List Mgmt. 2020 List Management, Free Agency & Trade thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is Part 1

The thread is continued in part 2:

 

Log in to remove this ad.

How can people still post useless random twitter accounts


Same sh#% every year
in this case they're just a near certainty to be regurgitating what Sam Edmund said the other day, as opposed to doing any work of their own
 
CAMERON DEAL

This one appears the hardest nut to crack of the three, and people close to the deal are still uncertain which way it goes.

Trenches are being dug, as we speak.

In a nutshell, the Giants are slated to receive pick No. 10 as free agency compensation.

It is a selection the Cats strongly believe the Giants should accept for a man who will be 28 early next season.

But GWS want more, and will bank on the Cats pulling off a similar deal to the Dangerfield transaction with Adelaide in 2015.

In that deal, the Cats gave up No. 9, No. 28 and Dean Gore, who never played, for Brownlow Medal winner Patrick Dangerfield.

To solve the impasse, the Giants could accept pick No. 10 from the AFL as free agency compensation and then the Cats could help look after the Giants in another way, if they can.


Had GWS not already committed to Braydon Preuss, perhaps ruckman Rhys Stanley could have been the man to help solve the Giants’ ruck issues in a win-win trade.

It is why Esava Ratugolea, 22, and 202cm Cat Sam De Koning, 19, loom large for the Giants, even though the Cats have no plans at this stage to release them.

But there could be another three-club solution involving Fremantle’s Jesse Hogan.

The Cats could send gun young defender Jordan Clark to the Dockers in exchange for a high-end pick swap.

In turn, the Dockers give Hogan to GWS on the cheap. It means the Giants essentially receive pick No. 10 as free agency compensation and key forward Hogan for Cameron.

While a lot of due diligence must be done to see if Hogan can fit in at GWS, and he may not, it is the kind of solution that might be required to suit both parties.

How will Cameron and three top picks change the Cats?

Out-of-favour Melbourne big man Tom McDonald is another option.

The Cats won’t want Cameron falling into the pre-season draft as Essendon and Sydney Swans, in theory, could both entertain taking him for nothing.

Geelong is adamant it won’t give up multiple first-round picks for Cameron, but the Cats will be pushed to satisfy the Giants in another way.

GWS wants to make a stand after another wave of player departures as it attempts to secure more money in its salary cap to make up for higher house prices in Sydney.

Seventy per cent of the Giants list hails from interstate.
 
CAMERON DEAL

This one appears the hardest nut to crack of the three, and people close to the deal are still uncertain which way it goes.

Trenches are being dug, as we speak.

In a nutshell, the Giants are slated to receive pick No. 10 as free agency compensation.

It is a selection the Cats strongly believe the Giants should accept for a man who will be 28 early next season.

But GWS want more, and will bank on the Cats pulling off a similar deal to the Dangerfield transaction with Adelaide in 2015.

In that deal, the Cats gave up No. 9, No. 28 and Dean Gore, who never played, for Brownlow Medal winner Patrick Dangerfield.

To solve the impasse, the Giants could accept pick No. 10 from the AFL as free agency compensation and then the Cats could help look after the Giants in another way, if they can.


Had GWS not already committed to Braydon Preuss, perhaps ruckman Rhys Stanley could have been the man to help solve the Giants’ ruck issues in a win-win trade.

It is why Esava Ratugolea, 22, and 202cm Cat Sam De Koning, 19, loom large for the Giants, even though the Cats have no plans at this stage to release them.

But there could be another three-club solution involving Fremantle’s Jesse Hogan.

The Cats could send gun young defender Jordan Clark to the Dockers in exchange for a high-end pick swap.

In turn, the Dockers give Hogan to GWS on the cheap. It means the Giants essentially receive pick No. 10 as free agency compensation and key forward Hogan for Cameron.

While a lot of due diligence must be done to see if Hogan can fit in at GWS, and he may not, it is the kind of solution that might be required to suit both parties.

How will Cameron and three top picks change the Cats?

Out-of-favour Melbourne big man Tom McDonald is another option.

The Cats won’t want Cameron falling into the pre-season draft as Essendon and Sydney Swans, in theory, could both entertain taking him for nothing.

Geelong is adamant it won’t give up multiple first-round picks for Cameron, but the Cats will be pushed to satisfy the Giants in another way.

GWS wants to make a stand after another wave of player departures as it attempts to secure more money in its salary cap to make up for higher house prices in Sydney.

Seventy per cent of the Giants list hails from interstate.

So Pick 10 and Hogan for Clarke? :oops:

Goo dlto see that they're just making shit up.
 
Why wouldn't Cats give up 2 firsts for Cameron, Cats are generally pretty reasonable at the trade table, see Danger

Cameron is a 9 time leading goal kicker and a coleman medalist last year.

Cats will get it done for 2 firsts and maybe a lil change coming back their way
 
Giving away Hogan for nothing while coughing up pick #10 for Clark, ew.

Giving away Hogan for the #10 pick we trade to Geelong for Clark after they trade it to GWS for Cameron, not so bad.

Sydney and GWS both really wanting Hogan and Sydney coughing up #4 instead. Better.

Keeping Hogan, wins coleman medal and Norm Smith with 9 goals against Geelong. Best.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Giving away Hogan for nothing while coughing up pick #10 for Clark, ew.

Giving away Hogan for the #10 pick we trade to Geelong for Clark after they trade it to GWS for Cameron, not so bad.

Sydney and GWS both really wanting Hogan and Sydney coughing up #4 instead. Better.

Keeping Hogan, wins coleman medal and Norm Smith with 9 goals against Geelong. Best.

If you go back to the original source of this deal it says we get Clarke and pick 18, and a later pick from GWS (probbaly 46) for Hogan and pick 10. That values Clark at pick 10 and Hogan at pick 25 so about right. Although I would prefer to keep Hogan, Geelong would be more likely to agree to this deal as it enables them to get Cameron for basically pick 18, much less. If they agree outright to trade Clark for 10 then I would do it.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Pick 4 is with Hawthorn? How is that relevant. If you mean Sydney’s pick 3 - literally no one thinks that’s possible. That’s more than we paid for Hogan 2 years ago.
 
In all seriousness mods can we actively delete posts citing these twitter accounts:
@rumours_afl
@AFLTradeWhisper
@TonySheahan

They add nothing to the discussion and their balant attention seeking trolling shouldn't be rewarded.

At least we're spared Ricky Nixon this year as he's canned his account apparently.
 
Geez any journalist talking about Jesse doesn't have much good to say. Maybe he's been murdering blokes off-field?

Can't remember who it was but paraphrasing: The Dees would know exactly what's in Jesse's closet and I'd be staggered if they showed any interest in getting him back.

WTF does he do in his spare time?
 
Geez any journalist talking about Jesse doesn't have much good to say. Maybe he's been murdering blokes off-field?

Can't remember who it was but paraphrasing: The Dees would know exactly what's in Jesse's closet and I'd be staggered if they showed any interest in getting him back.

WTF does he do in his spare time?

Probably blocked Nic Nats texts.
 
Few things I can see happening

switta may be traded Schultz Crowden Henry ahead of him (Walters too if you count as a small forward.

if Harry Taylor Retires I could see Geelong being tempted by Hamling.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top