GreyCrow
Make me an Admin!
- Mar 21, 2016
- 82,624
- 135,937
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Sturt, White Sox
Sell the farm4 phrases I don’t want to hear again for a long time
Play out
Stump up
In this space
I’m Peter Jackson
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sell the farm4 phrases I don’t want to hear again for a long time
Play out
Stump up
In this space
I’m Peter Jackson
LOL you forgot the smiley face. Modra says hi.Welsh was the best full forward we've had since jameson
What would a fair trade be?
Something in the 30s ?
You're absolutely correct .....Did I hear that right that WB were going to give pick 7 for Wingard?
Chad totally burned port in that case.
6,7, and 10 is an incredible hand
You could probably work a 3 way trade with Brisbane.But are trying to get Beams. They’ll give up 2 firsts and get something back from Brisbane. Hard to say.
Each one of them were capable of dominating a game, and on the odd occasion they all clicked at once.LOL you forgot the smiley face. Modra says hi.
How were we so good in 2005 and 2006. Forward line off Welsh, McGregor, Perrie, Hentschell, Burton, Bode. Luckily our midfield and defence was outstanding that our forwards got so much opportunity to kick a goal.
My god, that is one of the dumbest trade suggestions I've seen.Bicks on fiveaa
Hawthorn send Burton to Crows
Crows give 16 to Hawthorn
They Give that 16 and their first to Port
Port send Wingard to Hawthorn
To be passed on for Stengle ?Reckon pick 40-50 is fair value for Kelly
He's a talented player, but their inability to develop that talent to it's full potential is their own problem, not ours. We're under no obligation to give them the currency they need to start afresh. If we have any interest in him, it should be on our terms.I did something stupid and sat in the corner and read Ports posts.
Then I came across this gem that got them excited:
Port in 8, 13, out Wingard
Crows in Wingard, out 8, 13
That will teach me for surfing their board.
Did I hear that right that WB were going to give pick 7 for Wingard?
Chad totally burned port in that case.
6,7, and 10 is an incredible hand
"Mature Conversation" .....is becoming the new "It is, what it is"Sell the farm
I can't see it happening. They have two fs/academy bids to match in the top 30. I think Beams is much more likely to happen than Kelly, which would take their trade currency needed to take those two kids. Seems to me that Jake Kelly would be a long way down the list of their priorities. I call bullshit.
Then why hasn't it been done yet? ...what is holding the deal up?Nah we can give a pick in the 90s for Stengle
You most definitely misheard that. Chad loves Port Power and he would go to whoever offers them the best pick.
If they have a contract in front of him they probably wouldnt be delisting him.Maybe we're hoping he gets delisted
To me it was telling that hes gone to Hawthorn. He wont be the big name and can play 2nd or 3rd fiddle in a talented forwardline.Chad was a great player a few years ago. Really, really good player. Does he still have the motivation to push himself to be the best player he can be. To win premierships. Or will he be happy to just continue to coast on his talent.
We just got rid of Gov for apparently similar reasons to why Wingard is being shown the door. After what happened with Menzel I can see this potentially ending the same way.
He's a talented player, but their inability to develop that talent to it's full potential is their own problem, not ours. We're under no obligation to give them the currency they need to start afresh. If we have any interest in him, it should be on our terms.
Barrett's find/replace use of 'transactioning' for 'trading' is worse."Mature Conversation" .....is becoming the new "It is, what it is"
To me it was telling that hes gone to Hawthorn. He wont be the big name and can play 2nd or 3rd fiddle in a talented forwardline.
Then why hasn't it been done yet? ...what is holding the deal up?