Search results for query: *

Not bad odds for the Cats. Betting on the flag is pretty stupid though IMHO

Andrew Williams for FF! Um, on a serious note .. our forward line could look like this: Burns C Cloke Lockyer Didak Fraser Davis With Swan, Richards, Buckley, Walker, etc rotating through & playing in other positions. Who knows. Stranger things have happened

Brad Johnson, Matthew Scarlett, Mark Riccuito, Heath Scotland, Paul Chapman, Brady Rawlings

Agree with that. But in recent years, the Didak goal against Brisbane was better than Fevola's. Mainly because I hate Carlton.

David & Donald Cockatoo Collins

Maguire vs Rivers I saw both players today, and after earlier reading this thread I paid particular attention. Although one was playing against Brisbane and the other against Carlton, I thought Maguire was much better. Having said that though, McPharlin's 10x better than both of them if...

FF 1) Lloyd 2) Neitz 3) Hall 4) Tarrant 5) Gehrig 6) Lynch 7) Fevola 8) Richo CHF 1) Tredrea 2) Brown 3) Rocca 4) Riewoldt 5) Rawlings 6) Cornes 7) ?

Paul Roos or Gary Ayres

Re: Pretty tough... And of course Rupert's not a current player, but should be.

Pretty tough... Based on current players: B - Mark Johnson Darren Gaspar Ryan Lonie HB - Ben Matthews 5 Dion Woods C - Lenny Hayes Shaun McManus Shane Crawford HF - Rupert Betheras Travis Gaspar Matthew Lappin F - Adam Schneider 14 Byron Pickett Foll - Kepler Bradley Scott Burns Paul...

Licuria.

Libba could be closer to a senior coaching spot than we realise.

Nathan Brown's better than West and Simpson.

On Channel 7, Hutchy just said they're facing the sack for turning up to a team meeting in an inappropriate state. Given Hutchy's recent record with breaking news to the public, he would have to be pretty certain to say this.

Paul Licuria's had two. (And just as many club B&F's coincidentally)

Makes no sense, was a 1-1 draw.

A: No. Q: Who will finish higher in the Brownlow, Chris Judd or Matthew Pavlich?

Team 2.. Team 2 actually has Nathan Thompson, not Andrew Thompson :-) B Matthew Robbins Jonathan Hay Darren Milburn Hb Ryan Lonie Luke McPharlin Nigel Smart C Joel Corey Scott West Tyson Edwards Hf Matthew Bode Nathan Thompson Cameron Bruce F Steven Johnson Scott Welsh Shaun Burgoyne R...

1997: 7 Kris Massie 8 Chris Tarrant 9 Chad Cornes 10 Shane O'Bree 1998: 7 Josh Carr 8 Jude Bolton 9 Mark McVeigh 10 Brandon Hill (?) 1999: 7 Danny Roach (lol) 8 Joel Corey 9 Caydn Beetham 10 Luke McPharlin 2000: 7 Laurence Angwin 8 Daniel Motlop 9 Kayne Pettifer 10...

Or Jason Wild!

I think the Dogs will definitely be pushing hard to get a tall out of the Brown trade. Even if it is Henneman.

What about: Collingwood: Gain Brown, lose pick 17, Cole & McGough Essendon: Gain Cole, McGough and Pick 17 Bulldogs: Gain Solomon and Henneman

I doubt we can get both Stevens and Brown.. but it would be nice if we could. Given Bucks is 32 (?) next year, maybe basing a side around him in the centre isn't such a realistic idea.. perhaps we may look like this (if we got Brown AND Stevens): B: Clement Prestigiacomo Johnson HB...

Kingsley, Graham, Richardson and Rawlings up foward? Way too tall.

B: Johnson Prestigiacomo King HB: Clement Wakelin Cole C: Woewodin Buckley Lonie HF: Brown Rocca Burns F: Didak Tarrant Davidson R: Fraser O'Bree Licuria I: Scotland Richards Holland Shaw E: Lokan Walker Shackleton

What about Richard Cole and first rounder for Solomon? Cole has always wanted to play for Essendon and has talent (hasn't showed enough yet though)..

Nicest I've met are: Gavin Brown Terry Daniher Brad Johnson Paul Licuria Ryan Lonie Brodie Holland Josh Fraser Neil Balme Tarkyn Lockyer Alan Didak Matthew Lokan Rupert Betheras Richard Cole Chris Tarrant Doug Hawkins. Not so friendly: Jason Cloke Anthony Rocca Ben Kinnear

Wouldn't mind playing Port more than once, although I can't remember the last time we've played them in Melbourne? Was about 2000 as I recall.. The Adelaide trip, for most teams, is a difficult team and we consistently go there twice a year. Went to Perth twice last year, and I do agree...

Sydney's in Sydney. It's the AFL's problem really, not ours. We play all of the struggling opposition sides as away games because our superior attendances generate revenue for those teams, thus reducing the amount of handouts the AFL has to give them. Smart, really.

We're not playing Brisbane, Adelaide, Sydney and Essendon in the last four rounds? Damned easy draw that.