Agreed - his lawyers are worried. There’s something that isn’t in the ROI that they must need to get out of him into evidence. Unless he’s ignoring them and insisting on doing it because he still thinks he’s the smartest person in the room.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep. Fingers crossed that driving around with a body seemed a more pressing problem to him than driving around with a phone.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
https://www.9news.com.au/national/samantha-murphy-update-new-police-search-for-missing-mum-begins-in-ballarat/e52334aa-affe-447f-9cb1-fc8a99c2180f
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Channel Nine are reporting that there is footage of a sniffer dog digging the phone out of the mud and then being surrounded by high-fiving police.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Did you see the bit about reported sexual assaults being higher against those under 14 than those aged 15 and over?
Sexual assaults in men’s prisons is interesting as well.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
People who sexually assault are people who enjoy having sex with people who don’t want to have sex with them. That’s the point of it. Most men (I’d like to think) really don’t get a kick out of forcing themselves on people who are crying or screaming or frozen and traumatised.
Sent from my...
Yes, but my point is that sexual assault isn’t generally about liking the look of someone. It’s about wanting to dominate someone.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wonder if the hit and run narrative would have taken off to the same degree if Samantha Murphy was 20 years younger. People still assume sexual crimes are about sexual attraction, and that older women are not sexually attractive so are less likely to be targeted.
Sent from my iPhone using...
And disclosing where the bodies were means his lawyer can argue he’s shown remorse. They’re the only advantages he has left.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And likely driving bodies all over NSW in a GPS equipped van, with your own phone and one victim’s phone pinging off the same towers at the same time.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Interestingly, police are alleging Lamarre-Condon used a key to enter the property.
https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/police-divers-to-search-multiple-dams-for-jesse-baird-and-luke-davies-20240226-p5f7pp.html?btis
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It was reported in two or three articles on about Thursday or Friday, in the context of Jesse Baird’s move to Sydney from Brisbane. I remember thinking that renting from the ex’s mother probably gave the ex access to the house without needing to break in.
I can’t see it in any current articles...
You’d have to be as dumb as a bucket of hammers to plan to kill someone you could easily be linked to with your own service weapon inside a house they rent from your mother. It makes more sense to plan to use it to gain control of a situation that then goes badly wrong. He probably had something...
Unfortunately for him he self published a book just before the arrest - “Forest for the Trees” - claiming that Ron Logan was the killer. I don’t think it’s ageing well.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It’s a huge coincidence. Allen is a similar age to Kline senior, who Keegan Kline said could have accessed the Anthony Shots account.
It will be fascinating to find out if there is a link to Kline, and particularly whether Kline has rolled over on Allen as part of his negotiations. Or whether...
There’s a video of him setting off fireworks in a yard (during daylight hours which is random). The gait is the same.
One source is saying that an anonymous tip to search the river at a particular spot led to evidence that linked to Allen.
I get that the investigators want their moment at a...
Couldn’t agree more. This happens and happens a lot because people don’t accept that rules limiting what evidence a jury can hear are there for a reason.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I may be placing too much reliance on the jury using their words precisely in the note, but the text of that note suggests to me that the majority is voting guilty. The only circumstances in which a jury reach an agreement beyond reasonable doubt is where they find a person guilty. A verdict of...
FWIW, I don’t think a unanimous verdict is out of the question. I was surprised that they’ll be deliberating again tomorrow - I’d expected them to come back today and say positions were too entrenched.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.