like clockwork. The MENSA Dux of Big Footy. I present to you - Tiger71.

He probably has his own reasons. To be honest, given ASADA's completely underwhelming process so far why would you trust them with anything.

Incredibly there are now 24 pages full of foamers who actually believe this. No wonder fraud is still one of the most popular crimes when there are so many gullible people in the community.

He is well within his rights not to meet with ASADA. By not meeting with them, that does not render him guilty. There is still a presumption of innocence in this country. You cannot be forced to answer questions if you do not want to answer them. Do any of you foamers believe in due process...

To be honest, Dank has been shockingly slandered throughout all this by the various foamers in the media and the gutless anonymous foamers on social media and on the made for trolling forums such as this. Your second sentence is just crap by the way which renders your first sentence crap as...

Do any of you foamers even stop to think logically about some of these claims or do you just believe whatever presents itself in size 40 font on the front of your newspapers each day. Absoloutly hilarious that people fall for this. IIRC most of those on this thread fell for good old Roarser's...

And for all those taken in by the story this morning (by the way Santa Claus isn't real either) here is somethign from Mr Dank today.

Look out everyone - there's a lawyer in the house.:rolleyes: Never heard anything so ridiculous in my life. FFS - its not even true anyway. Total fiction and another lawsuit set in motion by Fairfax.

Hilarious.

So it seems like B1, B2 and Caro have been caught out telling pork pies again. One more additional law suit for everyone I guess.

Cheer Squad should put it on the banner this week,

I'm surprised Caro didn't try and infer the old pensioner smuggled the drugs from Mexico to Australia inside a prosthetic leg.

Jab I was not referring to the actual Bay 13 Board I was referring to the Trollsada Board aka The Bay 13 for Essendon Board. My point is that if mods are getting involved in this garbage it sends a signal to the other users that this sort of behavior is acceptable. Being a mod should carry...

Mods - there was some innuendo on the Bay 13 for Essendon Board last night surrounding some of the content of Hird's emails that were of a private nature. Now I have no doubt that it is completely made up as nobody would know this information and nor is it relevant to any investigation. One...

Both parties need to be locked in a room with someone like Bob Hawke and told not to leave until they have reached a compromised solution. If there is no clear result by the time the finals are reached it's going to be a disaster for everyone. For EFC, we are clearly going to struggle...

Any ASADA report is not meant to be used in any other investigation due to privacy concerns.

They might not be able to use the ASADA report at all.

Burnside and Rush will absolutely make mince-meat of these charges in court if the first one is anything to go by.

They can't. Its impossible.

And I wonder where that leak came from? Extremely unlikely that Hird or Essendon would leak anything to Fairfax and especially to either of the Lane's or Wilson - all of whom have been extremely hostile to Essendon throughout. The AFL's own solicitors can't even keep anything in house.

Do any of these idiots think? If the players were sanctioned then Hird and co would be walked out the door in any case. The AFL would know this. So why would the AFL take the risk of having the Essendon officials charges go to Court when by just sanctioning the players the risk of any court...

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/caroline-wilson-renews-push-for-hird-sacking.1007852/page-140#post-29525943

Not that I am aware of specifically however it did single out the club in general for attention.

My concern with the Ziggy Report is that I assume that all the Essendon Board all signed off on it. Meaning they agree with what is contained within. That could be tricky if we try to argue that what is in there is not a representation of the truth. I'm discounting the ASADA report all...