List Mgmt. 2015 LIST Discussion - trades, free agency etc

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thought Curnow was awesome on the weekend running back to lay tackles and put on pressure in the defensive 50. I think our list is a long way from pushing him out due to poor skills.

People here will also be amazed at how a guy like Curnow's skills, and the skills of our whole team in general, can suddenly drastically improve and look great simply due to a better gameplan and structures that are implemented well, making it easier for our players to hit targets.
 
We absolutely need to turn the list over, but we need to make sure it remains as balanced as possible along the way. Gold Coast went hard at youth without a whole lot of senior support and you can see what happened there. GWS played it better (under SOS) by playing a number of experienced players alongside their young talent to ensure they learnt what it was to be an AFL player.

We are about to finish 17th now with a raft of senior players so I don't think we need worry to much young guys not being able to win games.
 
Senior delist: Carrazzo, Judd, Ellard, Tutt, Warnock, Watson (consider re-rookie), Jones (subject to TPP considerations)

Rookie delist: Fields, Wood (if we have a guaranteed elevation written up for him we're idiots), Russell, Johnson

Rookie promote: Byrne, Sheehan

Re-sign: Armfield (1 year), Curnow (2 years), Kreuzer (3 years), Holman (2 years), Giles (1 year with 1 year option), Everitt (2 years with 1 year option)

Trade: White (upgrade our 3rd round pick into 2nd round), Rowe (free to a good home), Henderson (pick 10 and change)

Ideal incomings:

PSD: Carlisle
Trade: Stewart for pick 19
Draft: Weitering, pick 10, Pick 30ish, Rice, SOSOS
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Senior delist: Carrazzo, Judd, Ellard, Tutt, Warnock, Watson (consider re-rookie), Jones (subject to TPP considerations)

Rookie delist: Fields, Wood (if we have a guaranteed elevation written up for him we're idiots), Russell, Johnson

Rookie promote: Byrne, Sheehan

Re-sign: Armfield (1 year), Curnow (2 years), Kreuzer (3 years), Holman (2 years), Giles (1 year with 1 year option), Everitt (2 years with 1 year option)

Trade: White (upgrade our 3rd round pick into 2nd round), Rowe (free to a good home), Henderson (pick 10 and change)

Ideal incomings:

PSD: Carlisle
Trade: Stewart for pick 19
Draft: Weitering, pick 10, Pick 30ish, Rice, SOSOS

I'd say you'd be very close on the de-listings and I don't mind the notion of rookie-ing Watson.........but I just don't think he'll get that far.

White's not going anywhere. Contracted for another year and he'll see that through.
 
So we go into 2016 with Kreuzer as our only ruckman?
Korcheck will be coming in it seems, and then you've got Casboult, Carlisle and Stewart who can pinch hit, that's before we've used any picks in the ND or RD on additional support or talent to develop.

There's plenty better than Wood and Warnock available outside the system, and I really don't see us using a second ruck next year, even with the changes to rotations and a likely 3rd man up rule.

I'd say you'd be very close on the de-listings and I don't mind the notion of rookie-ing Watson.........but I just don't think he'll get that far.

White's not going anywhere. Contracted for another year and he'll see that through.
I'd rather White did go somewhere, so that we try and retain as much talent on our list as we can and give up on guys who aren't going to play a role for us by the end of 2016. White could do well at somewhere like the Dogs, who could use a senior body for defensive support over the season.
 
Wood is contracted anyway so he's going nowhere....
What is the nature of this contract? Is it an option in addition to his rookie contract, or have we guaranteed him senior elevation?

Our list is even more cooked if we're gifting Wood an elevation.
 
For mine, a "suitable trade" is one that immediately improves the list by doing the deal.

Even if the improvement is only a step-up from "OK" to "kind of good"? Is there much value in trading Casboult for a slightly better player who we then try to offload after another 2 years when a slightly better option comes along? Are we not better off retaining Casboult and improving the structure around him to make the most of his strengths?

Apologies for the tone of my first response to you - definitely came off much more critical than I intended. I just worry that by gutting the list in a very short space of time we may actually make it harder for our next generation of players to reach their potential. It needs to be done, but it needs to be done smart.

I'd actually rather our seniors continued to struggle next season while our reserves pushed up the ladder if it means we're creating a better environment for players to develop. Right now our reserves get knocked from pillar to post, and due to injuries we've got players who are nowhere near the grade being called up to the seniors. That doesn't build confidence nor does it develop skill.
 
Wood is moving to the senior list for next season, and frankly he deserves it.

He may not be the most talented big man out there, but one thing you can be sure of is that he gives it everything he's got. We'd have been completely stuffed without him a number of times over the past two seasons.
 
Even if the improvement is only a step-up from "OK" to "kind of good"? Is there much value in trading Casboult for a slightly better player who we then try to offload after another 2 years when a slightly better option comes along? Are we not better off retaining Casboult and improving the structure around him to make the most of his strengths?

Apologies for the tone of my first response to you - definitely came off much more critical than I intended. I just worry that by gutting the list in a very short space of time we may actually make it harder for our next generation of players to reach their potential. It needs to be done, but it needs to be done smart.

I'd actually rather our seniors continued to struggle next season while our reserves pushed up the ladder if it means we're creating a better environment for players to develop. Right now our reserves get knocked from pillar to post, and due to injuries we've got players who are nowhere near the grade being called up to the seniors. That doesn't build confidence nor does it develop skill.

I understand where you are coming from now, thanks for the clarification.

I don't disagree with you at all, turning over the list and building one capable of consistently playing finals and hopefully winning flags takes time and normally follows a strategic plan of some sort.

Our recruiting has been spasmodic at best for a very long time and we are paying the penalty for that now. We need to build a foundation from which to launch from with each player brought in possessing some non-negotiables (eg. disposal skills & fighting spirit).

There is no quick fix these days, we have to take the pain to get the gain and I'd like to think that the vast majority of Blues supporters across the country will be patient during this period (keep taking out memberships etc) in the knowledge that the good times will come again.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Wood is moving to the senior list for next season, and frankly he deserves it.

He may not be the most talented big man out there, but one thing you can be sure of is that he gives it everything he's got. We'd have been completely stuffed without him a number of times over the past two seasons.
Frankly I disagree, and you only need to look at his efforts vs those of Kreuzer. He's not the 2010s version of Barnaby French, he's just an honest battler who's not built for the modern game despite his work ethic and clean hands. Giving him a year when we don't have to would be a mistake and could cost us someone like Armfield or Curnow, who would genuinely support the 22 next year.
 
What is the nature of this contract? Is it an option in addition to his rookie contract, or have we guaranteed him senior elevation?

Our list is even more cooked if we're gifting Wood an elevation.

You may wish to re-phrase that.

Options open on Wood. If we retain 38/6 split, then no rush to get him onto a senior list.
 
You may wish to re-phrase that.

Options open on Wood. If we retain 38/6 split, then no rush to get him onto a senior list.
Good point, but I'd still want us to rookie another ruck in addition to Korcheck (assuming we don't pick up one in the national draft).

Yes four rucks are a luxury for established clubs, but Wood is a stop gap and Korcheck is highly speculative.
 
Thanks Christ you're not running things at the club right now - we'd go into 2016 without a forward line...

I don't disagree with the split between past, present and future, but I reckon the "present" group need to be phased out over the next 3-4 years as their replacements mature, rather than being cut adrift ASAP.
Sounds familiar to the last few years of trades:eek:
 
Frankly I disagree, and you only need to look at his efforts vs those of Kreuzer. He's not the 2010s version of Barnaby French, he's just an honest battler who's not built for the modern game despite his work ethic and clean hands. Giving him a year when we don't have to would be a mistake and could cost us someone like Armfield or Curnow, who would genuinely support the 22 next year.

Not sure why you are comparing him to Kreuzer who is obviously significantly superior to Wood, and probably every other player on the list, when it comes to effort.

It is no shame that a player is unable to emulate the effort we see from Kreuzer out on the field, and it is certainly not reason enough to get rid of him.

Wood does not have claims to be the number one ruck at the club but has shown himself to be a very capable replacement should our preferred option be unavailable for whatever reason, be it injury or suspension.

To be going into next year with Kreuzer as our only plausible option in the ruck (if he stays) is inviting disaster. Would be a horrendous error from the club.
 
Giving him a year when we don't have to would be a mistake and could cost us someone like Armfield or Curnow, who would genuinely support the 22 next year.

I don't follow.

If it's list spots... He's already a nominated rookie, which means we went into the season a player short on our primary list.

If it's salary cap... If we're losing Judd, Carrazzo, Henderson, Warnock, Yarran that's $1-1.5million freed up on those 5 alone.
 
With your pick 2 if weitering is still there get him
And if Kirean Collins is still there at your pick 20 get him and us will have a fb and a CHB for the future
If chris yarran goes to Richmond for a second round pick use that on Bailey rice and Henderson for geelongs second round use that for James aish and probably tom bell in that deal because reported that he wants a move back to Queensland
 
List spots will be very tight. I'm hearing of about 5 players coming via trades and you'd want to take at least 5 picks in the national draft.

Say we draft Weitering, Pick 9~ (Henderson), Pick 20~, Rice, SOSOS we also almost definitely have Carlisle coming in and my guess is we'll at least trade in another 3 players on top of that. 9 players in!!!

Who goes out? Judd, Carrazzo, Ellard, Watson, Warnock, Henderson are 6. Most likely Bell makes it 7. We may have to make a touch decision on the likes of Armfield, Dick, Tutt or Jones.
 
THE PAST
Robert Warnock - contract expires, delist or trade
Andrew Carrazzo - retiring at end of season
Chris Judd - retired
David Ellard - being delisted at end of season
Ed Curnow - contract expires, delist or trade
Matthew Watson - contract expires, delist or trade
Blaine Johnson - contract expires, delist
Fraser Russell - don't waste my time !!
Mathew Dick - delist

THE PRESENT
Dennis Armfield - 29yo whose contract expires this year, subject to other movements, may get another year
Jason Tutt - very poor recruiting decision, play in the 2nds till contract runs out in 2016 or delist now
Zach Touhy - contracted till 2016, trade at any time subject to offer
Cameron Wood - play till contract runs out in 2016
Levi Casboult - contracted till 2016, trade now whilst we can
Kade Simpson - contracted till 2016, retire then
Sam Rowe - play till contract runs out in 2016
Andrew Walker - play till contract runs out in 2017, trade at any time if possible
Michael Jamison - play till contract runs out in 2017, trade at any time if possible
Dale Thomas - play till contract runs out in 2017
Liam Jones - very poor recruiting decision, play in the seconds till contract runs out in 2017
Marc Murphy - contracted till 2018, only trade if an offer too good to refuse is received
Bryce Gibbs - contracted till 2019, trade next year
Ciaran Sheehan - sign him for one year
Simon White - play till he retires in a year or two

THE FUTURE
Dylan Buckley
Andrejs Everitt
Sam Docherty
Nick Graham
Patrick Cripps
Cameron Giles
Matthew Kreuzer
Kristian Jaksch
Mark Whiley
Nick Holman
Dillon Viojo-Rainbow
Clem Smith
Ciaran Byrne
Blaine Boekhorst

THE COLLATERAL DAMAGE
Chris Yarran - trade to Freo in exchange for Alex Pearce
Lachie Henderson - trade to highest bidder, must get a first-rounder in return
Troy Menzel - trade now whilst his currency is still high, worth a first-rounder
Tom Bell - trade to one of the QLD clubs, get a decent player in return

THE UNKNOWN
Jayden Foster
Tom Fields
Brad Walsh
Billy Gowers

THE DRAFT & TRADES
- two mid-sized utlities
- three young project ruckman
- four young key position players
- five young inside mids

Very much on the money with some significant reservations.

1. Curnow is a required player and well ahead of similar players BB, Whiley and Holman who you (not me) see as part of our future.
2. I would put Jaksch, Smith and DVR in the "unknowns" list. None of these 3 have shown they will make it, though they still have time.
3.I wouldn't cry myself to sleep if we said goodbye to Fields.
4. It would be quite beyond expectations to trade Yarran for Alex Pearce.
 
If we were ton trade Hendo & Yarran for second rounders , SOS should be sacked immediately.
Enough gifting of quality players for peanuts, we've lost to many in the last few years for naught.
I'm sure SOS is well aware of it, if offers are ridiculous Yarran stays contacted and Hendo is delisted.
Ciao
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top