Demonkings
Team Captain
We should just draft three Queensland kids this year and if one or maybe two of them become ok, we get about eight first round picks from Gold Coast in two years time
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We should just draft three Queensland kids this year and if one or maybe two of them become ok, we get about eight first round picks from Gold Coast in two years time
We should just draft three Queensland kids this year and if one or maybe two of them become ok, we get about eight first round picks from Gold Coast in two years time
As much as I haven't been stoked with some of our decisions over the last couple of weeks, at least we're not Gold Coast
So this is a small thing, but I mentioned in the Watts thread a couple times.
Why did we not at least offer Watts + 36 for 31 and 34. Easily jump up a couple spots for nothing. Port have just traded that 34 in some ridiculous swap of late picks. We could have had it.
Like there's this theory going round that we go in and just get stuff done, but why not actually stop and think for a bit and get a better deal?
Makes me think we should have played WAY harder ball with Lever. He wanted to leave. We should only be finding out about the deal now. You'd have to think it would have been a better deal for us. Why not be ruthless?
If we did though, surely Port would have gone for it (given what they ended up trading it for). Which tends to indicate we didn't. Given how hasty we were to give up 2 first rounders for Lever, I wouldn't put it past us not having even looked at it.I would like to think that we did make the attempt for that
I think so too. Massive draft haul last year and a strong hand next year means you can be a bit fast and loose with this years, even though it's a big pick.To be fair i just listened to Scott Clayton and after hearing him speak I an see why they gave up pick 2.
They had 4 top 10 picks last year and next year in a supposed super draft have 2 first round picks, 2 second round picks and 2 third round picks. Adding Weller to that list that is a pretty good draft hand over a 3 year period. So getting rid of pick 2 this year isn't a big deal all things being equal
Yep paid overs for Lever, Got unders for Watts.I feel a bit despondent after that trade period.
Yes, we got Lever.
But we lost two first round draft picks and Jack Watts... and our first pick, in a very shallow draft, is pick 29.
We did poorly.
Unless we somehow get another Hunt with those late picks, we're just going to get five players that we will have to delist in two years time.
We've wasted opportunities and I feel like we are going to pay for it.
That, and we're not automatically putting our draft picks into next years Rd 1 best 22 line up these days. Can actually let them develop in the VFL for a couple of yearsActually pretty excited about picks 29, 31 and 36.
Taylor plucked Hannan out of nowhere with 46 last year and ANB at 40 a few years back. Gawn was a 34th selection and both the McDonalds/Nev Jetta were over 50 picks. So it’s not as dire as a lot are making it out to be.
Gee Essendon knows how to trade.
Stringer for 25 and 30 is robbery.
Dees need to seriously study the Bombres.
Don't understand why they didn't throw everything at RockliffYou mean the team who has a glaring weakness in midfield and has done very little to rectify it? Don’t get me wrong, in terms of what they gave up the Bombers did very well. They still have a very imbalanced midfield and they can’t be a serious contender until they fix it.
Yep, they have a big ugly hole in the Inside Mid department, and they bring in a half back and two forwards who might play some midfield minutes.You mean the team who has a glaring weakness in midfield and has done very little to rectify it? Don’t get me wrong, in terms of what they gave up the Bombers did very well. They still have a very imbalanced midfield and they can’t be a serious contender until they fix it.
Essendon 2018 will be similar to Port Adelaide 2017. They’ll beat up on the lower ranked teams, but will be completely found out by good, contested sides. Team full of one-way runners that will be smashed around the contest and in transition. They’ll be pretty to watch though.You mean the team who has a glaring weakness in midfield and has done very little to rectify it? Don’t get me wrong, in terms of what they gave up the Bombers did very well. They still have a very imbalanced midfield and they can’t be a serious contender until they fix it.
Their trading smacks of a club gearing up to have a big flag tilt over the next couple of years before Hurley and Hooker start to fade. At least that’s my guess. But none of those three they traded in are a sure bet to work out either. If they get Stringer firing though, their forward line is going to be very potent.Yep, they have a big ugly hole in the Inside Mid department, and they bring in a half back and two forwards who might play some midfield minutes.
They did really well with the deals themselves, no doubt about it, but I think they got carried away with players actually wanting to play for them.
It's like Collingwood last year. Needed a key forward so they go out & recruit Mayne, Wells & Dunn.Yep, they have a big ugly hole in the Inside Mid department, and they bring in a half back and two forwards who might play some midfield minutes.
They did really well with the deals themselves, no doubt about it, but I think they got carried away with players actually wanting to play for them.
25 and 30 for a gambling addict with other (significant) off-field problems who hasn't played well for two years and whose teammates can't stand him is win/win IMO.Gee Essendon knows how to trade.
Stringer for 25 and 30 is robbery.
Dees need to seriously study the Bombres.
They've already got Stringer and Goddard in the team. That's two more giant flogs than most teams have.Don't understand why they didn't throw everything at Rockliff
Compared to Adelaide's trade for Gibbs, we got Lever for a steal. What the heck were Adelaide thinking there?
My God you just made me realise: Goddard and Stringer. Wow. I would like to be a fly on the wall for that first awkward interaction between the two of them. Probably be a lot like a scene from the beginning of 2001 a space odyssey.25 and 30 for a gambling addict with other (significant) off-field problems who hasn't played well for two years and whose teammates can't stand him is win/win IMO.
They've already got Stringer and Goddard in the team. That's two more giant flogs than most teams have.