irel
Norm Smith Medallist
Yes, assuming there will not be rookie elevations and keeping a spare for the PSD.We have five spots free atm, so it's not neccessary to delist anyone to get Petterd.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Yes, assuming there will not be rookie elevations and keeping a spare for the PSD.We have five spots free atm, so it's not neccessary to delist anyone to get Petterd.
Is it me or were Melbourne better with Bailey then they are with neeld?
3 draft picks plus McKeever upgraded leaves 1 spot left.
Why do people want to keep a spot open for PSD? Unless there is a delistee we like through there - otherwise, it is those who didn't get called at the ND. Why on Earth would be budget for PSD?
We had 6 spots, we've recruited 2, from here, Huddo is most likely retiring, so call it 5 spots left. We have 3 live picks (ignoring those in the 5th round onwards) in the ND, and then another 2, either for rookie elevations (I don't think it should be McKeever - hasn't shown enough to warrant a spot on the senior list), PSD or Delisted Free Agents.
I would not be surprised to see us go after a delisted free agent, just because this seems to be the year everyone is cutting people, so if Kerr believes one delistee wasn't developed to their potential and is young enough, he could certainly go for him.
We did. And I'm not saying you can't find talent in the PSD - every year there is talent that slips through the draft, and some get picked up PSD, and some get picked up RD, and some don't get picked up at all... All I'm saying is, if you're budgeting on taking a pick in the PSD - you may as well take your 4th pick in the 90s (or whenever our 5th round pick is) - unless we're looking at a delistee who nominates for PSD, picking them up in R5 of the ND is a few picks earlier overall - less chance of them getting taken... You just don't budget for the PSD this far out.We got Rockliff from the PSD.
We did. And I'm not saying you can't find talent in the PSD - every year there is talent that slips through the draft, and some get picked up PSD, and some get picked up RD, and some don't get picked up at all... All I'm saying is, if you're budgeting on taking a pick in the PSD - you may as well take your 4th pick in the 90s (or whenever our 5th round pick is) - unless we're looking at a delistee who nominates for PSD, picking them up in R5 of the ND is a few picks earlier overall - less chance of them getting taken... You just don't budget for the PSD this far out.
If we are going to go a delisted free agent, Vossy has to be thinking Matthew Bate
Sorry would have been better if I knew how to cut and paste images. The Hair, the hair.Really? IMO, even with a big boost in his formline, Bate doesn't fill a need for us at all.
2 former Dees in a year is enough.
Don't worry Groo. I got the joke.Sorry would have been better if I knew how to cut and paste images. The Hair, the hair.
Well, we paid an early 2nd rounder for a guy who didn't get drafted numerous times in years past. I'm not saying we overpaid necessarily, but I'm saying we didn't get a discount at all - particularly seeing as GC pre-listed him for free - so we paid market value for someone who cost nothing. I would've thought a deal like that, we'd try more to get a mutually profitable deal - we get a discount, they get a pick. Not they get full price.
He's a good mark, and he's versatile. His age is alright for us - he'll be 26 by the start of season (someone said he is 24 - he's not). So he's got a few years left. He can (in theory) play ruck, back or fwd... None of them particularly great, but still... he's versatile... Enough to work with there, and he didn't cost us much, so i'm not livid.
But he's not a particularly good user of the ball. That's why if you look at the combined amounts of those highlights reels, you'll see that there are only 5 disposals - 3 of which were point blank kicks, 1 a good mark followed by a handball that put Moloney under pressure, and 1 decent goal kick from 40m. One decent disposal in 3.5 minutes of highlights isn't exactly setting the world on fire. So IMO, he'll be in our best ~28-30 - decent depth - we didn't overpay, so i'm not unhappy with it... but short of Leuey or Longer going down, Lisle being out of form and Huddo being retired, I don't think we'll need him, and even then, he'd be ruck support when shipping out of the goal square.
Not having a huge whinge, just not writing home about it.
I would say the difference, keeping in mind that I am no expert, is as follows. In the ND there is a great deal of focus put into getting the early picks right. We are picking two of them in the mid 20's -30's. The shear amount of work that would go into heaps of players that we don't pick up because someone got them first can not be disregarded. nearly all clubs would be in a similar situation and therefore the picks towards the end would get more speculative.We did. And I'm not saying you can't find talent in the PSD - every year there is talent that slips through the draft, and some get picked up PSD, and some get picked up RD, and some don't get picked up at all... All I'm saying is, if you're budgeting on taking a pick in the PSD - you may as well take your 4th pick in the 90s (or whenever our 5th round pick is) - unless we're looking at a delistee who nominates for PSD, picking them up in R5 of the ND is a few picks earlier overall - less chance of them getting taken... You just don't budget for the PSD this far out.
Why do people want to keep a spot open for PSD? Unless there is a delistee we like through there - otherwise, it is those who didn't get called at the ND. Why on Earth would be budget for PSD?
We had 6 spots, we've recruited 2, from here, Huddo is most likely retiring, so call it 5 spots left. We have 3 live picks (ignoring those in the 5th round onwards) in the ND, and then another 2, either for rookie elevations (I don't think it should be McKeever - hasn't shown enough to warrant a spot on the senior list), PSD or Delisted Free Agents.
I would not be surprised to see us go after a delisted free agent, just because this seems to be the year everyone is cutting people, so if Kerr believes one delistee wasn't developed to their potential and is young enough, he could certainly go for him.
Didn't say I wanted I action packed highlights package (would've hoped he had at least as good a highlights package as the average draftee, but oh well). Didn't say I wanted more goals. Didn't question avg disposals or anything. He's an average ruckman, I can take that - we didn't pay much, no real loss. If you read what I wrote, you'd see my complaint wasn't any of the above, but that he is a crap user of the ball. I also provided a balanced opinion in the first paragraph, specifically pointing out that his age, versatility and marking ability were assets for us. However, I see him as below Longer, Leuey, and cutting into Lisle's time (who i view as a similar quality player, but with a LOT more development to come than Stefan).They guy has played a total of 57 games in 5 seasons and you want him to have an action packed highlight package for you...come on you can't be serious..Martin has kicked 23 goals playing as a ruckman for Melbourne our own Matthew Leunberger has only kicked 11 and has played 69 games.. In 2012 again playing as a ruckman when he replaced Jaimar he played 7 games and kicked 7 goals...He averages more disposals and Marks than Leunberger aswell. He will be in the best 22 once he cements his spot which will be ruck/forward role he will surprise a lot of people!! Let's not forget that he is a former basketball player so it might take him a few more games to hone his skills but that didn't stop him finishing 8th in Melbourne's Best and fairest in 2011. Plenty of upside I say!!
I thought under the Irish recruit rules we could keep him there for a while extra? Maybe - as with most, I'm no expert on list rules. Regardless, I'm not budgeting it simply because I don't know that he's earned a senior list spot. Wouldn't be dismayed to see him go. That said, the Irish do take some development, and I thought we should cut Hanley up til about 2 years ago (still not as sold as many, but agree that he's best 22 now).McKeever needs to be elevated or cut, he can't stay on the rookie list IIRC. That's why people are saying he will be upgraded. From there, we might not even use that 1 pick in the PSD, if there isn't anyone we like we might just pass altogether and keep that spot free and save some money.
We might go for another FA, but I think we will keep 1 pick in the PSD for Tippett, just in case.
Why do people want to keep a spot open for PSD? Unless there is a delistee we like through there - otherwise, it is those who didn't get called at the ND. Why on Earth would be budget for PSD?