2016 Non Crows AFL Discussion thread Part 2

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Well, that's the biggest 4-goal win I've seen for some time! Nic-Nat was a beast and I am forced to admit I was wrong about Jetta: that's the best game I've seen him play for years. His harassment and speed tackling was Charlie-like. Yeo did his best to gift it away, though. Cyril, Mitchell, Frawley and many others were non-events. God that Hodge is a campaigner, but he was cowed by the end. There were a few freekickHawthorns, but, on the whole, Hawthorn's continuous whinging to the umpires didn't have the desired effect.
 
On Hawks manning up on the man on the mark: This needs attention and clarity from the AFL and rules committee. Seems to me that it's legal to stand next to the guy but it's not legal to block him from moving - As long as the ball is not within 5 metres? But the kicker is moving in, may or may not be 5 metres. IMO they should extend the 'protected area' rule to include staying clear of the man on the mark. Just for clarity.
 
Foxtel commentators finally starting to talk some sense about the gutless punching plague that's infested the AFL in recent years.

Eddie Mcguire: 1 week suspension for any punch

Jono Brown: shouldn't miss a game, but fine 10-20k

Dermie Brereton: um, shouldn't be missing a game, mumble mumble something about $1000 fine, but I don't like it and should be stamped out

McClure: grunt
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Foxtel commentators finally starting to talk some sense about the gutless punching plague that's infested the AFL in recent years.

Eddie Mcguire: 1 week suspension for any punch

Jono Brown: shouldn't miss a game, but fine 10-20k

Dermie Brereton: um, shouldn't be missing a game, mumble mumble something about $1000 fine, but I don't like it and should be stamped out

McClure: grunt
It's bizarre that the AFL have allowed it to get to this. How is it acceptable to punch someone? The impact of the punch shouldn't come into it. What kind of message is that sending to kids?
 
On Hawks manning up on the man on the mark: This needs attention and clarity from the AFL and rules committee. Seems to me that it's legal to stand next to the guy but it's not legal to block him from moving - As long as the ball is not within 5 metres? But the kicker is moving in, may or may not be 5 metres. IMO they should extend the 'protected area' rule to include staying clear of the man on the mark. Just for clarity.
Yep. Same rule for both sides. Stay out of the zone.
 
That would be nice!

I also recall a late season game a couple years ago where we got out of the blocks with 5 goals until the WC midfield absolutely smashed us.

Priddis is the key.
Can we get over Port tomorrow night first please?
 
It's bizarre that the AFL have allowed it to get to this. How is it acceptable to punch someone? The impact of the punch shouldn't come into it. What kind of message is that sending to kids?
Exactly. The AFL is the biggest bunch of hypocrites going around. Say no to racism, homophobia, domestic violence but blokes punchin' on is alright. He's just bein' a lad 'ey kids? Pay attention.

Off topic, has anyone else made the correlation between Priddis and Shirley Temple?
 
On Hawks manning up on the man on the mark: This needs attention and clarity from the AFL and rules committee. Seems to me that it's legal to stand next to the guy but it's not legal to block him from moving - As long as the ball is not within 5 metres? But the kicker is moving in, may or may not be 5 metres. IMO they should extend the 'protected area' rule to include staying clear of the man on the mark. Just for clarity.
Yet I saw a game last week where the umpire pushed the team mate away from mark. I thought finally. So it was a 1 week rule?
 
The fear on the Port Board that we might win this year is delicious
351wf3d.jpg


:D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top