Mega Thread 2018 Trade Period Discussion part 2! (cont. in Part 3 - link in OP)

What are we going to do??

  • 4 picks 21 and under? Back in Hamish!

    Votes: 74 67.9%
  • Trade up! We’re getting Lukosius / Rankine / Rozee!!!

    Votes: 35 32.1%

  • Total voters
    109
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
My prediction for tomorrow

I reckon we go 8 and 16 to St Kilda for 4 and 28

Then St Kilda send 8 for Steven May

Then 13 and a future first round pick to Brisbane for 5 and a future third round pick for pick

Then that is sent to Fremantle for Neale.

So we end with pick 4, 5 and 21

Hogan stays with Melbourne
Lobb gets to Fremantle for pick 13
Button and 15 for Wingard

Just making a prediction.

I'm taking that and running as quickly as possible
 

Log in to remove this ad.

My prediction for tomorrow

I reckon we go 8 and 16 to St Kilda for 4 and 28

Then St Kilda send 8 for Steven May

Then 13 and a future first round pick to Brisbane for 5 and a future third round pick for pick

Then that is sent to Fremantle for Neale.

So we end with pick 4, 5 and 21

Hogan stays with Melbourne
Lobb gets to Fremantle for pick 13
Button and 15 for Wingard

Just making a prediction.
https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/big-names-caught-up-in-eight-club-mega-deal-20181016-p50a1x.html

If Hombsch helps them get 5 that would suck.

First off we did the unnecessary swap with Gold Coast for 68 and let Francou get there, where is the goodwill back from GC?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Has the moving up the draft order become solely bout trumping port, or people genuninely believe it's what's best for afc?

IMO 2 elite South Australia kids is better than 4 very good Victorian kids who could leave in 3 to 5 years anyway.

Then, and I acknowledge the odds are low but if we can grab Lukosius and Rankine will go a long way towards setting us up for the next 10 years.

Risk reward. It’s worth the gamble
 
Option B because it achieves Option A to ensure Lukosius/Rankine gets to Adelaide.
Some people here just want option A which is stupid. If we keep our current picks we end up with 4 very very good players, if we trade up (which I think we will) that is likely to cut that down to 2.
 
Option B because it achieves Option A to ensure Lukosius/Rankine gets to Adelaide.

What's the obsession with luko? Rankine is great, but I've seen awesome talents over the years not really become great players.
Surely 2 1st rounders is better than 1?
 
How though?
I suspect weve already agreed to part with 8 and 13 but I reckon we want something other than 4.

We have been very coy about it, and we have plenty of time to do it.
 
What's the obsession with luko? Rankine is great, but I've seen awesome talents over the years not really become great players.
Surely 2 1st rounders is better than 1?

Your problem today is that you are treating all first round picks equally, when it's quite clear that is not and never has been the case.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top