The two points aren't mutually exclusive are they? in fulfilling a degree of obligation to RYDER playing in the Seniors ...Marshall may for limited time play forward, not the majority of time....thus developing a degree of versatility that never goes astray...all the while playing in the ruck for most of his playing time...as his best position....RYDER IF HE WORKS WELL FORWARD WILL BE UTILISED; IF HE TENDS TO THROW THE SIDE OUT OF WHACK THEN THAT WILL REVEAL ITSELF AND THAT OBLIGATION BY THE CLUB WILL DIMINISH..IN TIME..This is the year when these problems will be scrutinised and resolved.I just think they want him to learn to play forward a bit so he can rest there and still be dangerous in the years to come.
I'm not sure what there is to object to since we have Ryder to cover for now and 50+ games to put into Ming.
Its also not like Marshall won't improve just because he's Not playing ruck. Of course he will!!! And he'll be a more rounded player because of it.
I just see the 2 years of Paddys contract. 2 years for Ming to develop, 2 years for Roma to develop in both positions. 2 years for Clark and Coff. Bytel, Parker, Long.. Claverino even. 2ys, 2ys, 2ys, 2ys...
Personally I'm looking forward to seeing it. I can't see why anyone wouldn't be..