List Mgmt. 2017 Trade & FA Targets Part 2

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
You also have to look at the timeline in this.
Rfa period opens before trade.
If Fyfes coming to us. Then expect that announcement to be on day 1. We'll also know straight away if Freo are matching or not. All this gets organized behind the scenes beforehand.
We'll already have a plan in place of what to offer if that happens 3 days later when trade opens.
Now if we havnt made a FA bid for Fyfe when trade opens expect the big offers for Kelly to come through. Ofcourse that is if Kelly hasnt already nominated beforehand.
But if Fyfe announces us and Freo say they match and we have to trade it might get tricky for our negotiations with Kelly if he does want to come to us if we cant make an agreement with Freo.
The post season crew will be earning their pay this year.
 
IF Fyfe agrees to come to us then it's 100% guaranteed that Freo match. To think otherwise is just a ridiculous fantasy. Freo are not a charity.
Or, if Freo don't match then expect a cheaper than normal trade for Hickey or heaven forbid Blake :thumbsdown:
 

Log in to remove this ad.

IF Fyfe agrees to come to us then it's 100% guaranteed that Freo match. To think otherwise is just a ridiculous fantasy. Freo are not a charity.

If thats the case it seems unrealistic we get both? Cant we front load his contract to take that option out? Surely we dont have the draft picks to satisfy both clubs. If we had to chose I would take Kelly...
 
IF Fyfe agrees to come to us then it's 100% guaranteed that Freo match. To think otherwise is just a ridiculous fantasy. Freo are not a charity.

If that is the case keep him, their compensation pick could easily be top 5 what would we be giving up to beat that.

Then there's just the small matter of a bucket of cash, no thanks.

****ing hell here we go again click, click boom.

I thought the saints had moved on, I guess not.
 
If thats the case it seems unrealistic we get both? Cant we front load his contract to take that option out? Surely we dont have the draft picks to satisfy both clubs. If we had to chose I would take Kelly...
They calculate the contract over the whole amount and divide it per year.
 
The way some of us talk about going into the Trade and FA period, reminds me of the bottom panel of this comic strip (which you'll find on many an academic's facebook feed, fyi):

sarah_andersen_books.jpg
 
Or, if Freo don't match then expect a cheaper than normal trade for Hickey or heaven forbid Blake :thumbsdown:

I wouldn't trade Acres no matter what. Fyfe looks like a half strength version these days. Acres potential is full Fyfe.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I don't agree on Rocky being less than Kelly. I would love both. Rocky has been the brick in shit sides where Kelly gets off the leash because he's at a club with 5 other guys who take the heat off him. Rocky is what he is though and is unlikely to get any better, you imagine the scope for improvement is still massive for Kelly.
Genuine question: has Kelly ever copped a really hard tag / team focus? If so, how did he go? My one concern with his price is that currently he looks great running free with all those great players around him. Is this a true reflection?
 
Then why would he leave if Freo offer him the same money?

Because freo arent going to offer him the 1.5mil we are.... unless they are forced to.

They will have put a mill a year in front of him right now, saying please stay.

They could save themselves a pile of money if he re-signs this year
 
Genuine question: has Kelly ever copped a really hard tag / team focus? If so, how did he go? My one concern with his price is that currently he looks great running free with all those great players around him. Is this a true reflection?
pretty sure he copped a greenwood tag when they played collingwood and he's taken a few players out of games this year. kelly finished with 36 touches, 11 tackles and a goal.
 
If thats the case it seems unrealistic we get both? Cant we front load his contract to take that option out? Surely we dont have the draft picks to satisfy both clubs. If we had to chose I would take Kelly...

If the hawks pick is a top 3 pick you'd think freo would be happy enough with that- maybe that plus some steaknives?

Hawks pick and steaknives for fyfe
Our 2 first rounders for jelly
 
Very amusing coming from a poster who has been tearing up at the thought of Fyfe leaving Fremantle.

Yes, yes spend all your picks on Kelly they will never get my precious then.

I would put in the piss take emojis but I'm a Luddite on this ipad.

huh, wtf are you on about? and wtf does that have to do with my question on how norf got an extra 1st rounder?
 
If we get fyfe and kelly isn't a safe bet to say our 2018 first rounder is likely a late one?

If we remain mid table like we are now for the rest of the season (or improve and play finals?), then our 2017 1st pick is a mid rounder.
So you agree that isn't a 'lousy' deal, infact you say where do we sign?


As for fyfe for the hawks pick being a 'lousy' deal..... I respectfully, wholeheartedly disagree.

It's a bloody fantastic deal.

You are judging it against an option that is a complete fairytale (RFA, no picks needed).
Forget it, it's just not possible because:
A. Freo want to keep him
B. Fyfe doesn't HATE freo, he isn't desperate to leave
C. Freo have plenty of cap space

We would need at least 1 of those factors to be false in order for us (or anyone) to have a shot at getting him as an RFA.

Do yourself a favour and forget about free agency and judge fyfe for hawks pick against other big trades for young brownlow winners.

Like judd to carlton for instance?!

Fyfe for hawks pick (which only cost us pick 10!!!!) is an incredible deal for us.
Don't forget Long and Battle for free
 
Because freo arent going to offer him the 1.5mil we are.... unless they are forced to.

They will have put a mill a year in front of him right now, saying please stay.

They could save themselves a pile of money if he re-signs this year
So, in other words, Fyfe is going to force the club that he captains to pay massive overs by signing with Saints then forcing Freo to match?? I reckon if he wants to stay at Freo then he negotiates a fair deal properly with them. Otherwise, it means he wants out.
 
So, in other words, Fyfe is going to force the club that he captains to pay massive overs by signing with Saints then forcing Freo to match?? I reckon if he wants to stay at Freo then he negotiates a fair deal properly with them. Otherwise, it means he wants out.
the only reason freo would match a ridiculous offer would be so they can force a trade and get more than they otherwise would with straight compensation. its not because they're actually willing to pay him that amount. if he's accepted the saints offer than freo will know he wants to leave and that will be it. they will just match so they can get the best value possible in return.
 
huh, wtf are you on about? and wtf does that have to do with my question on how norf got an extra 1st rounder?
Wires crossed here clearly I have no idea what your talking about with regard to north and first rounders.

I thought you were having a laugh going back to the jokes about me being a north supporter when I first joined.

Hence the Fremantle joke, sorry.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top