Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
And if you want quality over quantity then you just combine those two picks. (and perhaps others) to upgrade them - or maybe using a future pick.I think pick #6 is worth more than pick #22 and pick #26
The second option moves that pick six into more later picks.
We can't field 30 players, we need elite players in our 18 spots on the field.
I'd rather pick 6, 18 could have to be used on henryIt really isn't
But wouldn't it be more likely Freo still having pick 7, using #12 for Henry (assumed matched bid value), and still have #18.6 plus Henry is better than Henry plus 18.
I know Twomey's good but Jackson at 6 is not on their needs. If Serong or Flanders are available they'll probably take themIf this screws us with GWS taking Jackson..
You use the value of picks later in the draft or the following season.
12 gets used. We get pick #55 back for it.So if Henry is bid on at 11 and we have 12 we don’t have to use pick 12 we can use later picks to make up the points?
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
St Kilda are like an 18 year old with a credit card.
But we were never going to get #6 & #12.
But we were never going to get #6 & #12.
We had #7, was possibly going to get #6 (& 2020 futures), but now will have #7 and get #12 & #18.
I'm confused why people think #6 is better than #12 & #18. (12 & 18 is worth more on the points table which is important to Freo for Henry match bidding).