- Aug 18, 2009
- 1,945
- 4,755
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Tottenham Hotspur
Pick 2 is overs. Pick 2 and 21 for 5 and Weller isn't. If we get pick 2 for this and keep pick 5 I'd be doing things to myself that would never allow me in a church.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Music to my ears that the AFL media are spruiking Weller as a gun worthy of a high 1st round pick. It's GC so they don't have anyone in their corner trying to help them out in the media. Better believe if Weller wanted to go to a Vic club all the talk would be for a early 2nd rounder.Trade Radio saying we should be asking for Jack Martin.
Also reckon that Weller this year would be pick 5 - 10.
Don't like the 5->2 upgrade as I am not convinced their is a big enough disparity in those players (I could be wrong of course). I'd rather two early twenties since 1 would go to GWS anyway.Pick 2 is overs. Pick 2 and 21 for 5 and Weller isn't. If we get pick 2 for this and keep pick 5 I'd be doing things to myself that would never allow me in a church.
Can you imagine Bennell on one HFF and Martin on the other?Please god make this happen. I'd be more excited for him than I was for Bennell.
That rates Weller at pick 13. Lose the 40 and replace it with our 4th round pick or lose it completely. Rates him at pick 9 and 7 respectively.I am quite sure the price won't be pick 2. We are just going through the bartering motions.
21 + 24 + Matera for Weller + 40 is my guess. If we are really lucky we might be able to fleece their 2018 1st (if they think they are going up the ladder a bit) for Weller and something but I doubt it.
Get him home for a fair price (which is slight overs because contract).
Could our medico staff competently get Martin on the park for 22 games a year?
I thought Conca wanted to stay?Apparently Richmond are offering Conca for Balic.
I'd obviously do that but these trades never seem to be as we like so I expect some level of dissatisfaction. If we got to keep 40 that is actually about as good of a deal as I think we can get. I'd love to be wrong of course.That rates Weller at pick 13. Lose the 40 and replace it with our 4th round pick or lose it completely. Rates him at pick 9 and 7 respectively.
Big call. Am I missing something when it comes to Jack Martin? Because in my eyes hes seriously overrated, all hype for little result.Please god make this happen. I'd be more excited for him than I was for Bennell.
I like it. We get a future first and use the second on Wilson. GC get Weller and another second in a strong draft.If he is worth pick 10ish. How about their future 1st and a 2nd rounder this year for our future 2nd and Weller?
Where are they saying this?Sheahan + Nixon are saying that today they found out Hogan is seriously considering playing for Freo next year.
I don't see this happening in 2 days.
Keep in mind, these guys knew about Weller last week.
Weller to GC.Sheahan + Nixon are saying that today they found out Hogan is seriously considering playing for Freo next year.
I don't see this happening in 2 days.
Keep in mind, these guys knew about Weller last week.
Weren't you on the *stop with the Hogan Posts* wagon?Sheahan + Nixon are saying that today they found out Hogan is seriously considering playing for Freo next year.
I don't see this happening in 2 days.
Keep in mind, these guys knew about Weller last week.
I am with you. He does some nice things but I have never seen him take a game by the horns and stand-out.Big call. Am I missing something when it comes to Jack Martin? Because in my eyes hes seriously overrated, all hype for little result.
I think they would be optimistic enough to think that they might improve on 17th at least. Only need 4 more wins or so to jump up to 13th this year. So in that sense and with the "super draft" factor aside I think they would be more likely to trade 2018 first.I would much rather their 2018 first rounder than pick #2 this year because we already have #5 and there are far more players we need next year. Remember in 2015 when we parted with our future 2nd (ended up being #22) and only got #35? Or in 2016 when we got #35 for our future 2nd (currently pick #25)?
So using that same logic I think their future 1st would average out to pick #15. So that plus a 3rd upgraded to a 2nd sounds fair to me.
Possibly be dreaming but it might be more palatable to them than spending #2 this year.
Weren't you on the *stop with the Hogan Posts* wagon?
Where are they saying this?