GreyCrow
Make me an Admin!
- Mar 21, 2016
- 83,149
- 137,031
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Sturt, White Sox
If you were to use the black and white approach then it would become a non-contact sport. In the back would be in the back regardless of whether the player in front moved back into the elbows of the defender etc.Indeed, the really difficult thing would be coming up with reasonable objective or at least semi-objective signs/prompts to replace the subjective interpretations. Even the word I just used - 'reasonable' - is subjective. A good rule to me could be a stupid rule in someone else's opinion. Indeed the idea of a last-touch rule for OOB makes me feel a bit uncomfortable.
Hence making the rules less subjective will inevitably remain in the too-hard basket.
I watch NFL and the technicality of the game is amazing. Yet its also a game contained within the moment ie each play is separate from the last only connected by the distance required to cover.
Aussie Rules is truly one of the few multi-spacial games that has different rule interpretations based on where on the field an infringement occurs, or even time of the game or the importance of the game. NBA basketball also plays to this loose interpretation of rules v game-time.